Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
In the MBA world interviews of Stanford GSB and Kellogg business schools have a distinct place. In EP7 of MBA Interview series, we will have Rachel Erickson and Julia Brady talking about common MBA Interview question types
In each webinar, we teach game-changing techniques and strategies for solving some of the most high-value GMAT quant questions. In addition, we will provide you with the opportunity to ask questions regarding how to best prepare for the GMAT.
Getting 700+ on the GMAT needs a different skill set than the one you have used to reach high 600s. In this session, Chris Gentry (at Manhattan Prep) will teach 3 executive reasoning skills that you would need to break the 700 score barrier.
What Wharton admissions trying to assess in Team-based discussion? In the EP8 of MBA Interview series, Doris Huang (Wharton #MBA and Sr. Admission Consultant at Admissionado) will talk about the structure of TBD, what adcom committee expects, and more.
Attend this webinar to learn 3 key strategies – Stem Analysis, Scope Analysis and Framework Analysis to solve 700 level CR questions with ease. Learn to maximize your accuracy on CR and ace the GMAT Verbal Section!
Reading Comprehension has been added to the Target Test Prep Verbal course. With our full Verbal course, including 1,000+ practice verbal questions and 400+ instructor-led videos, you now have access to everything you need to master GMAT Verbal.
Why e-GMATers are 10x more likely to score 700+ on the GMAT? Attend the webinar to learn the 3-stage strategy that would help you achieve your target score.
Most people focus on practicing more questions and taking mocks to improve their Verbal score, but often their score plateaus around V30-35. Learn how you can overcome the score plateau and score V40+ strategically by targeting the core problem.
Re: Reiko drove from point A to point B at a constant speed, and
[#permalink]
30 Jul 2013, 07:32
I realize that I don't need algebra if I understand the concept (I wish all GMAT problems were like that! ) but I feel like knowing the algebra plus the underlying concepts strengthens my understanding of the material as a whole. Thanks for the response!
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
WholeLottaLove wrote:
Reiko drove from point A to point B at a constant speed, and then returned to A along the same route at a different constant speed. Did Reiko travel from A to B at a speed greater than 40 miles per hour?
(1) Reiko's average speed for the entire round trip, excluding the time spent at point B, was 80 miles per hour. Here is the way I understand it. Please correct me if I am wrong!!
Reiko drives the same distance each way. The average of two speeds is only valid if the two speeds are traveled for the same time. We're not talking about time here we are talking about distance. Lets say he drives one speed from A to B and a much faster speed from B to A. He may have moved faster but because he covered the same distance at a higher speed he did so in less time throwing the average off. When looking at equal distances, the average speed of half of the distance (either from A to B or from B to A) cannot be less than one half of the total average speed (i.e. 80 MPH.) In other words, he must have traveled at least 40MPH for both legs of the trip. SUFFICIENT
I am still having difficultly understanding the algebra for this problem. Could someone explain it to me?
Thanks!
The algebra is only used to explain you the concept. If you understand the concept, you don't need the algebra.
Say, d is the distance from A to B. So Reiko travels 2d (from A to B and then from B to A). His total average speed is 80 mph.
Time taken by Reiko for the entire trip = 2d/80 = d/40
Note that d is the distance of one side of the trip. If the speed of one side is only 40 mph, time taken to go from A to B will be d/40 i.e. the time allotted for the entire trip will get used for one side drive itself (A to B). There will be no time left to go back to A. Hence Reiko's speed for one leg of the journey must be greater than 40.
Re: Reiko drove from point A to point B at a constant speed, and
[#permalink]
15 Dec 2013, 23:13
how about this, dist a-to-b-to-a=240 miles 120 miles each a-to-b and b-to-a, given a) avg speed = 80 mph => 3 hrs to complete the entire trip (so 1.5 hrs each side a-to-b and b-to-a considering 1.5 hrs only to get avgerage to 1.5 as avg speed given is 80 mph). now if we consider speed as 41 mph(least possible integer value), reiko will need almost 3(175.61 min to be precise) hrs to complete(task was 3 hrs for to and fro trip) a-to-b thus speed has to be > 40 mph b) NS.
Re: Reiko drove from point A to point B at a constant speed, and
[#permalink]
31 Dec 2013, 04:31
deepakrobi wrote:
Reiko drove from point A to point B at a constant speed, and then returned to A along the same route at a different constant speed. Did Reiko travel from A to B at a speed greater than 40 miles per hour?
(1) Reiko's average speed for the entire round trip, excluding the time spent at point B, was 80 miles per hour.
(2) It took Reiko 20 more minutes to drive from A to B than to make the return trip.
OK, here's the deal
Let's say that each leg was 120 miles
So the question is asking if he took less than 3 hours on his way to B (120/40<3?)
Statement 1
240/8- = 3
So if Reiko took 3 hours on the whole trip then he must have taken less than 3 hours on the way to B
Therefore, this statement is sufficient
Statement 2
We really don't get much out of here, we need more information
So we get \(\frac{1}{S_1}+\frac{1}{S_2}= \frac{1}{40}\) and of course \(\frac{1}{S_1}< \frac{1}{40}\) So s1>40
EvaJager wrote:
deepakrobi wrote:
Can somebody please explain the answer? i am having hard time solving it. Reiko drove from point A to point B at a constant speed, and then returned to A along the same route at a different constant speed. Did Reiko travel from A to B at a speed greater than 40 miles per hour?
(1) Reiko's average speed for the entire round trip, excluding the time spent at point B, was 80 miles per hour.
(2) It took Reiko 20 more minutes to drive from A to B than to make the return trip.
Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
Both statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER one ALONE is sufficient.
EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.
Denote by \(D\) the distance between A and B, and by \(S_1\) and \(S_2\) the speeds when traveling from A to B and from B to A, respectively.
(1) The average speed is the total distance divided by the total time, which in our case, translates into the following equation:
\(\frac{2D}{\frac{D}{S_1}+\frac{D}{S_2}}=80\) or \(\, \, \, \, \frac{S_{1}S_{2}}{S_{1}+S_{2}}=40\)
Since \(\frac{S_{2}}{S_{1}+S_{2}}<1,\) it follows that \(40=\frac{S_{1}S_{2}}{S_{1}+S_{2}}<S_1.\)
Sufficient.
(2) Obviously not sufficient.
Answer A
It seems maybe counter-intuitive, but if you want to travel a given distance at a certain average speed, you cannot travel half of the distance at an average speed not greater than half of that final average speed. Doesn't matter if you travel with the speed of light the other half of the distance, you will not be able to make up for the slow other half. The algebra above proves it.
Does anyone have an intuitive explanation for this?[/quote]
Reiko drove from point A to point B at a constant speed, and
[#permalink]
13 Nov 2015, 06:34
I have been struggling through the concept, really. Here is my simplified solution for ST1 for the guys that are as math gifted as me. I tried to go away from too many formulas and terms that were exploitted too heavily in the solutions above in the thread and created even more abstraction. So you know the general formula, right:
Average speed =\(\frac{Total Distance}{Total time}\)
(a) Therefore 80 = \(\frac{D+D}{Total time}\) which is simplified to 40 = \(\frac{D}{Total time}\). From this we pull out Total time = \(\frac{D}{40}\)
(b) And now is simple reasoning: Total time should be greater than the time spent on the first half of the route (A to B), right? (Unless Reiko teleported in no time from B back to A). Hence ("Speed 1" stands for the searched speed from A to B)
\(\frac{D}{40}\)>\(\frac{D}{Speed 1}\) -
so when does this inequality hold true? Right, when the denominator in the second fraction is larger than the one in the first. From this we derive that Speed 1 > 40
Re: Reiko drove from point A to point B at a constant speed, and
[#permalink]
18 Nov 2015, 00:49
EvaJager wrote:
EvaJager wrote:
deepakrobi wrote:
Can somebody please explain the answer? i am having hard time solving it. Reiko drove from point A to point B at a constant speed, and then returned to A along the same route at a different constant speed. Did Reiko travel from A to B at a speed greater than 40 miles per hour?
(1) Reiko's average speed for the entire round trip, excluding the time spent at point B, was 80 miles per hour.
(2) It took Reiko 20 more minutes to drive from A to B than to make the return trip.
Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
Both statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER one ALONE is sufficient.
EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.
Denote by \(D\) the distance between A and B, and by \(S_1\) and \(S_2\) the speeds when traveling from A to B and from B to A, respectively.
(1) The average speed is the total distance divided by the total time, which in our case, translates into the following equation:
\(\frac{2D}{\frac{D}{S_1}+\frac{D}{S_2}}=80\) or \(\, \, \, \, \frac{S_{1}S_{2}}{S_{1}+S_{2}}=40\)
Since \(\frac{S_{2}}{S_{1}+S_{2}}<1,\) it follows that \(40=\frac{S_{1}S_{2}}{S_{1}+S_{2}}<S_1.\)
Sufficient.
(2) Obviously not sufficient.
Answer A
It seems maybe counter-intuitive, but if you want to travel a given distance at a certain average speed, you cannot travel half of the distance at an average speed not greater than half of that final average speed. Doesn't matter if you travel with the speed of light the other half of the distance, you will not be able to make up for the slow other half. The algebra above proves it.
Does anyone have an intuitive explanation for this?
EvaJager : I did get (S1*S2)/(S1+S2)=40. I am unable to entirely digest other explanations but may have understood what you have mentioned. Not sure if I have, so writing it here to get your comments and to also ask you another query.
First query: S1/(S1 + S2) should be lesser than 1 because the numerator S1 is lesser than the denominator S1+S2 (Because both S1 and S2 have to be positive). Thus, S1*(a quantity less than 1) = 40. This means S1 has to be greater than 40. This way, S2 should ALSO be greater than 40 right?
Second query: Another doubt I have which may sounds silly but is bugging me a bit after reading other users' explanations that say that even though the average of both speeds is 80 mph, neither of the speeds can be lesser than 40mph. Why is that? Can one of the speeds not be 130mph and the other 30 mph (both averaging 80 mph), where the latter is less than 40 mph ?
Whoever replies, I would highly appreciate your detailed response.
Reiko drove from point A to point B at a constant speed, and
[#permalink]
18 Dec 2015, 09:38
deepakrobi wrote:
Reiko drove from point A to point B at a constant speed, and then returned to A along the same route at a different constant speed. Did Reiko travel from A to B at a speed greater than 40 miles per hour?
(1) Reiko's average speed for the entire round trip, excluding the time spent at point B, was 80 miles per hour.
(2) It took Reiko 20 more minutes to drive from A to B than to make the return trip.
Couldn't solve this one due to time limit during the MGMAT CAT. It's just too tough to present this one as a DS question....
We can pick any value for distance: let's say 80 km one way -> 160 km whole trip Total Distance = 160 Average Speed = 80 \(Total Time = \frac{Total Distance}{Average Speed} = 2 Hours\) = Time 1 (from A to B) + Time 2 (from B to A) --> So Time 1 must be < 2 Hours (Total time)
Re: Reiko drove from point A to point B at a constant speed, and
[#permalink]
18 Dec 2015, 20:16
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
nishantsharma87 wrote:
EvaJager : I did get (S1*S2)/(S1+S2)=40. I am unable to entirely digest other explanations but may have understood what you have mentioned. Not sure if I have, so writing it here to get your comments and to also ask you another query.
First query: S1/(S1 + S2) should be lesser than 1 because the numerator S1 is lesser than the denominator S1+S2 (Because both S1 and S2 have to be positive). Thus, S1*(a quantity less than 1) = 40. This means S1 has to be greater than 40. This way, S2 should ALSO be greater than 40 right?
Second query: Another doubt I have which may sounds silly but is bugging me a bit after reading other users' explanations that say that even though the average of both speeds is 80 mph, neither of the speeds can be lesser than 40mph. Why is that? Can one of the speeds not be 130mph and the other 30 mph (both averaging 80 mph), where the latter is less than 40 mph ?
Whoever replies, I would highly appreciate your detailed response.
In short, this should help you: If I want my speed to be 100 mph over the entire return journey of 100 miles each side, I should take a total of 2 hours - 1 hour for each side. What if in the first leg of the journey itself, I take more than 2 hours (drive at a speed of less than 50 mph)? Can any speed I pick on the return leg make up for the lost time? Can my average speed every be 100 mph now? _________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >
Reiko drove from point A to point B at a constant speed, and
[#permalink]
26 Dec 2016, 07:14
EvaJager wrote:
Denote by \(D\) the distance between A and B, and by \(S_1\) and \(S_2\) the speeds when traveling from A to B and from B to A, respectively.
(1) The average speed is the total distance divided by the total time, which in our case, translates into the following equation:
\(\frac{2D}{\frac{D}{S_1}+\frac{D}{S_2}}=80\) or \(\, \, \, \, \frac{S_{1}S_{2}}{S_{1}+S_{2}}=40\)
Since \(\frac{S_{2}}{S_{1}+S_{2}}<1,\) it follows that \(40=\frac{S_{1}S_{2}}{S_{1}+S_{2}}<S_1.\)
Sufficient.
(2) Obviously not sufficient.
Answer A
Great explanation but I think the part that is not so intuitive is the following:
Since \(\frac{S_{2}}{S_{1}+S_{2}}<1,\) it follows that \(40=\frac{S_{1}S_{2}}{S_{1}+S_{2}}<S_1.\)
As you dont explain why <1 ..... Fair enough for some people the relationship between PART TO WHOLE has to be <1 but some ppl they cannot see this clearly. Also the \(40=\frac{S_{1}S_{2}}{S_{1}+S_{2}}<S_1.\) is quite convoluted. So if you can please elaborate your solution.
In any case I think that since we end up with the following equation \(40=\frac{S_{1}S_{2}}{S_{1}+S_{2}}\) we can rearrange such that \(S_11=\frac{40S_{2}}{S_{2}-40}\)
IS quite obvious that:
1) S2 CANNOT BE 0 otherwise it would never made the second leg and also forces S1 to be zero which doesn't make sense 2) S2 CANNOT BE smaller than 40 because then we have NEGATIVE S1 and strictly speaking speed is a positive quantity 3) S2 CANNOT BE 40 otherwise S_1 is not defined because of the 0 in the denominator of the fraction ( 40S_2 / 0 is not allowed )
Reiko drove from point A to point B at a constant speed, and
[#permalink]
16 Feb 2018, 01:18
1
Kudos
deepakrobi wrote:
Reiko drove from point A to point B at a constant speed, and then returned to A along the same route at a different constant speed. Did Reiko travel from A to B at a speed greater than 40 miles per hour?
(1) Reiko's average speed for the entire round trip, excluding the time spent at point B, was 80 miles per hour.
(2) It took Reiko 20 more minutes to drive from A to B than to make the return trip.
Got wrong as couldn't drill down to the core. However, now I solved like this.
Stmt 1: Let speed from A to B is 'a' and speed from B to A is 'b' Avg speed for the entire journey is 2ab/(a+b) = 80 => ab/(a+b) = 40 => ab = 40a + 40b => a = 40a/b + 40. Since, a and b positive(Speed), 40a/b will be +ve. Thus, a > 40 => Sufficient.
Stmt 2: Don't know the time or speed. Hence, Not Sufficient.
Re: Reiko drove from point A to point B at a constant speed, and
[#permalink]
08 Aug 2018, 09:16
sanjoo wrote:
athirasateesh wrote:
sanjoo can u explain this for me
Hey..u can see bunuel and karishma explanation..its clear..
A is sufficient..1/less than 40>40..as u put any value in denominator less than than 1/40 u l c the rate will be more than 40..
so we get the ans from A..yes speed was more than 40 from A to B...
But why should A to B must be greater than 40 km/hr and not B to A ? we cannot deduce from option A that A to B avg speed was greater than 40 and B to A less than 40.
Re: Reiko drove from point A to point B at a constant speed, and
[#permalink]
28 Jul 2019, 01:00
[quote="Zinsch123"]Statement (1): Let's say, the distance between A and B is 80 miles. It doesn't matter, what distance we assume in statement 1.
The whole trip (160 miles) took 2 hours. If his speed from A to B was NOT greater than 40 miles per hour, he would have needed at least 2 hours just to get from A to B. But we are told that after 2 hours he had already finished the complete trip, so there is no time left to get from B to A. Thus, his speed from A to B must have been greater than 40 miles per hour. --> sufficient
Or, with a little more math: t_1 + t_2 = t Time must be positive, therefore: t_1 < t t_1 = distance / speed_1 = d / s_1 t = 2 * distance / speed = 2 * d / 80 = d / 40 d / s_1 < d / 40 s_1 > 40
hi! Can you please let me know how did you decipher of not having time left?
Reiko drove from point A to point B at a constant speed, and
[#permalink]
28 Jul 2020, 12:19
Expert Reply
Top Contributor
deepakrobi wrote:
Reiko drove from point A to point B at a constant speed, and then returned to A along the same route at a different constant speed. Did Reiko travel from A to B at a speed greater than 40 miles per hour?
(1) Reiko's average speed for the entire round trip, excluding the time spent at point B, was 80 miles per hour. (2) It took Reiko 20 more minutes to drive from A to B than to make the return trip.
Given: Reiko drove from point A to point B at a constant speed, and then returned to A along the same route at a different constant speed.
Target question:Did Reiko travel from A to B at a speed greater than 40 miles per hour? This is a good candidate for rephrasing the target question.
Let d = the DISTANCE from A to B Let t = the TIME to travel from A to B Let u = the TIME to travel from B to A
Speed = distance/time So, Reiko's speed from A to B = d/t
REPHRASED target question:Is d/t < 40?
Aside: the video below has tips on rephrasing the target question
Statement 1: Reiko's average speed for the entire round trip, excluding the time spent at point B, was 80 miles per hour. Average speed = (TOTAL distance traveled)/(TOTAL travel time) We know that the TOTAL distance traveled = d + d = 2d The TOTAL travel time = t + u
So, when we plug in the values to get: 2d/(t + u) = 80 Multiply both sides of the equation by (t + u) to get: 2d = 80t + 80u Divide both sides of the equation by 2 to get: d = 40t + 40u
Now take the REPHRASED target question, Is d/t < 40?, and replace d to get: Is (40t + 40u)/t < 40? Rewrite as: Is 40t/t + 40u/t < 40? Simplify: Is 40 + 40u/t < 40? Subtract 40 from both sides of the inequality: Is 40u/t < 0? Since u and t must be POSITIVE numbers, 40u/t is POSITIVE, which means the answer to the REPHRASED target question is NO! Since we can answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT
Statement 2: It took Reiko 20 more minutes to drive from A to B than to make the return trip. Clearly not sufficient
Re: Reiko drove from point A to point B at a constant speed, and
[#permalink]
28 Jul 2020, 12:36
Expert Reply
deepakrobi wrote:
Reiko drove from point A to point B at a constant speed, and then returned to A along the same route at a different constant speed. Did Reiko travel from A to B at a speed greater than 40 miles per hour?
(1) Reiko's average speed for the entire round trip, excluding the time spent at point B, was 80 miles per hour.
(2) It took Reiko 20 more minutes to drive from A to B than to make the return trip.
Did Reiko travel from A to B at a speed greater than 40 miles per hour?
Statement 1: Test whether it is possible that the speed from A to B = 40 mph. Let the distance from A to B = 80 miles, implying that the entire round trip = 160 miles. Since the average speed for the entire 160-mile round trip = 80 mph, the time for the entire trip = d/r = 160/80 = 2 hours. If the speed for the 80-mile trip from A to B = 40 mph, the time from A to B = d/r = 80/40 = 2 hours. Not possible. Since the total time for the entire round trip = 2 hours, the time from A to B must be LESS THAN 2 HOURS. Implication: For the time from A to B to DECREASE, the speed from A to B must INCREASE. Thus, the speed from A to B must be GREATER THAN 40 MPH. SUFFICIENT
Statement 2: Here, the speed from A to B can be any positive value. INSUFFICIENT
Re: Reiko drove from point A to point B at a constant speed, and
[#permalink]
29 Jul 2021, 05:39
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________
One of the fastest-growing graduate business schools in Southern California, shaping the future by developing leading thinkers who will stand at the forefront of business growth. MBA Landing | School of Business (ucr.edu)