sid0791 wrote:
Saasingh wrote:
Clearly between C and E.
(C) whether the movie should be classified as a murder mysteryYes, I think this is the correct one. First person clearly states that it is a requirement of murder mysteries that viewers be given clues to solve the mysteries. This first person thinks that the movie is indeed a murder mystery.
Second person, on the other hand, states that the filmmaker wanted to keep the murder thing as a side thing and his primary focus was something else. Clearly, in the second person's opinion, the movie is not a murder mystery as murder is a side element in the story.
(E) whether the filmmaker wanted viewers to be able to solve the murderWrong in my opinion.
First person simply states what are pre-requisites of a murder mystery. She never talks or implies that filmmaker "wanted" the viewers to be able to solve the mystery. So she cannot disagree with the second person on this topic.
Second person, on other hand, clearly believes that filmmaker does not want to divert any attention to murder stuff, and that murder element is just a secondary thing.
I welcome any comments on my reasoning
Appreciate Kudos if it helps xD
Regards,
Saakhi
Hi Saakshi,
C couldn't be the answer, I am just going with your reasoning of C.
"First-person clearly states that it is a requirement of murder mysteries that viewers be given clues to solve the mysteries. This first-person thinks that the movie is indeed a murder mystery."
So it means that First-person states that a movie cannot be classified as a Murder mystery. Clear logic.
But for 2nd person, he states that the Filmmaker wants us to focus on something else rather than the murder mystery. According to the second person, the movie could be a murder mystery/ couldn't be a murder mystery, it didn't tell us anything. In fact, if you can still assume for 2nd person as well that he didn't regard this movie as a murder mystery.
So both 1st and 2nd person basically just agree on C. But we have to find on which they disagree.
Thanks & Regards
Siddharth
Hey Siddharth,
I disagree with this inference in your reasoning:
So it means that First-person states that a movie cannot be classified as a Murder mystery. Clear logic.
I actually think that the first person
agrees that the movie is indeed a murder mystery. Here's why :
Marife: That was a bad movie because, by not providing viewers with all the information necessary for solving the murder, it violated a requirement of murder mysteries.This first person clearly states that the movie
is a bad movie because it doesn't fulfill the requirement of murder mysteries.
That's only possible to say when she believes that movie WAS a murder mystery.
Imagine this : I say Anabelle is a bad movie as it didn't scare me.
Scaring is a pre-requisite of a horror movie. And in my opinion it's a bad film
as it didn't scare me.
Am I not implicitly assuming that Anabelle is a horror film ?So indeed first person believes that movie was murder mystery. Just that it was a "bad" murder mystery.
And second person believes murder mystery is a side element, so it is not a murder mystery.
That's how they disagree.
Also, option E is definitely wrong. First person nowhere implicitly or explicitly states what the filmmaker wants.
Regards,
Saakhi Singh