Events & Promotions
| Last visit was: 06 Sep 2026, 02:57 |
It is currently 06 Sep 2026, 02:57 |
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 0609:30 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EST
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sundays Sept. 6, 2026.
Sep 0712:01 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
On the 7th, GMAT Club Tests will be Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PDT
Sep 0712:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Tejas studied hard but kept repeating the same mistakes. After 3 attempts at 645, a focused 4-week strategy helped him identify and fix what was holding him back—leading to a 695 with just 12–15 hours of study per week.
Sep 0201:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Take 30% off all study plans with code COURSEWORK - Expires on Monday 9/7
Sep 0401:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
This Labor Day, turn your hard work into real score gains. From 615→715 in 15 days to 705 in 30 days, our students prove what's possible with personalized, expert guidance. Save up to 25% on 1-on-1 tutoring.
Sep 0410:00 AM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.- Sep 07
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
A complete walkthrough of GMAT Club’s free 12-week GMAT study plan: what you study each week, how progress and goals are tracked, how the error log works, and how your practice unlocks paid tools at no cost. - Sep 09
07:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway - Sep 09
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Three MBA applications. Three rejections. No interview invites. A year later, Aman was admitted to Cambridge Judge, SMU, and IMD. In this episode of MBA Admit Stories, Aman shares how he rebuilt his MBA application... 
Sep 1008:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2108:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
11 Dec 2020, 01:20
Kudos
Bookmarks
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
55%
(hard)
Question Stats:
55% (01:26) correct
45%
(01:36)
wrong
based on 606
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Marife: That was a bad movie because, by not providing viewers with all the information necessary for solving the murder, it violated a requirement of murder mysteries.
Nguyen: But the filmmaker wanted viewers to focus on the complex relationship between the chief detective and her assistant. The murder just provided the context in which the relationship developed, and should not be taken as a defining characteristic of the film.
Marife's and Nguyen's comments indicate that they disagree about
(A) whether the movie was a bad one
(B) whether the relationship between the chief detective and her assistant was an important part of the movie
(C) whether the movie should be classified as a murder mystery
(D) the appropriateness of trying to find criteria that all mystery movies must meet
(E) whether the filmmaker wanted viewers to be able to solve the murder
Nguyen: But the filmmaker wanted viewers to focus on the complex relationship between the chief detective and her assistant. The murder just provided the context in which the relationship developed, and should not be taken as a defining characteristic of the film.
Marife's and Nguyen's comments indicate that they disagree about
(A) whether the movie was a bad one
(B) whether the relationship between the chief detective and her assistant was an important part of the movie
(C) whether the movie should be classified as a murder mystery
(D) the appropriateness of trying to find criteria that all mystery movies must meet
(E) whether the filmmaker wanted viewers to be able to solve the murder
11 Dec 2020, 01:59
Kudos
Bookmarks
The answer should be E-
A) Nguyen, never commented that the movie good or bad
B) Marife, never state whether the relationship is an important part or not
C) Nguyen never said whether the movie is classified as a murder mystery or not
D) Not relevant
E) Correct- as Marife, states that "by not providing viewers with all the information necessary for solving the murder, it violated a requirement of murder mysteries", Marife agrees that filmmakers want the audience to solve the murder, but as the movie didn't provide necessary information thus it is a bad movie.
and Nguyen states that "filmmaker wanted viewers to focus on the complex relationship between the chief detective and her assistant."
Thus both of them disagree on "whether the filmmaker wanted viewers to be able to solve the murder".
Therefore the answer is E
A) Nguyen, never commented that the movie good or bad
B) Marife, never state whether the relationship is an important part or not
C) Nguyen never said whether the movie is classified as a murder mystery or not
D) Not relevant
E) Correct- as Marife, states that "by not providing viewers with all the information necessary for solving the murder, it violated a requirement of murder mysteries", Marife agrees that filmmakers want the audience to solve the murder, but as the movie didn't provide necessary information thus it is a bad movie.
and Nguyen states that "filmmaker wanted viewers to focus on the complex relationship between the chief detective and her assistant."
Thus both of them disagree on "whether the filmmaker wanted viewers to be able to solve the murder".
Therefore the answer is E
11 Dec 2020, 08:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
Clearly between C and E.
(C) whether the movie should be classified as a murder mystery
Yes, I think this is the correct one. First person clearly states that it is a requirement of murder mysteries that viewers be given clues to solve the mysteries. This first person thinks that the movie is indeed a murder mystery.
Second person, on the other hand, states that the filmmaker wanted to keep the murder thing as a side thing and his primary focus was something else. Clearly, in the second person's opinion, the movie is not a murder mystery as murder is a side element in the story.
(E) whether the filmmaker wanted viewers to be able to solve the murder
Wrong in my opinion.
First person simply states what are pre-requisites of a murder mystery. She never talks or implies that filmmaker "wanted" the viewers to be able to solve the mystery. So she cannot disagree with the second person on this topic.
Second person, on other hand, clearly believes that filmmaker does not want to divert any attention to murder stuff, and that murder element is just a secondary thing.
I welcome any comments on my reasoning
Appreciate Kudos if it helps xD
Regards,
Saakhi
(C) whether the movie should be classified as a murder mystery
Yes, I think this is the correct one. First person clearly states that it is a requirement of murder mysteries that viewers be given clues to solve the mysteries. This first person thinks that the movie is indeed a murder mystery.
Second person, on the other hand, states that the filmmaker wanted to keep the murder thing as a side thing and his primary focus was something else. Clearly, in the second person's opinion, the movie is not a murder mystery as murder is a side element in the story.
(E) whether the filmmaker wanted viewers to be able to solve the murder
Wrong in my opinion.
First person simply states what are pre-requisites of a murder mystery. She never talks or implies that filmmaker "wanted" the viewers to be able to solve the mystery. So she cannot disagree with the second person on this topic.
Second person, on other hand, clearly believes that filmmaker does not want to divert any attention to murder stuff, and that murder element is just a secondary thing.
I welcome any comments on my reasoning
Appreciate Kudos if it helps xD
Regards,
Saakhi
12 Dec 2020, 02:38
Kudos
Bookmarks
Saasingh
Hi Saakshi,
C couldn't be the answer, I am just going with your reasoning of C.
"First-person clearly states that it is a requirement of murder mysteries that viewers be given clues to solve the mysteries. This first-person thinks that the movie is indeed a murder mystery."
So it means that First-person states that a movie cannot be classified as a Murder mystery. Clear logic.
But for 2nd person, he states that the Filmmaker wants us to focus on something else rather than the murder mystery. According to the second person, the movie could be a murder mystery/ couldn't be a murder mystery, it didn't tell us anything. In fact, if you can still assume for 2nd person as well that he didn't regard this movie as a murder mystery.
So both 1st and 2nd person basically just agree on C. But we have to find on which they disagree.
Thanks & Regards
Siddharth
