GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 21 Nov 2019, 17:11

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 126
An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 May 2011, 16:42
8
146
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

68% (01:46) correct 32% (01:55) wrong based on 2591 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet after t seconds, where h = -16 (t -3)^2 + 150. At what height, in feet, is the object 2 seconds after it reaches its maximum height?

A. 6
B. 86
C. 134
D. 150
E. 214
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59236
Re: An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Oct 2012, 04:21
34
37
IEsailor wrote:
An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet after t seconds, where h = -16 (t -3)^2 + 150. At what height, in feet, is the object 2 seconds after it reaches its maximum height?

A. 6
B. 86
C. 134
D. 150
E. 214

Given that $$h=150-16(t-3)^2$$.

In order to maximize $$h$$, we need to minimize $$16(t-3)^2$$ (since it's subtracted from 150), which means minimizing $$(t-3)^2$$. Now, since $$(t-3)^2$$ is always non-negative, then the smallest possible value of $$(t-3)^2$$ is 0, for $$t=3$$.

Two seconds later or for $$t=3+2=5$$, the height will be $$h=150-16(5-3)^2=86$$.

Hope it's clear.
_________________
Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2011
Posts: 533
Re: PS - Height of object  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 May 2011, 17:25
7
2
Maximum height is reached at t=3 i.e 150

2 sec's after reaching maximum height object will be in free fall mode.
=> height at t =1, is the height of the object 2 seconds after it reaches its maximum height?

substituting t=2 we have 150-16(4)
=86

##### General Discussion
Director
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 832
Re: PS - Height of object  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 May 2011, 21:23
5
2
max height at t=3, 150

2 sec after t=3 means t=5.

substituting h= -64 + 150 = 86
Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Location: Russian Federation
WE: Supply Chain Management (Energy and Utilities)
Re: PS - Height of object  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 May 2011, 00:17
Spidy001 wrote:
Maximum height is reached at t=3 i.e 150

2 sec's after reaching maximum height object will be in free fall mode.
=> height at t =1, is the height of the object 2 seconds after it reaches its maximum height?

substituting t=2 we have 150-16(4)
=86

How you can say the max height is reached when t=3
Intern
Joined: 12 Jan 2012
Posts: 21
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
Re: PS - Height of object  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Oct 2012, 03:22
divyakatas wrote:
Spidy001 wrote:
Maximum height is reached at t=3 i.e 150

2 sec's after reaching maximum height object will be in free fall mode.
=> height at t =1, is the height of the object 2 seconds after it reaches its maximum height?

substituting t=2 we have 150-16(4)
=86

How you can say the max height is reached when t=3

Method 1: -16(t-3)^2 would reduce the value of 150 and h would be maximum when -16(t-3) ^2 = 0 ie t = 3
Method 2: using derivatives dh/dt = 0.
Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 99
Re: An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2013, 01:30
3
1
IEsailor wrote:
An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet after t seconds, where h = -16 (t -3)^2 + 150. At what height, in feet, is the object 2 seconds after it reaches its maximum height?

A. 6
B. 86
C. 134
D. 150
E. 214

Hi,

h = -16 (t -3)^2 + 150
h = 150 - 16 (t -3)^2

Now, in the above expression whenever t is of any value except 3, the overall $$(t-3)^2$$ is always +ve.
and this +ve value is multiplies by -16.. Hence, this overall value is negative.

In order to make sure that max. height is reached, $$-16(t-3)^2$$ has to be positive, but it is never positive. SO a zero value will work to get the max. height.

So t has to be 3 to get $$-16 (t -3)^2$$ as zero, and obtain the maximum height.

Now, when t=3
h=150

The question asks for the height when time is 2 second after max height. After max. height, the object will fall.
So, the time will be 5 second. ( 3+2)

$$h = 150 -16(5-3)^2$$
h = 150 - 16*4
h = 150 -64
h = 86

Hence, the height will be 86 feet.

Thanks,
Jai

KUDOS if it helped..!!!
_________________
MODULUS Concept ---> http://gmatclub.com/forum/inequalities-158054.html#p1257636
HEXAGON Theory ---> http://gmatclub.com/forum/hexagon-theory-tips-to-solve-any-heaxgon-question-158189.html#p1258308
Manager
Status: Eagles Become Vultures
Joined: 19 Jun 2014
Posts: 54
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Schools: LBS '18 (M)
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39
GPA: 4
WE: Corporate Finance (Energy and Utilities)
An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jan 2015, 13:01
1
First find out what height would be considered as 'maximum' given the equation:

Since 150 is a constant, find out what the product's maximum value can be. It is a product of a negative number and a squared parenthesis; this product would ALWAYS be negative UNLESS the parenthesis yields zero - this would be the point at which the product would have maximum value.

For t = 3, the expression would yield 0 + 150. Hence, the maximum possible height given by this equation would be 150 feet. Therefore, after reaching this height, the object would start falling. The 'start' time of falling would be after 3 seconds, so adding 2 seconds would be 5:

h = -16 x (5-3)^2 + 150
h = -16 x 4 + 150
h = 86
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Status: GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Posts: 15503
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jan 2016, 17:10
2
1
Hi All,

This is an example of a "limit" question. The question requires you to figure out the "maximum" height using a given equation.

You'll notice that the first part of the equation is -16(other things), so you'll subtract something from 150 except when that first part = 0

If t = 3 seconds, then you have -16(0)^2 + 150 = 150 feet

So, 150 feet is the maximum height.

We're asked for the height 2 seconds AFTER the maximum height, so plug in t = 5

-16(5-3)^2 + 150 = -64 + 150 = 86; Answer B

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
_________________
Contact Rich at: Rich.C@empowergmat.com

The Course Used By GMAT Club Moderators To Earn 750+

souvik101990 Score: 760 Q50 V42 ★★★★★
ENGRTOMBA2018 Score: 750 Q49 V44 ★★★★★
Director
Status: Professional GMAT Tutor
Affiliations: AB, cum laude, Harvard University (Class of '02)
Joined: 10 Jul 2015
Posts: 713
Location: United States (CA)
Age: 40
GMAT 1: 770 Q47 V48
GMAT 2: 730 Q44 V47
GMAT 3: 750 Q50 V42
GRE 1: Q168 V169
WE: Education (Education)
Re: An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 May 2016, 22:22
2
1
Attached is a visual that should help.
Attachments

Screen Shot 2016-05-25 at 9.42.24 PM.png [ 122.1 KiB | Viewed 36272 times ]

_________________
Harvard grad and 99% GMAT scorer, offering expert, private GMAT tutoring and coaching worldwide since 2002.

One of the only known humans to have taken the GMAT 5 times and scored in the 700s every time (700, 710, 730, 750, 770), including verified section scores of Q50 / V47, as well as personal bests of 8/8 IR (2 times), 6/6 AWA (4 times), 50/51Q and 48/51V.

You can download my official test-taker score report (all scores within the last 5 years) directly from the Pearson Vue website: https://tinyurl.com/y7knw7bt Date of Birth: 09 December 1979.

GMAT Action Plan and Free E-Book - McElroy Tutoring

Contact: mcelroy@post.harvard.edu (I do not respond to PMs on GMAT Club) or find me on reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/GMATpreparation
Intern
Joined: 28 Dec 2015
Posts: 37
Re: An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 May 2016, 01:36
h=-16(t-3)^2+150

This further simplifies to
h=-16t^2+96t+6

Now this is an downward parabola,since a is negative.

The vertex or the maximum height is given by

t=-b/2a or t=-96/2*-16 or t=3 seconds
So at t=3 sec the max height is reached.

2 seconds later what is the height?

So,t=5 sec
Substitute in the height equation to get h=86 ft.
Target Test Prep Representative
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Joined: 04 Mar 2011
Posts: 2812
Re: An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jun 2016, 12:16
2
IEsailor wrote:
An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet after t seconds, where h = -16 (t -3)^2 + 150. At what height, in feet, is the object 2 seconds after it reaches its maximum height?

A. 6
B. 86
C. 134
D. 150
E. 214

We are given an equation h = –16(t – 3)^2 + 150, with the following information:

h = height of h feet

t = number of seconds

We need to determine the height, in feet, 2 seconds after it reaches maximum height. So we first need to determine the value of t when the object's height h is the maximum. In other words, we need to determine the maximum value for this equation.

We first focus on “-16(t - 3)^2”. We ascertain that (t – 3)^2 is always either positive or 0. However, when (t – 3)^2 is multiplied by –16, a negative number, the product will be negative. Thus, the best we can do is to have the expression -16(t - 3)^2 equal 0, which would yield the maximum value of –16(t – 3)^2 + 150. We can obtain this value by letting t = 3.

We now know that the object reaches its maximum height at t = 3 (and the maximum height is 150 ft). However, we want the height of the object 2 seconds after it reaches the maximum height. Thus, we want the height at t = 5 since 3 + 2 = 5. Thus, we can plug in 5 for t and solve for h.

h = -16(t - 3)^2 + 150

h = -16(5 - 3)^2 + 150

h = -16(2)^2 + 150

h = -16 x 4 + 150

h = -64 + 150

h = 86

_________________

# Jeffrey Miller

Jeff@TargetTestPrep.com
122 Reviews

5-star rated online GMAT quant
self study course

See why Target Test Prep is the top rated GMAT quant course on GMAT Club. Read Our Reviews

If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Kudos" button.

Intern
Joined: 07 Jul 2016
Posts: 37
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Marketing
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V41
GPA: 3.6
Re: An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2016, 20:25
ok here is what i did in the first attempt.....
max height reached is 150 . 2 seconds after that h = -16(2-3)^2 + 150 = -16+150 = 134. 150-134 = 16. Where did i go wrong?
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Status: GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Posts: 15503
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2016, 20:56

The equation that the prompt gives us to work with tells us the height of the ball after T seconds have elapsed.

So, after 3 seconds (meaning T=3), the height of the ball is 150 feet.

Two seconds AFTER that would be the 5 second 'mark' (meaning T=5). In your calculation, you plugged in T=2.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
_________________
Contact Rich at: Rich.C@empowergmat.com

The Course Used By GMAT Club Moderators To Earn 750+

souvik101990 Score: 760 Q50 V42 ★★★★★
ENGRTOMBA2018 Score: 750 Q49 V44 ★★★★★
Intern
Joined: 07 Jul 2016
Posts: 37
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Marketing
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V41
GPA: 3.6
Re: An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2016, 22:29
1
2 seconds after reaching the maximum height, time to reach the maximum height is 3 seconds, so after 2 seconds the fall is calculated is 134. I think i understand the flaw in my calculation the formula is from the starting point only hence it cannot be applied after reaching the maximum height.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Posts: 4076
Re: An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Aug 2017, 13:37
1
Top Contributor
1
IEsailor wrote:
An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet after t seconds, where h = -16 (t -3)^2 + 150. At what height, in feet, is the object 2 seconds after it reaches its maximum height?

A. 6
B. 86
C. 134
D. 150
E. 214

The formula h = -16 (t - 3)² + 150 allows us to determine the height of the object at any time. For what value of t is -16(t-3)² + 150 MAXIMIZED(in other words, the object is at its maximum height)?

It might be easier to answer this question if we rewrite the formula as h = 150 - 16(t-3)²
To MAXIMIZE the value of h, we need to MINIMIZE the value of 16(t-3)² and this means minimizing the value of (t-3)²
As you can see,(t-3)² is minimized when t = 3.

We want to know the height 2 seconds AFTER the object's height is maximized, so we want to know that height at 5 seconds (3+2)

At t = 5, the height = 150 - 16(5 - 3)²
= 150 - 16(2)²
= 150 - 64
= 86

RELATED VIDEO FROM OUR COURSE

_________________
Test confidently with gmatprepnow.com
Manager
Joined: 30 Apr 2013
Posts: 75
Re: An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Oct 2017, 04:35
1
Is this concept frequently tested in GMAT? I am finding it little difficult to understand.
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Status: GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Posts: 15503
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Oct 2017, 11:45
2
Hi santro789,

This is an example of a 'limit' question - and this particular 'design' is relatively rare (you might not see it at all on Test Day). In the broader sense though, the concept isn't that difficult. You're told that there's a MAXIMUM height, so you have to think about what has to happen to achieve the highest possible height given that equation (and when you think of everything in those terms, you're really just dealing with a Number Property and using critical thinking skills - NOT 'math' skills). Even if you don't spot the pattern here, you can still 'brute force' the solution: just plug in increasing values of T until you get the answer.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
_________________
Contact Rich at: Rich.C@empowergmat.com

The Course Used By GMAT Club Moderators To Earn 750+

souvik101990 Score: 760 Q50 V42 ★★★★★
ENGRTOMBA2018 Score: 750 Q49 V44 ★★★★★
Manager
Status: Quant Expert Q51
Joined: 02 Aug 2014
Posts: 103
An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2018, 06:59
I prepared a youtube video to explain this question. Hope you'll like it.

Check the explanation on this video
_________________
SVP
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Posts: 1854
Location: India
Re: An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2019, 18:52
IEsailor wrote:
An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet after t seconds, where h = -16 (t -3)^2 + 150. At what height, in feet, is the object 2 seconds after it reaches its maximum height?

A. 6
B. 86
C. 134
D. 150
E. 214

Object reaches maximum height at t=3

Height at t=3+2=5 ; -16(5-3)^2+150=-64+150=86

IMO B

Posted from my mobile device
_________________
"Success is not final; failure is not fatal: It is the courage to continue that counts."

Please provide kudos if you like my post. Kudos encourage active discussions.

My GMAT Resources: -

Efficient Learning
All you need to know about GMAT quant

Tele: +91-11-40396815
Mobile : +91-9910661622
E-mail : kinshook.chaturvedi@gmail.com
Re: An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet   [#permalink] 15 Sep 2019, 18:52

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 21 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by