Last visit was: 31 Oct 2024, 16:45 It is currently 31 Oct 2024, 16:45
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Sub 505 Level|   Probability|                                       
User avatar
redbeanaddict
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Last visit: 09 Aug 2009
Posts: 135
Own Kudos:
398
 [152]
Posts: 135
Kudos: 398
 [152]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
141
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,818
Own Kudos:
11,962
 [31]
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,818
Kudos: 11,962
 [31]
14
Kudos
Add Kudos
17
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
greenoak
Joined: 12 Apr 2008
Last visit: 07 Jun 2011
Posts: 413
Own Kudos:
370
 [22]
Given Kudos: 4
Location: Eastern Europe
Schools:Oxford
 Q49  V42
Posts: 413
Kudos: 370
 [22]
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
12
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
GMATPill
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Last visit: 17 Sep 2020
Posts: 2,261
Own Kudos:
3,716
 [9]
Given Kudos: 8
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,261
Kudos: 3,716
 [9]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Yes - since they are independent events, you can multiply the probabilities together.

Be sure to remember to take the opposite probability for that last one.

Please see: https://www.gmatpill.com/gmat-practice-t ... stion/2387

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubENfsH0tLU[/youtube]
User avatar
ScottTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2024
Posts: 19,675
Own Kudos:
23,711
 [7]
Given Kudos: 287
Status:Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Location: United States (CA)
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 19,675
Kudos: 23,711
 [7]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
redbeanaddict
Xavier, Yvonne, and Zelda each try independently to solve a problem. If their individual probabilities for success are 1/4, 1/2 and 5/8, respectively, what is the probability that Xavier and Yvonne, but not Zelda, will solve the problem?

A. 11/8
B. 7/8
C. 9/64
D. 5/64
E. 3/64

We are first given the individual probabilities that Xavier, Yvonne, and Zelda WILL solve the problem. We list these below:

P(Xavier will solve) = ¼

P(Yvonne will solve) = ½

P(Zelda will solve) = 5/8

However, we see the question asks for the probability that Xavier and Yvonne, but not Zelda, will solve the problem.
Thus we must determine the probability that Zelda WILL NOT solve the problem. "Solving" and "not solving" are complementary events. When two events are complementary, knowing the probability that one event will occur allows us to calculate the probability that the complement will occur. That is, P(A) + P(Not A) = 1. In the case of Zelda, the probability that she WILL NOT solve the problem, is the complement of the probability that she WILL solve the problem.

P(Zelda will solve) + P(Zelda will not solve) = 1

5/8 + P(Zelda will not solve) = 1

P(Zelda will not solve) = 1 – 5/8 = 3/8

Now we can determine the probability that Xavier and Yvonne, but not Zelda, will solve the problem. Since we need to determine three probabilities that all must take place, we must multiply the probabilities together. Thus we have:

P(Xavier will solve) x P(Yvonne will solve) x P(Zelda will not solve)

¼ x ½ x 3/8

1/8 x 3/8 = 3/64

The answer is E
User avatar
Sash143
Joined: 04 Jun 2015
Last visit: 26 Jul 2022
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 62
Kudos: 720
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EMPOWERgmatRichC
Hi All,

In this type of probability question, we're asked for a specific outcome. To solve this problem, we'll have to deal with each piece individually, then multiply the outcomes together.

We're asked for 3 things:

Xavier solves the problem
Yvonne solves the problem
Zelda does NOT solve the problem.

Xavier's probability to solve = 1/4
Yvonne's probability to solve = 1/2
Zelda's probability to NOT solve = 1 - 5/8 = 3/8

The final answer is (1/4)(1/2)(3/8) = 3/64

Final Answer:

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich

Hi Rich,

Could you please tell me why dont we multiply this by 3! ?
(X)(Y)(not Z)
(not Z)(X)(Y)....so on till 6 times.

Please clarify.

Thanks :)
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,818
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,818
Kudos: 11,962
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Sash143,

The question does not state anything about what the "order" of the outcomes must be - just the probability of each of the individual outcomes (and the specific 'overall' outcome that we're looking to calculate). Thus, it's not a permutation question (meaning that it does NOT matter who attempts to solve the problem first, second or third) - and we don't have to do anything besides multiply the individual probabilities together to get the correct answer.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 13 May 2024
Posts: 6,790
Own Kudos:
31,783
 [3]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert reply
Posts: 6,790
Kudos: 31,783
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
redbeanaddict
Xavier, Yvonne, and Zelda each try independently to solve a problem. If their individual probabilities for success are 1/4, 1/2 and 5/8, respectively, what is the probability that Xavier and Yvonne, but not Zelda, will solve the problem?

A. 11/8
B. 7/8
C. 9/64
D. 5/64
E. 3/64

P(Z solves the problem) = 1 - P(Z doesn't solve the problem)
So, 5/8 = 1 - P(Z doesn't solve the problem)
So, P(Z doesn't solve the problem) = 3/8

The question asks us to find P(Xavier and Yvonne solve problem, but Zelda does not solve problem)
So, we want: P(X solves problem AND Y solves problem AND Z does not solve)
= P(X solves problem) x P(Y solves problem) x P(Z does not solve)
= 1/4 x 1/2 x 3/8
= 3/64

Answer:
avatar
Cheryn
Joined: 11 Sep 2017
Last visit: 14 Aug 2019
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
51
 [5]
Given Kudos: 49
Posts: 26
Kudos: 51
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
if x can solve with probability of 25 % and Y can at 50 % then combined together how come it is lesser than both????????? ie here 1/8.. i cannot feel this physically . could somebody explain this??
User avatar
generis
User avatar
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Last visit: 18 Jun 2022
Posts: 5,324
Own Kudos:
36,156
 [6]
Given Kudos: 9,464
Products:
Expert reply
Posts: 5,324
Kudos: 36,156
 [6]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Cheryn
if x can solve with probability of 25 % and Y can at 50 % then combined together how come it is lesser than both????????? ie here 1/8.. i cannot feel this physically . could somebody explain this??
Cheryn, maybe what follows will help, because intuition is important: Think about how strictly or restrictively "success" is defined. (Success = desired outcome = win = passing the test.)

The probability of "success" here is restrictive because BOTH have to pass. If only X OR Y had to pass, success would be easier.

To win, "BOTH this AND that must happen." That is a stricter definition of success than "to win, EITHER this OR that must happen."

In the first case, two people must succeed. In the second case (OR), only one person OR the other person must succeed. It's harder to get two wins than it is to get one win.

Look at the difference: if the question were "What is the probability of X or Y passing the test?" The answer:
\(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{4}=\frac{3}{4}\)
One OR the other must pass? Easier, less restrictive than "both must pass."

Different scenario, but it works exactly the same way.

A coin toss. What is the probability that one coin, flipped twice, will land on tails both times? Success = tails on the first flip AND on the second flip

P (tails) on the first flip is \(\frac{1}{2}\)
P (tails) on second flip = \(\frac{1}{2}\)

Events are independent.
Multiply:\(\frac{1}{2}* \frac{1}{2}=\frac{1}{4}\)

The probability of having both flips come up tails, \(\frac{1}{4}\), is lower (smaller) than the probability of having just one flip come up tails (\(\frac{1}{2}\)).

Again, that is because success is defined more restrictively. It is harder to get two tails on two flips than it is to get one tail on two flips; you have to "beat the odds" twice, not once. Lower probability.

Most probabilities are fractions between 0 and 1. When those fractions are multiplied, they get smaller. That fits.

It can be a little counterintuitive if you focus on AND. "And" might seem as if it should produce a better chance of success than "or." Maybe focus instead on: the definition of success, and how success is achieved.

Almost always, (BOTH must win) will be harder (lower probability) than (ONE OR THE OTHER must win).

Hope that helps.
User avatar
dave13
Joined: 09 Mar 2016
Last visit: 22 Oct 2024
Posts: 1,134
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3,851
Posts: 1,134
Kudos: 1,047
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
redbeanaddict
Xavier, Yvonne, and Zelda each try independently to solve a problem. If their individual probabilities for success are 1/4, 1/2 and 5/8, respectively, what is the probability that Xavier and Yvonne, but not Zelda, will solve the problem?

A. 11/8
B. 7/8
C. 9/64
D. 5/64
E. 3/64

Greetings :-)

can anyone explain whats wrong with the following solution:

multiplied 1/4 * 1/2 * 5/8 = 5/64

than i thought we need to subtract 5/8 from 5/64

isnt it locically correct ? :?

thank you ! :)
User avatar
DavidTutorexamPAL
User avatar
examPAL Representative
Joined: 07 Dec 2017
Last visit: 09 Sep 2020
Posts: 1,048
Own Kudos:
1,843
 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Posts: 1,048
Kudos: 1,843
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dave13
redbeanaddict
Xavier, Yvonne, and Zelda each try independently to solve a problem. If their individual probabilities for success are 1/4, 1/2 and 5/8, respectively, what is the probability that Xavier and Yvonne, but not Zelda, will solve the problem?

A. 11/8
B. 7/8
C. 9/64
D. 5/64
E. 3/64

Greetings :-)

can anyone explain whats wrong with the following solution:

multiplied 1/4 * 1/2 * 5/8 = 5/64

than i thought we need to subtract 5/8 from 5/64

isnt it locically correct ? :?

thank you ! :)

Hi dave13!

Were you going for an approach of calculating 1 - the probability?
In that case you would have needed to calculate (Xavier and Yvonne succeed) - (Xavier and Yvonne and Zelda succeed).
Which is to say 1/4*1/2 - 1/4 * 1/2 * 5/8 = 1/8 - 5/64 = 3/64, answer (E).

What you wrote above was (Xavier and Yvonne and Zelda succeed) - (Zelda succeeds).
This doesn't make sense because it is negative, but even if it were reversed then it would have given you a different result:
(Zelda succeeds) - (Xavier and Yvonne and Zelda succeed) is the probability that (Zelda succeeds and (one or more of Xavier and Yvonne fail))

Pay attention to what is your "1" and what is your "probability" when you calculate "1 - probability"!

Hope that helps.
User avatar
nishantmba
Joined: 29 Oct 2016
Last visit: 03 Jun 2018
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 39
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GPA: 3.84
Products:
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
Posts: 12
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
CrackVerbalGMAT Can you please explain why we do not multiply the product of the individual events with the arrangement? (since the order is not specified here)
avatar
WheatyPie
Joined: 01 Jan 2019
Last visit: 06 Jun 2022
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 51
Kudos: 34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If I'm interested in the probability that, when flipping a coin twice in a row, I get a different result each time... I don't care about the order. These events are independent. This is essentially the same situation as the problem above.

P(Heads) = 1/2
P(Tails) = 1/2

By the arguments given above by numerous people, since we don't care about the order of the result, the answer should be P(H)*P(T) = 1/4

And this is absolutely wrong. The correct answer is P(H)*P(T) + P(T)*P(H) = 1/2 ... precisely BECAUSE we don't care about the order.

The answer to this problem should be (1/4)*(1/2)*(3/8)*3! = 9/32

What am I missing?
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 31 Oct 2024
Posts: 4,888
Own Kudos:
8,020
 [2]
Given Kudos: 223
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Posts: 4,888
Kudos: 8,020
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
CrackVerbalGMAT Can you please explain why we do not multiply the product of the individual events with the arrangement? (since the order is not specified here)
Hello,

What is the event for which we are trying to find the probability here? X and Y should be able to solve the problem while Z should not be able to solve the problem. As such, you need to worry about how considering the order (or NOT considering, for that matter) will affect the number of ways in which the event can be accomplished.

Remember, in a topic like P&C and Probability, you count a certain way of doing an activity/task/event only if it is distinct and hence has a bearing on the total number of ways.

Imagine that you have X, Y, and Z sitting in front of you and you gave them this problem to solve. You also are aware of the probabilities of X, Y and Z will solve the problem (and not solve the problem). Now, if Z got the wrong answer first and X got the right answer last, will it be different from X getting the right answer first and Z getting the wrong answer last? It wouldn’t be, isn’t it?

The only outcome that you have to be worried about is that X and Y should be able to solve the problem while Z should not be able to solve the problem. And that can happen only in 1 way.

Therefore, the required probability = 1/4 * 1/2 * 3/8 = 3/64.

Hope that helps!
Arvind.­
User avatar
graceo
Joined: 05 Jul 2020
Last visit: 26 Dec 2020
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 41
Schools: UCLA MSBA "23
Schools: UCLA MSBA "23
Posts: 15
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If Zelda is not participating, why can't we just eliminate her and have 1/4*1/2?
What can we get if we just do 1/4*1/2?


BrentGMATPrepNow
redbeanaddict
Xavier, Yvonne, and Zelda each try independently to solve a problem. If their individual probabilities for success are 1/4, 1/2 and 5/8, respectively, what is the probability that Xavier and Yvonne, but not Zelda, will solve the problem?

A. 11/8
B. 7/8
C. 9/64
D. 5/64
E. 3/64

P(Z solves the problem) = 1 - P(Z doesn't solve the problem)
So, 5/8 = 1 - P(Z doesn't solve the problem)
So, P(Z doesn't solve the problem) = 3/8

The question asks us to find P(Xavier and Yvonne solve problem, but Zelda does not solve problem)
So, we want: P(X solves problem AND Y solves problem AND Z does not solve)
= P(X solves problem) x P(Y solves problem) x P(Z does not solve)
= 1/4 x 1/2 x 3/8
= 3/64

Answer:
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,818
Own Kudos:
11,962
 [1]
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,818
Kudos: 11,962
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi graceo,

The first sentence tells us that ALL 3 people are trying to solve the problem (independently of one another) - so it's NOT correct to assume that Zelda is not participating. We're asked for a specific Probability calculation and we need 3 specific things to happen: X solves it, Y solves it and Z does NOT solve it. The calculation has to account for all 3 'events' - and your calculation accounts for just the first 2 events.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
User avatar
PGTLrowanhand
Joined: 30 Oct 2012
Last visit: 30 Oct 2024
Posts: 75
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Status:London UK GMAT Consultant / Tutor
Expert reply
Posts: 75
Kudos: 159
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi GMATters,

Here is my video solution to this problem:

User avatar
kevinhirose
Joined: 03 Jul 2023
Last visit: 28 Jun 2024
Posts: 9
Given Kudos: 253
Posts: 9
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel can you answer this? No one that I have gotten an answer from has given me a clear answer. Thanks.
WheatyPie
If I'm interested in the probability that, when flipping a coin twice in a row, I get a different result each time... I don't care about the order. These events are independent. This is essentially the same situation as the problem above.

P(Heads) = 1/2
P(Tails) = 1/2

By the arguments given above by numerous people, since we don't care about the order of the result, the answer should be P(H)*P(T) = 1/4

And this is absolutely wrong. The correct answer is P(H)*P(T) + P(T)*P(H) = 1/2 ... precisely BECAUSE we don't care about the order.

The answer to this problem should be (1/4)*(1/2)*(3/8)*3! = 9/32

What am I missing?
­
User avatar
jaykayes
Joined: 08 Jan 2022
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 43
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 46
Posts: 43
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
kevinhirose
Bunuel can you answer this? No one that I have gotten an answer from has given me a clear answer. Thanks.
WheatyPie
If I'm interested in the probability that, when flipping a coin twice in a row, I get a different result each time... I don't care about the order. These events are independent. This is essentially the same situation as the problem above.

P(Heads) = 1/2
P(Tails) = 1/2

By the arguments given above by numerous people, since we don't care about the order of the result, the answer should be P(H)*P(T) = 1/4

And this is absolutely wrong. The correct answer is P(H)*P(T) + P(T)*P(H) = 1/2 ... precisely BECAUSE we don't care about the order.

The answer to this problem should be (1/4)*(1/2)*(3/8)*3! = 9/32

What am I missing?
­
My approach is slightly different:
  1. The basic definition of probability of anything is: Ratio of (desired outcomes) to (all possible outcomes).­
  2. For discrete events, we can count the number of outcomes in the numerator and denominator manually.
  3. This method is especially useful when we're dealing with relatively small numbers of outcomes.
  4. The core principle to keep in mind while counting outcomes is that the ORDER ALWAYS MATTERS.
  5. Accordingly, for the 2-coin scenario, all possile outcomes are: HH, HT, TH, TT.
    Notice that TH and HT are counted as two different outcomes irrespective of the fact that the outcomes are independent.
    So, denominator = 4.
  6. The desired outcome needs to very precisely interpreted/defined from the question stem.
    Some examples:
    1. Probability of getting both heads: Only one outcome matches this desired outcome, so probability = 1/4
    2. Probability of getting exactly one tail: Two out of the four outcomes match this desired outcome, so probability = 2/4 = 1/2
    3. Probability of getting at least one head: Three out of the four outcomes match this desired outcome, so probability = 3/4
Hope this helps.­
Moderator:
Math Expert
96533 posts