Last visit was: 31 Aug 2024, 19:28 It is currently 31 Aug 2024, 19:28
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 95291
Own Kudos [?]: 654405 [6]
Given Kudos: 87117
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 95291
Own Kudos [?]: 654405 [4]
Given Kudos: 87117
Send PM
General Discussion
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2014
Posts: 315
Own Kudos [?]: 355 [0]
Given Kudos: 346
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: ISB '24
Send PM
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 15259
Own Kudos [?]: 67722 [1]
Given Kudos: 438
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Jason: The solar cooker provides free energy for cooking, baking, and [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Bunuel wrote:
Jason: The solar cooker provides free energy for cooking, baking, and cleaning water. People who use it avoid indoor smoke inhalation, fire hazards, and injuries from gathering firewood. They also have environmental benefits such as reducing deforestation, lowering energy costs, and reducing CO2 emissions. The solar cooker is a simple solution to a host of problems in the developing world.

Zola: While I agree with your arguments, I disagree with your conclusion. Solar cookers have all of those benefits. Unfortunately, it takes a long time for them to bring water to a boil—usually between two and three hours—and they require ample sunlight, which is not always available in the rainy season. In practice, they are not a perfect solution by far.

Zola responds to Jason’s argument using which one of the following argumentative techniques?


(A) She argues that Jason’s conclusion is just a restatement of his fallacious arguments.

(B) She argues that Jason’s conception of the ills of developing nations is too limited in scope and thus his conclusion is insufficient.

(C) She questions the integrity of Jason’s research and whether his conclusion is based on a faulty foundation.

(D) She gives an alternate interpretation of the assumptions that results in a different conclusion altogether.

(E) She introduces caveats that weaken several of Jason’s assumptions.

­

Jason’s argument: The solar cooker provides free energy, leads to avoidance of indoor smoke inhalation, fire hazards, and injuries from gathering firewood, and reduces deforestation and CO2 emissions. So, solar cooker is a simple solution to a host of problems in the developing world.

Zola: Your premises are correct but not your conclusion. Solar cookers have all of those benefits. But they have some drawbacks (long time for boiling water, require ample sunlight which is not always available). In practice, they are not a perfect solution by far.

Jason and Zola have opposing views.
Jason claims that solar cooker is a simple solution to a host of problems in the developing world.
Zola feels that solar cookers are not the great solution they are made out to be.

So, Zola agrees with Jason’s premises but brings in additional considerations that weaken his conclusion.
So, the ‘method of disagreement’ here is "One can provide additional data that weakens the conclusion."

(A) She argues that Jason’s conclusion is just a restatement of his fallacious arguments.

She does not say that Jason’s argument is fallacious and neither does she state that the conclusion is a restatement.

(B) She argues that Jason’s conception of the ills of developing nations is too limited in scope and thus his conclusion is insufficient.



She does not say that Jason does not cover the issues of developing nations. She brings forth the shortcomings of solar energy.

(C) She questions the integrity of Jason’s research and whether his conclusion is based on a faulty foundation.



Zola does not question Jason’s research.

(D) She gives an alternate interpretation of the assumptions that results in a different conclusion altogether.

She does not give any alternate interpretation.

(E) She introduces caveats that weaken several of Jason’s assumptions.

Correct. Jason concludes that solar cooker is a simple solution so he assumes that there are no big issues with it. He assumes that it works well and is not problematic. But she introduces considerations that weaken this.

Answer (E)

Method Questions are discussed here:
https://youtu.be/uA5aXAZI1Z8
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Jason: The solar cooker provides free energy for cooking, baking, and [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7048 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
CR Forum Moderator
824 posts