nevergiveup
Noting that the Federal Reserve had raised a key short-term interest rate against last month, analysts said that they expected orders for durable goods to decline soon because rising interest rates makes it more expensive to buy them on credit.
(A) rising interest rates makes it more expensive to buy them on credit
(B) rising interest rates make buying on credit more expensive
(C) a rise in interest rates make it more expensive to buy on credit
(D) a rise in interest rates make buying on credit more expensive
(E) a rise in interest rates makes it more expensive for them to be bought on credit
adizephyr
Can someone explain if there is a strong enough reason to eliminate option E beacause of pronoun ambiguity??
Posted from my mobile device
adizephyr , belated welcome to GMAT Club.
Sidebar: The original version of the answer choices was edited. (I can tell from Tommy Wallach's explanation. Now option B does not include the pronoun THEM.)
Yes,
adizephyr , the "strong enough reason" to eliminate E based on pronoun ambiguity is cemented by the absence of
them in option B.
• First, in general, GMAC strongly prefers that pronouns of the same form (third person plural) refer to the same noun.
A few exceptions exist.
In the non-underlined portion,
they refers to
analystsTypically,
them would follow suit and refer to
analysts, but that connection is absurd. Analysts are not bought on credit.
The only logical antecedent for
them is
durable goods.
Analyzed in isolation, it is not 100% clear whether pronoun ambiguity is "enough" to eliminate E.
If I were analyzing based on pronoun clarity alone, I would hold E until I compared it with another answer.
• Second, option B, which is grammatical and logical, does not include
them, thus avoiding the pronoun issue.
If B contained a clear grammatical error or conveyed illogical or nonsensical meaning, then we could argue that the noun antecedent
durable goods is the only logical candidate for
them in option E
But (B) presents no such issue.
Choose B because it is grammatical, logical, and because it avoids this pronoun issue.
Hope that analysis helps.