Last visit was: 18 May 2024, 09:05 It is currently 18 May 2024, 09:05
Toolkit
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

SORT BY:
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Intern
Joined: 17 Sep 2011
Posts: 43
Own Kudos [?]: 492 [1]
Given Kudos: 36
GMAT 1: 660 Q43 V38
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 93334
Own Kudos [?]: 624711 [5]
Given Kudos: 81899
General Discussion
Manager
Joined: 06 Feb 2012
Posts: 84
Own Kudos [?]: 125 [3]
Given Kudos: 16
WE:Project Management (Other)
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14891
Own Kudos [?]: 65346 [4]
Given Kudos: 431
Location: Pune, India
4
Kudos
jfk wrote:
Dear all,

I'm having some trouble with factoring quadratic equations, especially if the numbers get higher / more complex.

More specifically, I'm struggling with this quadratic equation:

t^2+4t-672=0

this comes down to

(t-24)(t+28)=0

But I don't know how to arrive at this solution in the most efficient way.

Would really appreciate if someone could help me out here.

Thanks a lot!

First, check out this post: hard-factoring-question-109006.html#p870223
It discusses how to factor harder quadratic equations.

Coming to this question, you have -672 so the two factors which multiply to give 672 will have opposite signs i.e. one of them will be positive and the other will be negative. Also, their difference will be 4 i.e. very small.
Try and split 672 into its factors. We see that 672 is divisible by 4.
672 = 4*168 = 4*4*42 = 4*4*2*3*7 (We try to split the number till we get manageable factors)

Now you have to try various combinations of these factors till you get a pair with a difference of 4. Notice that the difference is very small so we need to get 2 factors which are kind of equal to each other. Say, one factor can be 7*4 and another can be 6*4. 28 and 24 actually do have a difference of 4 so we have got our 2 factors.

t^2 + 28t - 24t - 672 = 0
(t-24)(t+28) = 0
Intern
Joined: 17 Sep 2011
Posts: 43
Own Kudos [?]: 492 [0]
Given Kudos: 36
GMAT 1: 660 Q43 V38
Intern
Joined: 26 Jun 2011
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Do you need to solve this problem with paper and pen or can you use a calculator, program, or website?

If you need an analytical solution, or pen-and-paper, another way to attack this type of problem would be to use the Quadratic Formula (QF); there is a lot of good material about the QF on Wikipedia or MathWorld. This approach is easier if you have a calculator, but it allows for exact, algebraic, solutions.

On the other hand, if you cannot solve the problem easily, you might not have a choice but to use the QF.
And if you are allowed to use a program or web applet, then you can solve the problem numerically.

For example, here is a free online applet that solves a Quadratic Equation:

Whether you use a web program, a full-blown computer program, or a pocket calculator, once you have numeric solutions root1 and root2, you could then re-state the original equation in the following form:

(t - root1)(t - root2)

If the roots are nice round numbers, that is nice but doesn't always happen. The solutions are what they are.
Intern
Joined: 03 Feb 2012
Posts: 44
Own Kudos [?]: 56 [0]
Given Kudos: 12
Location: United States (WI)
Concentration: Other
Schools: University of Wisconsin (Madison) - Class of 2014
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V38
GMAT 2: 760 Q48 V46
GPA: 3.66
WE:Marketing (Manufacturing)
Quote:
Do you need to solve this problem with paper and pen or can you use a calculator, program, or website?

I'm pretty sure GMAC would frown upon any of the later....
Intern
Joined: 26 Jun 2011
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
nsspaz151 wrote:
I'm pretty sure GMAC would frown upon any of the later....

True. I forgot the overall context of these forums. I looked at the question by itself and just gave a general answer.

In any case, if a solution cannot be found quickly by inspection, I suppose the QF is the only way to go. Unless a person wants to make a bunch of guesses and hope they get lucky.
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 33061
Own Kudos [?]: 828 [0]
Given Kudos: 0