Last visit was: 20 Jul 2025, 12:15 It is currently 20 Jul 2025, 12:15
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
vaivish1723
Joined: 12 Mar 2009
Last visit: 18 May 2010
Posts: 216
Own Kudos:
2,797
 [32]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 216
Kudos: 2,797
 [32]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
30
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATaddict
Joined: 15 May 2009
Last visit: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 90
Own Kudos:
72
 [3]
Given Kudos: 3
 Q44  V44
Posts: 90
Kudos: 72
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bigoyal
Joined: 03 Jun 2009
Last visit: 08 Jul 2011
Posts: 577
Own Kudos:
2,382
 [3]
Given Kudos: 56
Location: New Delhi
Concentration: IT Consultancy
 Q50  V38
WE 1: 5.5 yrs in IT
Posts: 577
Kudos: 2,382
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
BarneyStinson
Joined: 21 Jul 2009
Last visit: 24 Sep 2010
Posts: 217
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 22
Concentration: World Domination, Finance, Political Corporatization, Marketing, Strategy
Schools:LBS, INSEAD, IMD, ISB - Anything with just 1 yr program.
 Q47  V32
Posts: 217
Kudos: 491
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
SudiptoGmat
One of the more reliable methods of determining regional climatic conditions in prehistoric periods is to examine plant pollen trapped in glacial ice during ancient times. By comparing such pollen samples with spores taken from modern vegetation, scientists can figure out approximately what the weather was like at the time of pollen deposition. Furthermore, by submitting the prehistoric samples to radiocarbon dating techniques, we can also determine when certain climatic conditions were prevalent in that portion of the globe.
Which one of the following may be inferred from the information in the passage?
(A) The earth has undergone several glacial periods.
(B) Radiocarbon dating can be corroborated by glacial evidence.
(C) Similarities between prehistoric and contemporary climates do not exist.

Option A is too much of an inference, the passage does not discuss the possibility of several glacial periods. It only discusses that weather conditions might have been different.
Option C is too strong by saying that similarities do not exist at all. The passage only discusses how to compare weather conditions using pollen data.

Having eliminated two out of the three options given, I guess, I'll go with B. The additional premise that starts with "Furthermore" is a good indication that we are flowing in the proper direction.
User avatar
onedayill
Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Last visit: 08 Mar 2017
Posts: 207
Own Kudos:
336
 [1]
Given Kudos: 10
Posts: 207
Kudos: 336
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) we can't infer about "glacial periods".
(B) carbon dating tell us WHEN that climate was prevalent not type of climate
(D) don't know how often we find it in the glaciers.

(E) By POE, this is the only choice left.

climate can be determined by examining frozen prehistoric pollen,
certain plants must be reliable indicators of climate/weather existed in given region.
User avatar
ykaiim
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Last visit: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 519
Own Kudos:
5,822
 [2]
Given Kudos: 40
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Posts: 519
Kudos: 5,822
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Lets solve this CR with the CR Bible strategies:

The structure of the argument is:
Premise + Conclusion + Additional Premise
(One of the more, by comparing) + (scientists can figure out) + furthermore

So, we can rearrnage the parts as:
Premise + Additional Premise + Conclusion

Premise: One of the more reliable methods of determining regional climatic conditions in prehistoric periods is to examine plant pollen trapped in glacial ice during ancient times.

Additional Premise: Furthermore, by submitting the prehistoric samples to radiocarbon dating techniques, we can also determine when certain climatic conditions were prevalent in that portion of the globe.

Conclusion:
Scientists can figure out approximately what the weather was like at the time of pollen deposition.

We can say an inference is like a Must be True statement based on the stimulus given. So, any answer choice rephrasing any of the above premise/additional premise/conclusion and avoiding new info will be the correct answer.

Now, lets check the given options:

(A) The earth has undergone several glacial periods. [No mention of Several glaciers. [New info based option. Incorrect]

(B) Radiocarbon dating can be corroborated by glacial evidence. [This is a Reverse case trap. Radiocarbon dating and glacial evidence are stated in the stimulus but in different context. Incorrect]

(C) Similarities between prehistoric and contemporary climates do not exist.
[This is Opposite case. Read the conclusion and additional premise. Incorrect]

(D) Pollen deposition is a fairly continuous process.
[No mention of such process. New info. Incorrect]]

(E) Certain flora are reliably associated with particular climatic conditions.
This is just the prephased version of the conclusion. Correct.

So, OA is E.
User avatar
nonameee
Joined: 23 Apr 2010
Last visit: 30 Sep 2013
Posts: 476
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 476
Kudos: 382
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone please explain what I'm missing here?

The stimulus talks about examining plant pollen. (E) talks about flora. How can (E) be the correct answer????

IMO (B) is the correct answer because this is exactly what the stimulus says:

Furthermore, by submitting the prehistoric samples to radiocarbon dating techniques, we can also determine when certain climatic conditions were prevalent in that portion of the globe.
User avatar
metallicafan
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Last visit: 26 Aug 2020
Posts: 760
Own Kudos:
4,302
 [1]
Given Kudos: 109
Status:2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Location: Peru
Concentration: Finance, SMEs, Developing countries, Public sector and non profit organizations
Schools:Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
GPA: 4.0
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Posts: 760
Kudos: 4,302
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
+1 E

Choice E is correct because of this premise in the argument:

"By comparing such pollen samples with spores taken from modern vegetation, scientists can figure out approximately what the weather was like at the time of pollen deposition".
So, certain type of polen is related with some climatic conditions.
User avatar
swagatamoitra
Joined: 05 Sep 2016
Last visit: 05 Mar 2019
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 295
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
WE:Engineering (Energy)
Posts: 24
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) The earth has undergone several glacial periods- Out of Scope
(B) Radiocarbon dating can be corroborated by glacial evidence-
(C) Similarities between prehistoric and contemporary climates do not exist- wrong conclusion
(D) Pollen deposition is a fairly continuous process- Inconsequential
(E) Certain flora are reliably associated with particular climatic conditions- inference drawn from the premises as the whole passage is dependent on the fact that pollen from floras can indicate climate.
User avatar
pytha1gurus
Joined: 11 Mar 2014
Last visit: 30 Nov 2023
Posts: 339
Own Kudos:
115
 [1]
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 339
Kudos: 115
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The basic approach to solve the inference questions is
1. Read the question
2. Work the argument- Identify the facts provided in the argument
3. Do effective process of elimination
A. Eliminate answers which have extreme language. Author is the boss of the argument, and any claim which is stronger than the claim made by the author can’t function as the right answer. The student should be always suspicious about answer choices which have words like all, always, none, only, must, never etc.
B. Eliminate answer choices which are beyond the scope of the argument.
Let’s try to attempt this question
It is an inference question
Let’s see the facts provided – Psychiatric problems in adults can be dealt with observing their childhood events. Some events during childhood leave a strong impression. The doctors can get a lot of clarity about patients’ insecurities and fears which will help in dealing with psychiatric disorders.
Now let us do process of elimination
A. This answer choice is out of scope
B. This answer is extreme in nature
C. The discussion does not draw similarities.
D. This answer choice is again out of scope.
E. This is supported from the facts provided. It serves as the right answer.
Keep practicing. Consistency is the key.
PythaGURUS Faculty Team
User avatar
Aviral1995
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Apr 2019
Last visit: 23 May 2022
Posts: 233
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 309
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V36
GPA: 3.85
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nonameee
Can someone please explain what I'm missing here?

The stimulus talks about examining plant pollen. (E) talks about flora. How can (E) be the correct answer????

IMO (B) is the correct answer because this is exactly what the stimulus says:

Furthermore, by submitting the prehistoric samples to radiocarbon dating techniques, we can also determine when certain climatic conditions were prevalent in that portion of the globe.

Option B says the reverse. It says radiocarbon dating can be supported by glacial evidence, however from the argument it can be inferred that radiocarbon dating can be used to support glacial evidence
User avatar
Fdambro294
Joined: 10 Jul 2019
Last visit: 06 Apr 2025
Posts: 1,353
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,658
Posts: 1,353
Kudos: 707
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think there are a few, easily missed words that separate the correct answer E from the wrong answer B.

First, this is an Inference question. Quite often the passage will be a collection of facts rather than the normal premise + author’s conclusion structure in other questions.

We are told there is a pretty reliable way to determine the climate conditions in prehistoric times.

The passage then goes out of its way to separate the next 2 facts.

1st, we are told that pollen trapped in ice is compared to “spores of modern vegetation. This can tell us approximately WHAT the weather was like when the pollen froze in the ice.

FURTHERMORE, the pollen can ALSO be submitted to radio carbon dating to determine WHEN such climate conditions occurred in that portion of the globe.

Both of these parts encompass “one of the more reliable” techniques for determining prehistoric climate conditions.

B says that one corroborates the other. We are not told whether this is true anywhere in the facts.

However, if E were not true, does it go against the Facts stated?

In order for this method of comparing frozen, prehistoric pollen to “modern spores on vegetation” to be reliable, it must be true that certain flora/vegetation are associated with certain climate conditions (to a reasonable degree).

How else could scientists compare these frozen pollen samples to modern plants and say, approximately, WHAT the climate conditions were at the time the pollen froze? The scientists are after all using the modern vegetation spores as a basis of comparison to make this determination.

E must be true for this entire process to be considered “one of the more reliable” ways to determine what the climate was at the time the pollen froze.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
bidskamikaze
Joined: 07 Jan 2018
Last visit: 29 Oct 2022
Posts: 262
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 160
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Posts: 262
Kudos: 289
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vaivish1723
One of the more reliable methods of determining regional climatic conditions in prehistoric periods is to examine plant pollen trapped in glacial ice during ancient times. By comparing such pollen samples with spores taken from modern vegetation, scientists can figure out approximately what the weather was like at the time of pollen deposition. Furthermore, by submitting the prehistoric samples to radiocarbon dating techniques, we can also determine when certain climatic conditions were prevalent in that portion of the globe.

Which one of the following may be inferred from the information in the passage?

(A) The earth has undergone several glacial periods.
(B) Radiocarbon dating can be corroborated by glacial evidence.
(C) Similarities between prehistoric and contemporary climates do not exist.
(D) Pollen deposition is a fairly continuous process.
(E) Certain flora are reliably associated with particular climatic conditions.

Tough question. :roll:

(A) The earth has undergone several glacial periods.
- Not necessary. There is nothing in the passage to suggest this.

(B) Radiocarbon dating can be corroborated by glacial evidence.
- Tricky. Notice that it is actually the other way round: glacial evidence can be corroborated by Radiocarbon dating.

(C) Similarities between prehistoric and contemporary climates do not exist.
- This could be a possible result of the investigation, but we don't know if this WILL be the result. So, this can't be inferred.

(D) Pollen deposition is a fairly continuous process.
- Not necessary. We don't know anything about continuity.

(E) Certain flora are reliably associated with particular climatic conditions.
- Correct. The whole point of the passage is to investigate the climatic conditions thru trapped pollen. This implies that certain flora (pollen) are reliably associated with particular climatic conditions.

Answer E.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,459
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,459
Kudos: 957
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7359 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts