Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 17:32 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 17:32
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
NoHalfMeasures
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 29 Oct 2013
Last visit: 11 Jul 2023
Posts: 219
Own Kudos:
2,573
 [22]
Given Kudos: 204
Concentration: Finance
GPA: 3.7
WE:Corporate Finance (Retail Banking)
Posts: 219
Kudos: 2,573
 [22]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
18
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,474
Own Kudos:
30,880
 [9]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,474
Kudos: 30,880
 [9]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
vad3tha
Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Last visit: 15 Dec 2023
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 148
Posts: 106
Kudos: 584
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
wmichaelxie
Joined: 17 Jan 2016
Last visit: 01 Jan 2020
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 12
Products:
Posts: 12
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Are we supposed to ignore negative numbers when dealing with sequence problems? For example, I wrote out the numbers of statement 2 and found it to be insufficient ~ 3, -1, 2, 1, 3, 4, 7, 11, 18 (going backwards to negative infiniti) Am i overthinking it?
avatar
wmichaelxie
Joined: 17 Jan 2016
Last visit: 01 Jan 2020
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 12
Products:
Posts: 12
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think this is a poor quality question and the explanation is not clear enough.
User avatar
abhimahna
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Last visit: 06 Jul 2024
Posts: 3,481
Own Kudos:
5,779
 [1]
Given Kudos: 346
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,481
Kudos: 5,779
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
wmichaelxie
Are we supposed to ignore negative numbers when dealing with sequence problems? For example, I wrote out the numbers of statement 2 and found it to be insufficient ~ 3, -1, 2, 1, 3, 4, 7, 11, 18 (going backwards to negative infiniti) Am i overthinking it?

wmichaelxie
I think this is a poor quality question and the explanation is not clear enough.

I must say you are overthinking this. This is an easy question and much clear on everything.

We are given that 4th term is 11 and 5th term is 18. So, in the sequence you have mentioned above, I couldn't see your statement 2 is matching. So, its an incorrect sequence.

If I take a sequence as a, b, a + b, a + 2b, 2a + 3b ,.. so on.

I will get a + 2b = 11 and 2a + 3b = 18.

On solving these equations, we will get a = 3.

Hence, B is sufficient.
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,474
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,474
Kudos: 30,880
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
abhimahna
wmichaelxie
Are we supposed to ignore negative numbers when dealing with sequence problems? For example, I wrote out the numbers of statement 2 and found it to be insufficient ~ 3, -1, 2, 1, 3, 4, 7, 11, 18 (going backwards to negative infiniti) Am i overthinking it?

wmichaelxie
I think this is a poor quality question and the explanation is not clear enough.

I must say you are overthinking this. This is an easy question and much clear on everything.

We are given that 4th term is 11 and 5th term is 18. So, in the sequence you have mentioned above, I couldn't see your statement 2 is matching. So, its an incorrect sequence.

If I take a sequence as a, b, a + b, a + 2b, a + 3b ,.. so on.

I will get a + 2b = 11 and a + 3b = 18.

On solving these equations, we will get a = 3.

Hence, B is sufficient.
Dear abhimahna,

My friend, you found the correct answer, but the algebraic representations you used (a, b, a + b, a + 2b, a + 3b, ...) are not correct for a recursive series. The fifth term would be 2a + 3b. Perhaps you knew this already, because you found the correct answer.

Mike :-)
User avatar
abhimahna
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Last visit: 06 Jul 2024
Posts: 3,481
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 346
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,481
Kudos: 5,779
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
abhimahna
wmichaelxie
Are we supposed to ignore negative numbers when dealing with sequence problems? For example, I wrote out the numbers of statement 2 and found it to be insufficient ~ 3, -1, 2, 1, 3, 4, 7, 11, 18 (going backwards to negative infiniti) Am i overthinking it?

wmichaelxie
I think this is a poor quality question and the explanation is not clear enough.

I must say you are overthinking this. This is an easy question and much clear on everything.

We are given that 4th term is 11 and 5th term is 18. So, in the sequence you have mentioned above, I couldn't see your statement 2 is matching. So, its an incorrect sequence.

If I take a sequence as a, b, a + b, a + 2b, a + 3b ,.. so on.

I will get a + 2b = 11 and a + 3b = 18.

On solving these equations, we will get a = 3.

Hence, B is sufficient.
Dear abhimahna,

My friend, you found the correct answer, but the algebraic representations you used (a, b, a + b, a + 2b, a + 3b, ...) are not correct for a recursive series. The fifth term would be 2a + 3b. Perhaps you knew this already, because you found the correct answer.

Mike :-)

Hey Mike ( @mikemcgarry), thanks for pointing that out. It was actually a typo error. I used the 5th term as 2a + 3b only to get to the answer.

Original answer corrected.

Thanks :)
avatar
wmichaelxie
Joined: 17 Jan 2016
Last visit: 01 Jan 2020
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 12
Products:
Posts: 12
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Great, thank you. I missed that.
User avatar
KrishnakumarKA1
Joined: 05 Jan 2017
Last visit: 13 Oct 2020
Posts: 398
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
Location: India
Posts: 398
Kudos: 314
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Prompt analysis
An = An-1 +An-2

Superset
The answer will be a real number

Translation
In order to find the answer, we need:
1# exact value of 1st term
2# any other information to find the 1st term thruogh the equation

Statement analysis
St 1: we know the one term. But we don't know the break of that term as in what two numbers have formed 29. INSUFFICIENT
St 2: 5th term =4th term +3rd term. Therfore 3rd term = 7. Similarly 4th term = 3rd term +2nd term. Therfore 2nd term = 4 and similarly 1st term is 3. ANSWER

Option B
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,964
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,964
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109785 posts
498 posts
212 posts