Forum Home > GMAT > Quantitative > Problem Solving (PS)
Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Oct 2410:00 AM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
This Halloween, get 20% off any Target Test Prep GMAT plan. Just use the coupon code HALLOWEEN20 at checkout to save up to $320.
Oct 2910:00 AM PDT
-07:30 AM PDT
Scary Savings Alert! Prepare with up to 44% off on our plans and score 99th %ile on GMAT Focus. Claim this fa-BOO-lous deal & get access to a personalized study plan, 100+ video lessons, 5 mocks & more at prices starting $149. Hurry up!
Oct 3112:01 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
On Thursday the 31st, GMAT Club Tests will be Absolutely Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PST
Oct 3111:00 AM EDT
-11:00 PM EDT
Save 20% on Target Test Prep and get a perfect score like Julia. Through Thursday, October 31, get an EXTRA 20% OFF any Target Test Prep GMAT plan by using the coupon code HALLOWEEN20 at checkout.
Oct 3101:30 PM IST
-11:30 PM IST
With brand new features like:AI-driven Planner tool, 850+ data Insights practice questions and GMAT Focus Edition Adaptive mock tests with ESR+ analysis and personal mentor support, our course is the most comprehensive course for GMAT Focus Edition.- Nov 02
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this session to learn how to Deconstruct arguments, Pre-Think Author’s Assumptions, and apply Negation Test. - Nov 03
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 0311:30 AM EST
-12:30 PM EST
Is INSEAD your dream b-school and you're looking for solid prep and application strategies to get there? Check out Barkavi’s end-to-end journey to know how she did! Get insights into the INSEAD admissions process, know what Adcoms look at, and more!- Nov 13
05:30 AM PST
-06:00 PM PST
We are excited to bring you the Fall edition of the MBA Spotlight Fair! Meet admission officers from the top 20 MBA programs—including HBS, Stanford, and Wharton—as you prepare for Round 2 applications.
05 Jul 2023, 04:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
hello Sajjad1994,
For question 6 I am not understanding why option A is wrong, I was confused between A and D, both looked right to me
In these lines
" Cancer, it seems, was becoming increasingly frequent in New England, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Switzerland, where a lot of milk is produced and consumed, while remaining rare in Ceylon, where milk is scarce. "
The passage states cancer is common among english societies where milk availability & consumption is high but wrt to ceylon milk is scarce.
Now if we go by option A "Ceylonese drink more milk than English" by this cancer should be frequent among ceylonese but since it is rare (as per the passage) this contradicts the correlation between milk and cancer. I'm not sure why author would reject this statement, which indeed helps to bolster his argument.
Kindly help me where I am going wrong.
Thanks in advance.
For question 6 I am not understanding why option A is wrong, I was confused between A and D, both looked right to me
In these lines
" Cancer, it seems, was becoming increasingly frequent in New England, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Switzerland, where a lot of milk is produced and consumed, while remaining rare in Ceylon, where milk is scarce. "
The passage states cancer is common among english societies where milk availability & consumption is high but wrt to ceylon milk is scarce.
Now if we go by option A "Ceylonese drink more milk than English" by this cancer should be frequent among ceylonese but since it is rare (as per the passage) this contradicts the correlation between milk and cancer. I'm not sure why author would reject this statement, which indeed helps to bolster his argument.
Kindly help me where I am going wrong.
Thanks in advance.
05 Jul 2023, 14:02
Kudos
Bookmarks
Vishal_Jain
hello Sajjad1994,
For question 6 I am not understanding why option A is wrong, I was confused between A and D, both looked right to me
In these lines
" Cancer, it seems, was becoming increasingly frequent in New England, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Switzerland, where a lot of milk is produced and consumed, while remaining rare in Ceylon, where milk is scarce. "
The passage states cancer is common among english societies where milk availability & consumption is high but wrt to ceylon milk is scarce.
Now if we go by option A "Ceylonese drink more milk than English" by this cancer should be frequent among ceylonese but since it is rare (as per the passage) this contradicts the correlation between milk and cancer. I'm not sure why author would reject this statement, which indeed helps to bolster his argument.
Kindly help me where I am going wrong.
Thanks in advance.
For question 6 I am not understanding why option A is wrong, I was confused between A and D, both looked right to me
In these lines
" Cancer, it seems, was becoming increasingly frequent in New England, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Switzerland, where a lot of milk is produced and consumed, while remaining rare in Ceylon, where milk is scarce. "
The passage states cancer is common among english societies where milk availability & consumption is high but wrt to ceylon milk is scarce.
Now if we go by option A "Ceylonese drink more milk than English" by this cancer should be frequent among ceylonese but since it is rare (as per the passage) this contradicts the correlation between milk and cancer. I'm not sure why author would reject this statement, which indeed helps to bolster his argument.
Kindly help me where I am going wrong.
Thanks in advance.
Explanation
6. The author would reject all the following statements about cause-effect relationships as explanations for the statistics that show an increase in cancer rates EXCEPT that the
Difficulty Level: 700+
Explanation
(A) Ceylonese drink more milk than the English:
This statement suggests that Ceylonese people (people from Sri Lanka) consume more milk than the English. The passage mentions that cancer rates are less frequent in Ceylon, where milk is scarce. While the author doesn't explicitly reject this statement as an explanation, it is not a central argument in the passage. The focus is more on the correlation between milk consumption and cancer rates in different regions.
(B) Swiss produce and consume large quantities of dairy products:
This statement indicates that the Swiss produce and consume significant amounts of dairy products. The passage mentions Switzerland as one of the regions where cancer rates are increasing and highlights the correlation with milk consumption. The author argues that the longer life spans of the population in Switzerland, rather than milk consumption alone, could be a factor in the increased cancer rates. The passage does not explicitly reject this statement as an explanation for the statistics.
(C) Women of New England drink more milk than the women who live in some states of the southern United States:
This statement suggests that women in New England consume more milk than women in certain states in the southern United States. The passage mentions New England as one of the regions where cancer rates are increasing and refers to the correlation between milk consumption and cancer rates. The author does not explicitly reject this statement as an explanation for the statistics.
(D) People of Wisconsin have relatively high life expectancies:
This statement states that people in Wisconsin have relatively high life expectancies. The passage discusses the correlation between longer life spans in certain regions and the increase in cancer rates. However, the author rejects the idea that high cancer rates in those regions are solely due to milk consumption. The passage does explicitly reject this statement as an explanation for the statistics.
(E) People who live in some states of the southern United States have relatively high life expectancies:
This statement suggests that people who live in certain states of the southern United States have relatively high life expectancies. The passage discusses the correlation between longer life spans in certain regions and the increase in cancer rates. While the author does not explicitly reject this statement as an explanation, it is not a central argument in the passage.
To summarize, options (A), (B), (C), and (E) are not explicitly rejected by the author as explanations for the increase in cancer rates. Only option (D) is explicitly rejected as an explanation in the passage.
Answer: D
Difficulty Level: 700+
Explanation
(A) Ceylonese drink more milk than the English:
This statement suggests that Ceylonese people (people from Sri Lanka) consume more milk than the English. The passage mentions that cancer rates are less frequent in Ceylon, where milk is scarce. While the author doesn't explicitly reject this statement as an explanation, it is not a central argument in the passage. The focus is more on the correlation between milk consumption and cancer rates in different regions.
(B) Swiss produce and consume large quantities of dairy products:
This statement indicates that the Swiss produce and consume significant amounts of dairy products. The passage mentions Switzerland as one of the regions where cancer rates are increasing and highlights the correlation with milk consumption. The author argues that the longer life spans of the population in Switzerland, rather than milk consumption alone, could be a factor in the increased cancer rates. The passage does not explicitly reject this statement as an explanation for the statistics.
(C) Women of New England drink more milk than the women who live in some states of the southern United States:
This statement suggests that women in New England consume more milk than women in certain states in the southern United States. The passage mentions New England as one of the regions where cancer rates are increasing and refers to the correlation between milk consumption and cancer rates. The author does not explicitly reject this statement as an explanation for the statistics.
(D) People of Wisconsin have relatively high life expectancies:
This statement states that people in Wisconsin have relatively high life expectancies. The passage discusses the correlation between longer life spans in certain regions and the increase in cancer rates. However, the author rejects the idea that high cancer rates in those regions are solely due to milk consumption. The passage does explicitly reject this statement as an explanation for the statistics.
(E) People who live in some states of the southern United States have relatively high life expectancies:
This statement suggests that people who live in certain states of the southern United States have relatively high life expectancies. The passage discusses the correlation between longer life spans in certain regions and the increase in cancer rates. While the author does not explicitly reject this statement as an explanation, it is not a central argument in the passage.
To summarize, options (A), (B), (C), and (E) are not explicitly rejected by the author as explanations for the increase in cancer rates. Only option (D) is explicitly rejected as an explanation in the passage.
Answer: D
12 Jul 2023, 10:23
Kudos
Bookmarks
Sajjad1994 - In the below question, why would option E be incorrect. Doesn't option B also imply that the reason for low incidence of cancer might not be milk consumption, but higher life expectancy?
[quote="Sajjad1994"]
[textarea]6. The author would reject all the following statements about cause-effect relationships as explanations for the statistics that show an increase in cancer rates EXCEPT that the
Difficulty Level: 750
Explanation
One reason this question is hard is the question statement itself, it looks somehow confusing. One can easily get trapped by not paying attention to what actually the question is demanding. This is an EXCEPT question but with a different statement. The question asks us " which of the following is not the silly example of the cause of cancer?"
(A) Ceylonese drink more milk than the English
This is incorrect as this is given in the passage as one of the silly causes of cancer.
(B) Swiss produce and consume large quantities of dairy products
Same as (A)
(C) Women of New England drink more milk than the women who live in some states of the southern United States
Same as (A) and (B)
(D) People of Wisconsin have relatively high life expectancies
Hmm! this seems a serious talent, lets find it support from the passage:
In the first paragraph it is mentioned:
A medical article once pointed with great alarm to an increase in cancer among milk drinkers. Cancer, it seems, was becoming increasingly frequent in New England, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Switzerland, where a lot of milk is produced and consumed.
In Wisconsin, if the consumption of milk is high then why do people of Wisconsin have relatively high life expectancies? so this is the discrepancy that is out of the box and which negates the silly reasons given in the passage.
(E) People who live in some states of the southern United States have relatively high life expectancies
Incorrect.
[quote="Sajjad1994"]
Explanation
[textarea]6. The author would reject all the following statements about cause-effect relationships as explanations for the statistics that show an increase in cancer rates EXCEPT that the
Difficulty Level: 750
Explanation
One reason this question is hard is the question statement itself, it looks somehow confusing. One can easily get trapped by not paying attention to what actually the question is demanding. This is an EXCEPT question but with a different statement. The question asks us " which of the following is not the silly example of the cause of cancer?"
(A) Ceylonese drink more milk than the English
This is incorrect as this is given in the passage as one of the silly causes of cancer.
(B) Swiss produce and consume large quantities of dairy products
Same as (A)
(C) Women of New England drink more milk than the women who live in some states of the southern United States
Same as (A) and (B)
(D) People of Wisconsin have relatively high life expectancies
Hmm! this seems a serious talent, lets find it support from the passage:
In the first paragraph it is mentioned:
A medical article once pointed with great alarm to an increase in cancer among milk drinkers. Cancer, it seems, was becoming increasingly frequent in New England, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Switzerland, where a lot of milk is produced and consumed.
In Wisconsin, if the consumption of milk is high then why do people of Wisconsin have relatively high life expectancies? so this is the discrepancy that is out of the box and which negates the silly reasons given in the passage.
(E) People who live in some states of the southern United States have relatively high life expectancies
Incorrect.
