Last visit was: 21 May 2024, 14:11 It is currently 21 May 2024, 14:11
Toolkit
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

# National Park Ranger: Young people are missing out on important

SORT BY:
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 93373
Own Kudos [?]: 625613 [2]
Given Kudos: 81918
Director
Joined: 29 Oct 2015
Posts: 728
Own Kudos [?]: 333 [1]
Given Kudos: 476
Manager
Joined: 21 Jan 2020
Posts: 101
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [2]
Given Kudos: 346
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 93373
Own Kudos [?]: 625613 [0]
Given Kudos: 81918
Re: National Park Ranger: Young people are missing out on important [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
­National Park Ranger: Young people are missing out on important opportunities to appreciate nature. While members of older generations spend hours and even days in our park, younger people simply stop by long enough to take the perfect photograph and then move on.

Which of the following is a required assumption of the park ranger's argument?

A) Younger people whose visits to the park consist of a quick photograph seldom look at that photograph after they have left the park.

B) People who spend multiple days at the park spend the majority of their time appreciating nature.

C) Members of older generations did not spend considerably less time in the park during their visits in their younger years.

D) Younger people are the only visitors to the park whose visits last just long enough to take a photograph.

E) The amount of time one spends in a park is a reliable measure of how much one appreciated nature on that visit.

­
This is a CR Butler Question

Check the links to other Butler Projects:

­

­

Veritas Prep Official Explanation

Like many Strengthen, Weaken, or Assumption questions, this problem heavily rewards those who notice the major gap between the wording in the conclusion (which is about appreciating nature) and the wording in the premise(s) (which here is all about time spent in the park). Does time spent = appreciation? That is the wording gap in play here: if time spent is not a valid measure of appreciation, then the argument is totally disconnected. If it is a good measure of appreciation, then the argument much more logically flows.

For that reason, choice E is correct. If you hold it up to the Assumption Negation Technique, you'll see that the negated version is "time spent is NOT a reliable measure of appreciation" which then means that the only premise (younger people don't spend much time at the park) no longer supports the conclusion.

Choice A may very well seem relevant ("but what if they look at the pictures later?") but requires an additional assumption, that "looking at pictures" = appreciation.

Choice B may also look tempting, but if you hold it up to the Assumption Negation Technique, note that even if "people who spend multiple days at the park spend less than half their time appreciating nature" they can still spend a lot more time than "just long enough to take a picture" appreciating nature, so you can see that the negated assumption does not cripple the argument.

Choice C misses the scope of the conclusion, which is only about young people currently missing out on opportunities to appreciate nature. C would be helpful if the conclusion was more about a comparison between generations, but the conclusion as written is specific to current young people so this comparative answer choice isn't relevant.

And choice D is also incorrect, as you can see from holding it up to the Assumption Negation Technique: even if young people are NOT the only people whose visits are so brief, their visits ARE still brief so you haven't changed the nature of the argument by negating the assumption Therefore, the assumption is not required: whether it's true or the opposite is true has no bearing on the argument.­
Re: National Park Ranger: Young people are missing out on important [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6936 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts