Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 02:45 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 02:45
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Hovkial
Joined: 23 Apr 2019
Last visit: 24 Nov 2022
Posts: 802
Own Kudos:
2,599
 [6]
Given Kudos: 202
Status:PhD trained. Education research, management.
Posts: 802
Kudos: 2,599
 [6]
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sid0791
Joined: 09 Aug 2020
Last visit: 28 Feb 2024
Posts: 81
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 81
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Saasingh
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 11 Apr 2020
Last visit: 06 Aug 2022
Posts: 388
Own Kudos:
266
 [1]
Given Kudos: 820
Status:Working hard
Location: India
GPA: 3.93
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Products:
Posts: 388
Kudos: 266
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sid0791
Joined: 09 Aug 2020
Last visit: 28 Feb 2024
Posts: 81
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 81
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Saasingh
Clearly between C and E.

(C) whether the movie should be classified as a murder mystery
Yes, I think this is the correct one. First person clearly states that it is a requirement of murder mysteries that viewers be given clues to solve the mysteries. This first person thinks that the movie is indeed a murder mystery.

Second person, on the other hand, states that the filmmaker wanted to keep the murder thing as a side thing and his primary focus was something else. Clearly, in the second person's opinion, the movie is not a murder mystery as murder is a side element in the story.

(E) whether the filmmaker wanted viewers to be able to solve the murder
Wrong in my opinion.
First person simply states what are pre-requisites of a murder mystery. She never talks or implies that filmmaker "wanted" the viewers to be able to solve the mystery. So she cannot disagree with the second person on this topic.
Second person, on other hand, clearly believes that filmmaker does not want to divert any attention to murder stuff, and that murder element is just a secondary thing.

I welcome any comments on my reasoning :)

Appreciate Kudos if it helps xD

Regards,
Saakhi

Hi Saakshi,

C couldn't be the answer, I am just going with your reasoning of C.

"First-person clearly states that it is a requirement of murder mysteries that viewers be given clues to solve the mysteries. This first-person thinks that the movie is indeed a murder mystery."

So it means that First-person states that a movie cannot be classified as a Murder mystery. Clear logic.

But for 2nd person, he states that the Filmmaker wants us to focus on something else rather than the murder mystery. According to the second person, the movie could be a murder mystery/ couldn't be a murder mystery, it didn't tell us anything. In fact, if you can still assume for 2nd person as well that he didn't regard this movie as a murder mystery.

So both 1st and 2nd person basically just agree on C. But we have to find on which they disagree.

Thanks & Regards
Siddharth
User avatar
Saasingh
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 11 Apr 2020
Last visit: 06 Aug 2022
Posts: 388
Own Kudos:
266
 [2]
Given Kudos: 820
Status:Working hard
Location: India
GPA: 3.93
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Products:
Posts: 388
Kudos: 266
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sid0791
Saasingh
Clearly between C and E.

(C) whether the movie should be classified as a murder mystery
Yes, I think this is the correct one. First person clearly states that it is a requirement of murder mysteries that viewers be given clues to solve the mysteries. This first person thinks that the movie is indeed a murder mystery.

Second person, on the other hand, states that the filmmaker wanted to keep the murder thing as a side thing and his primary focus was something else. Clearly, in the second person's opinion, the movie is not a murder mystery as murder is a side element in the story.

(E) whether the filmmaker wanted viewers to be able to solve the murder
Wrong in my opinion.
First person simply states what are pre-requisites of a murder mystery. She never talks or implies that filmmaker "wanted" the viewers to be able to solve the mystery. So she cannot disagree with the second person on this topic.
Second person, on other hand, clearly believes that filmmaker does not want to divert any attention to murder stuff, and that murder element is just a secondary thing.

I welcome any comments on my reasoning :)

Appreciate Kudos if it helps xD

Regards,
Saakhi

Hi Saakshi,

C couldn't be the answer, I am just going with your reasoning of C.

"First-person clearly states that it is a requirement of murder mysteries that viewers be given clues to solve the mysteries. This first-person thinks that the movie is indeed a murder mystery."

So it means that First-person states that a movie cannot be classified as a Murder mystery. Clear logic.

But for 2nd person, he states that the Filmmaker wants us to focus on something else rather than the murder mystery. According to the second person, the movie could be a murder mystery/ couldn't be a murder mystery, it didn't tell us anything. In fact, if you can still assume for 2nd person as well that he didn't regard this movie as a murder mystery.

So both 1st and 2nd person basically just agree on C. But we have to find on which they disagree.

Thanks & Regards
Siddharth


Hey Siddharth,

I disagree with this inference in your reasoning: So it means that First-person states that a movie cannot be classified as a Murder mystery. Clear logic.

I actually think that the first person agrees that the movie is indeed a murder mystery. Here's why :

Marife: That was a bad movie because, by not providing viewers with all the information necessary for solving the murder, it violated a requirement of murder mysteries.

This first person clearly states that the movie is a bad movie because it doesn't fulfill the requirement of murder mysteries. That's only possible to say when she believes that movie WAS a murder mystery.

Imagine this : I say Anabelle is a bad movie as it didn't scare me. Scaring is a pre-requisite of a horror movie. And in my opinion it's a bad film as it didn't scare me.
Am I not implicitly assuming that Anabelle is a horror film ?

So indeed first person believes that movie was murder mystery. Just that it was a "bad" murder mystery.
And second person believes murder mystery is a side element, so it is not a murder mystery.

That's how they disagree.

Also, option E is definitely wrong. First person nowhere implicitly or explicitly states what the filmmaker wants.

Regards,
Saakhi Singh
User avatar
rsrighosh
Joined: 13 Jun 2019
Last visit: 11 Dec 2022
Posts: 184
Own Kudos:
137
 [1]
Given Kudos: 645
GMAT 1: 490 Q42 V17
GMAT 2: 550 Q39 V27
GMAT 3: 630 Q49 V27
GMAT 3: 630 Q49 V27
Posts: 184
Kudos: 137
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Saasingh
I agree with you.
Both persons disagree on the movie genre
First guy thinks it is a murder mystery story.
2nd guy thinks this is a movie on developing complex relationship between 2 protagonists and murder mystery is used as plot to narrate the main story

my answer is also C
User avatar
AnirudhaS
User avatar
LBS Moderator
Joined: 30 Oct 2019
Last visit: 25 Jun 2024
Posts: 779
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,575
Posts: 779
Kudos: 887
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
for me between A or C.
Maybe C...
User avatar
CEdward
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Last visit: 14 Apr 2022
Posts: 1,162
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 332
Posts: 1,162
Kudos: 289
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Don't know if I am fully satisfied with C.

Nguyen doesn't actually disagree about the movie's classification per se...he/she simply says that the murder shouldn't be the defining characteristic...it's a backdrop to the complex relationship. But saying something is secondary IS NOT the same as denying what the proper classification is.

E seems appropriate because we can infer in both cases that there is a disagreement about the intent behind the movie.

Tricky...what do others think?
User avatar
8Harshitsharma
Joined: 25 Oct 2017
Last visit: 06 Jul 2025
Posts: 127
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 723
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q87 V80 DI80
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GRE 1: Q165 V160
GRE 2: Q170 V162
GPA: 9.25
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q87 V80 DI80
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GRE 1: Q165 V160
GRE 2: Q170 V162
Posts: 127
Kudos: 160
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Choice D seems correct to me here, Nguyen argues that the murder part is sideline - so it is not appropriate to try finding the clues that all murder movies must meet. Marife clearly thinks this is right and she does it as we see in the argument.

Choice C seems incorrect because by saying that the movie violates the criteria of a murder mystery, Marife can be thought to agree that it is indeed not a murder mystery.
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 11 Apr 2026
Posts: 5,632
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 707
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,632
Kudos: 33,428
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­Hi 8Harshitsharma

Happy to discuss.
Quote:
 Marife: That was a bad movie because, by not providing viewers with all the information necessary for solving the murder, it violated a requirement of murder mysteries.
This means that Marife classifies the movie as a "Murder Mystery". We can infer this from the fact that Marife is evaluating the quality of the movie by measuring it against the requirements of murder mysteries. 
Quote:
 Nguyen: But the filmmaker wanted viewers to focus on the complex relationship between the chief detective and her assistant. The murder just provided the context in which the relationship developed, and should not be taken as a defining characteristic of the film.
By saying that the main focus was the "complex relationship between the detective and her assistant" and that "the murder just provided context", Nguyen implies that this is not a "Murder Mystery" in the first place. So, Nguyen does NOT disagree/debate with Marife on what constitutes a good "murder mystery". Nguyen merely suggests that Marife should not be evaluating this movie as a 'murder mystery' in the first place. 
Quote:
 Marife's and Nguyen's comments indicate that they disagree about:
Choice C: whether the movie should be classified as a murder mystery
  • Correct: This is precisely the point of disagreement as explained above. 

Choice D: the appropriateness of trying to find criteria that all mystery movies must meet
  • Incorrect: This would have been possible if they both agreed that the movie was a murder mystery and were debating what makes a murder mystery good or bad. They clearly disagree on whether the movie should even be classified as a murder myster.  

Hope this clarifies.
Happy learning! 

-Abhishek 

 ­
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,400
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,400
Kudos: 1,009
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
494 posts
358 posts