Last visit was: 23 May 2024, 04:46 It is currently 23 May 2024, 04:46
Toolkit
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

# Researcher: Each subject in this experiment owns one car, and was

SORT BY:
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Director
Joined: 23 Apr 2019
Status:PhD trained. Education research, management.
Posts: 806
Own Kudos [?]: 1852 [8]
Given Kudos: 203
Intern
Joined: 26 May 2019
Posts: 8
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 100
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 14034
Own Kudos [?]: 34074 [3]
Given Kudos: 5806
GPA: 3.62
Intern
Joined: 26 May 2019
Posts: 8
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 100
Re: Researcher: Each subject in this experiment owns one car, and was [#permalink]
Current Student
Joined: 26 Feb 2020
Posts: 15
Own Kudos [?]: 41 [1]
Given Kudos: 66
Location: India
Schools: ISB '23 (A)
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38 (Online)
Re: Researcher: Each subject in this experiment owns one car, and was [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Hovkial wrote:
Researcher: Each subject in this experiment owns one car, and was asked to estimate what proportion of all automobiles registered in the nation are the same make as the subject’s car. The estimate of nearly every subject has been significantly higher than the actual national statistic for the make of that subject’s car. I hypothesize that certain makes of car are more common in some regions of the nation than in other regions; obviously, that would lead many people to overestimate how common their make of car is nationally. That is precisely the result found in this experiment, so certain makes of car must indeed be more common in some areas of the nation than in others.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses a reasoning flaw in the researcher’s argument?

(A) The argument fails to estimate the likelihood that most subjects in the experiment did not know the actual statistics about how common their make of car is nationwide.

(B) The argument treats a result that supports a hypothesis as a result that proves a hypothesis.

(C) The argument fails to take into account the possibility that the subject pool may come from a wide variety of geographical regions.

(D) The argument attempts to draw its main conclusion from a set of premises that are mutually contradictory.

(E) The argument applies a statistical generalization to a particular case to which it was not intended to apply.

CR Breakdown:
Each subject owns a car --> Estimated nationwide number of cars of the same model as their own ---> everyone estimated a higher (than actual) number
the author tries to explain the result with a hypothesize: more cars of same make ina particular region ---> hence subjects overestimated the nationwide number based on regional number
The author tries to base his main conclusion on this result .

(A) The author is not making any conclusion based on the actual numbers of results so this is useless. This could have been our answer if the author used absolute numbers to make his conclusion. But he has just used the overall result trend.

(B) Correct, the Author justified the result from his hypothesis first as an attempt to explain the result and then jumps to conclude the same hypothesis from the same result

(C) This actually supports our hypothesis, even though the subjects came from different geographical areas they still estimated higher numbers, so this proves that hypothesis must be true across all geographies

(D) There is no contradiction in the premise.

(E) The case and the statistical generalization are related to one another and there is no particular separate case here.

Hope this helps,
I tried to explain here because although I got the answer correct, I was not able to pinpoint why other choices were exactly wrong and this is my attempt to understand and dissect the question better.
CEO
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Posts: 2578
Own Kudos [?]: 1836 [0]
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Researcher: Each subject in this experiment owns one car, and was [#permalink]
Researcher: Each subject in this experiment owns one car, and was asked to estimate what proportion of all automobiles registered in the nation are the same make as the subject’s car. The estimate of nearly every subject has been significantly higher than the actual national statistic for the make of that subject’s car. I hypothesize that certain makes of car are more common in some regions of the nation than in other regions; obviously, that would lead many people to overestimate how common their make of car is nationally. That is precisely the result found in this experiment, so certain makes of car must indeed be more common in some areas of the nation than in others.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses a reasoning flaw in the researcher’s argument?

(A) The argument fails to estimate the likelihood that most subjects in the experiment did not know the actual statistics about how common their make of car is nationwide. - WRONG. Subjects knowing about the statistics or not is irrelevant. In fact, had they known the conclusion would have been strengthened by this choice.

(B) The argument treats a result that supports a hypothesis as a result that proves a hypothesis. - CORRECT. The passage just assumes something and concludes the assumption it self. It goes round and round.

(C) The argument fails to take into account the possibility that the subject pool may come from a wide variety of geographical regions. - WRONG. It must be like that but does it impact the conclusion. No.

(D) The argument attempts to draw its main conclusion from a set of premises that are mutually contradictory. - WRONG. The logic applied is not contradictory instead it support each other - evidence/basis and conclusion.

(E) The argument applies a statistical generalization to a particular case to which it was not intended to apply. - WRONG. Nowhere such a generalisation is identifiable.

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17359
Own Kudos [?]: 852 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Re: Researcher: Each subject in this experiment owns one car, and was [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Researcher: Each subject in this experiment owns one car, and was [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6936 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts