Last visit was: 31 Oct 2024, 17:06 It is currently 31 Oct 2024, 17:06
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Dhruv0911
Joined: 05 Dec 2022
Last visit: 08 Jun 2024
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
73
 [2]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: India
Posts: 8
Kudos: 73
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 31 Oct 2024
Posts: 15,420
Own Kudos:
69,198
 [5]
Given Kudos: 446
Location: Pune, India
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 15,420
Kudos: 69,198
 [5]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
shashank7874
Joined: 19 Jul 2023
Last visit: 21 Oct 2024
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
frappuchino
Joined: 17 Dec 2022
Last visit: 19 Apr 2024
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
27
 [1]
Given Kudos: 882
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
GMAT 1: 710 Q47 V40
GPA: 3.2
WE:Public Relations (Real Estate)
GMAT 1: 710 Q47 V40
Posts: 25
Kudos: 27
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shashank7874
Since it’s slightly unclear if elections were held first or the survey was conducted first. Any chances of E being the answer?

Posted from my mobile device

I'd like to know too. I chose E too, but E seems to be one of the least preferred answers
User avatar
Paras96
Joined: 11 Sep 2022
Last visit: 30 Dec 2023
Posts: 495
Own Kudos:
212
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Location: India
Paras: Bhawsar
GMAT 1: 590 Q47 V24
GMAT 2: 580 Q49 V21
GMAT 3: 700 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.2
WE:Project Management (Other)
GMAT 1: 590 Q47 V24
GMAT 2: 580 Q49 V21
GMAT 3: 700 Q49 V35
Posts: 495
Kudos: 212
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO B

B) Only eligible voters who did not choose to vote in the most recent election were included in the recent survey.

This justifies the paradox.
User avatar
rickyric395
Joined: 07 Mar 2020
Last visit: 31 Oct 2024
Posts: 112
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 55
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Posts: 112
Kudos: 71
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB, GMATNinja, AndrewN
OA is B, but B should be eliminated as it needs further assumption that those eligible voters who did not took part in survey did not agree with those who took part. Then only they could have took part in election.
Whereas A says Whereas A says that even though candidates are corrupt but people had to vote atleast 1 candidate
User avatar
sayan640
Joined: 29 Oct 2015
Last visit: 28 Oct 2024
Posts: 1,234
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 754
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Products:
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Posts: 1,234
Kudos: 588
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB , Can you please share your thought on option A ?
KarishmaB
Dhruv0911
Virtually all eligible voters who took part in a recent survey of political attitudes in Artesiana stated that because political candidates from the major parties are incompetent or corrupt (or both), it is a complete waste of time to vote in Artesianan elections. Yet nearly 80% of eligible voters chose to vote in the most recent Artesianan election.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the seeming paradox?

A) Eligible voters who chose to vote in the most recent election were compelled to vote for at least one candidate they knew to be incompetent or corrupt (or both).

B) Only eligible voters who did not choose to vote in the most recent election were included in the recent survey.

C) All eligible voters who took part in the recent survey gave truthful answers that accurately reflect their views concerning politics.

D) Candidates from some major political parties are competent but corrupt, whereas candidates from other parties are incompetent but honest.

E) Those voters who took part in the recent survey acted in accordance with their beliefs by refusing to waste time voting in the recent elections.
Observations:
A survey was conducted.
Virtually all eligible voters who took part in the survey said that candidates are incompetent or corrupt (or both), so it is a waste of time to vote.
Yet nearly 80% of eligible voters chose to vote in the most recent Artesianan election.

So as per the survey, almost everyone felt that it is a waste of time to vote (i.e. it is better to not vote) but still 80% people voted.

What can help resolve the paradox? If the people in the survey were almost all from the 20% set of people who did not vote then the paradox is resolved. The survey gave the opinion of a certain set of people and that set believed that it is a waste of time to vote. But it did not reflect the opinion of everyone. Normally, we expect a sample to give us information about the entire population but for that, the sample should be unbiased. Basically we are saying that there was a selection bias in the survey and that does explain the observations. It all makes sense then.

B) Only eligible voters who did not choose to vote in the most recent election were included in the recent survey.

That is why option (B) works.
rickyric395 - we don't have to ASSUME that the people who did not participate in the survey did not agree that voting is a waste of time. We KNOW that they did not think that voting is a waste of time. That is why they went and voted.
Option (B) tells us how we could have observed what we did - that in the survey most people said that voting is a waste of time but still 80% people voted. Because the survey participants all belonged to the 20% group.


E) Those voters who took part in the recent survey acted in accordance with their beliefs by refusing to waste time voting in the recent elections.

The statement should say "eligible voters," not voters because these people did not vote - we are told. But it doesn't change the fact that this option does not explain the paradox. It only supports the paradoxical situation.
The eligible voters who took part in the survey acted according to their beliefs. So this tells us that these people did not go to vote. Now we are still wondering that how come 80% people voted then? If people acted according to their beliefs and if it seems that most people felt that voting is a waste of time, then from where did these 80% voters come?

Answer (B)
­
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 31 Oct 2024
Posts: 15,420
Own Kudos:
69,198
 [1]
Given Kudos: 446
Location: Pune, India
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 15,420
Kudos: 69,198
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sayan640
KarishmaB , Can you please share your thought on option A ?
KarishmaB
Dhruv0911
Virtually all eligible voters who took part in a recent survey of political attitudes in Artesiana stated that because political candidates from the major parties are incompetent or corrupt (or both), it is a complete waste of time to vote in Artesianan elections. Yet nearly 80% of eligible voters chose to vote in the most recent Artesianan election.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the seeming paradox?

A) Eligible voters who chose to vote in the most recent election were compelled to vote for at least one candidate they knew to be incompetent or corrupt (or both).

B) Only eligible voters who did not choose to vote in the most recent election were included in the recent survey.

C) All eligible voters who took part in the recent survey gave truthful answers that accurately reflect their views concerning politics.

D) Candidates from some major political parties are competent but corrupt, whereas candidates from other parties are incompetent but honest.

E) Those voters who took part in the recent survey acted in accordance with their beliefs by refusing to waste time voting in the recent elections.
Observations:
A survey was conducted.
Virtually all eligible voters who took part in the survey said that candidates are incompetent or corrupt (or both), so it is a waste of time to vote.
Yet nearly 80% of eligible voters chose to vote in the most recent Artesianan election.

So as per the survey, almost everyone felt that it is a waste of time to vote (i.e. it is better to not vote) but still 80% people voted.

What can help resolve the paradox? If the people in the survey were almost all from the 20% set of people who did not vote then the paradox is resolved. The survey gave the opinion of a certain set of people and that set believed that it is a waste of time to vote. But it did not reflect the opinion of everyone. Normally, we expect a sample to give us information about the entire population but for that, the sample should be unbiased. Basically we are saying that there was a selection bias in the survey and that does explain the observations. It all makes sense then.

B) Only eligible voters who did not choose to vote in the most recent election were included in the recent survey.

That is why option (B) works.
rickyric395 - we don't have to ASSUME that the people who did not participate in the survey did not agree that voting is a waste of time. We KNOW that they did not think that voting is a waste of time. That is why they went and voted.
Option (B) tells us how we could have observed what we did - that in the survey most people said that voting is a waste of time but still 80% people voted. Because the survey participants all belonged to the 20% group.


E) Those voters who took part in the recent survey acted in accordance with their beliefs by refusing to waste time voting in the recent elections.

The statement should say "eligible voters," not voters because these people did not vote - we are told. But it doesn't change the fact that this option does not explain the paradox. It only supports the paradoxical situation.
The eligible voters who took part in the survey acted according to their beliefs. So this tells us that these people did not go to vote. Now we are still wondering that how come 80% people voted then? If people acted according to their beliefs and if it seems that most people felt that voting is a waste of time, then from where did these 80% voters come?

Answer (B)
­
­
In option (A), "compelled" does not mean that someone forced them to vote. We are given that they "chose" to vote. It means that the ones who chose to vote had no option but to vote for one of the incompetent or corrupt candidates (because all were like that).
Does it explain why 80% people took out the time to vote? No. 

But if we find out that the rest 20% people who thought that it was a waste of time to vote were the ones participating in the survey, then the survey result and the election tourout makes sense. These 80% did not think that it is a waste of time to vote and they did not participate in the survey either. 
User avatar
amanar11
Joined: 24 May 2024
Last visit: 28 Jun 2024
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 2
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rickyric395
KarishmaB, GMATNinja, AndrewN
OA is B, but B should be eliminated as it needs further assumption that those eligible voters who did not took part in survey did not agree with those who took part. Then only they could have took part in election.
Whereas A says Whereas A says that even though candidates are corrupt but people had to vote atleast 1 candidate
­If they were compelled to vote, then the turnout most be 100% right? Why would 80% vote after compulsion
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 31 Oct 2024
Posts: 15,420
Own Kudos:
69,198
 [1]
Given Kudos: 446
Location: Pune, India
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 15,420
Kudos: 69,198
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
amanar11
rickyric395
KarishmaB, GMATNinja, AndrewN
OA is B, but B should be eliminated as it needs further assumption that those eligible voters who did not took part in survey did not agree with those who took part. Then only they could have took part in election.
Whereas A says Whereas A says that even though candidates are corrupt but people had to vote atleast 1 candidate
­If they were compelled to vote, then the turnout most be 100% right? Why would 80% vote after compulsion
­I have explained this in the comment right above yours. 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7108 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts