Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 23:32 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 23:32

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92883
Own Kudos [?]: 618653 [3]
Given Kudos: 81563
Send PM
SVP
SVP
Joined: 24 Nov 2016
Posts: 1720
Own Kudos [?]: 1344 [2]
Given Kudos: 607
Location: United States
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Mar 2019
Posts: 364
Own Kudos [?]: 281 [0]
Given Kudos: 35
Location: India
Concentration: Healthcare, General Management
Schools:
GPA: 3.75
WE:Pharmaceuticals (Health Care)
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Dec 2017
Posts: 301
Own Kudos [?]: 269 [1]
Given Kudos: 22
Location: India
GMAT 1: 580 Q42 V27
Send PM
Re: Attorneys for a criminal defendant charged that the government, in a [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Ans: A

(A) It leaves open the question of whether the government had destroyed such evidence.

the government does not satisfactorily address the allegations, it leaves the question open.
CEO
CEO
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Posts: 2552
Own Kudos [?]: 1813 [0]
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: Attorneys for a criminal defendant charged that the government, in a [#permalink]
Attorneys for a criminal defendant charged that the government, in a cover-up, had destroyed evidence that government replied that there is no evidence that would even tend to support the defendant in the case.

Which one of the following is the most accurate evaluation of the government’s reply?

(A) It leaves open the question of whether the government had destroyed such evidence. - CORRECT. If govt knew that evidence would not have benefitted the defendant then there must be something worthy enough to get evaluated and concluded in such a manner as govt did. It was not a fair or neutral stance on govt's part.

(B) It establishes that the attorneys’ charge is an exaggeration. - WRONG. No not all.

(C) It shows that the attorneys did not know whether their charge was true. - WRONG. Altogether leads the passage in a different direction that is not relevant or rather kills the question stem itself.

(D) It demonstrates the government’s failure to search for evidence in its files. - WRONG. Opposite(evidence-wise) to what we are looking for.

(E) If true, it effectively disproves the charge made on behalf of the defendant. - WRONG. Now this what we call an exaggeration.

So many THATs that I'm searching for space to hide myself from them such that that it is making me paranoic. :lol: :dazed

Anyway coming back to the point. The crux of the passage is that the claim on defendant's behalf made by Attorney's is eventually true because of the inherent nature of govt's reply. Basically, govt's reply is such that it shot it's own feet. So, which one of the choice does that is our answer.

Answer A.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Sep 2023
Posts: 30
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 23
Location: Korea, Republic of
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V41
GPA: 3.6
Send PM
Re: Attorneys for a criminal defendant charged that the government, in a [#permalink]
Quote:
Attorneys for a criminal defendant charged that the government, in a cover-up, had destroyed evidence that government replied that there is no evidence that would even tend to support the defendant in the case.

Which one of the following is the most accurate evaluation of the government’s reply?




Type: Argument (by Government and by Attorney)

Conclusion by Attorney: the government destroyed the evidence favorable to the defendant
Conclusion by Government: there is no evidence that would even tend to support the defendant in the case
Premise: None for both
Answer: (A) It leaves open the question of whether the government had destroyed such evidence.
Why: No premise exists for either argument.

GMAT Club Bot
Re: Attorneys for a criminal defendant charged that the government, in a [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne