Doer01
mykrasovski
Why is C incorrect? If we negate it and say that "Neanderthals from different areas had similar languages that allowed to cooperate", then the argument, which includes the premise the monkeys treated other monkeys as enemies, is broken. So, C is a good answer.
Hi
mykrasovski I am not here to point out why C is wrong because that already been done. I am here to point out a flaw in your negation technique. Negating an assumption is absolutely necessary but it must be done correctly. Refer to CR bible to see the difference between opposite and logical opposite. We must only find a logical opposite to negate a sentence.
Logical opposite of C would be “Neanderthals from different areas did NOT use different languages....”.
Posted from my mobile deviceHi
doer, thanks for your reply. Okay, let's apply negation to answer choice B - "Tools and artifacts could
not go far away", so it Strengthens the argument itself (see last sentence). Usually, the negation technique Weakens the argument... So, I don't understand how the Negation Technique works here... Perhaps, I should have negated the "only if" piece of the sentence and say "
not only if"? Then the negated choice B means that the items could go far away from sites for other reasons than trade, while the argument says "in most of the Neanderthal sites ... tools have been found pretty near the source". The negation technique hurts / weakens the argument in this case. Am I correct?
Luckily, I do have the PS CR Bible book. However, I was not keen on following this book because some of the approaches it teaches differ from those in Manhattan CR book. For instance, Manhattan suggests to read & identify the question before reading the paragraph (stimulus), while the CR Bible says just the opposite. Also, Manhattan does a better job at classifying the question types (in my subjective view). Nonetheless, CR Bible is a highly respected book and I am wondering what your opinion about these two sources are. I am definitely struggling with CR and looking forward to find a source that will help me improve. Perhaps, I could "blend" the two books and supplement Manhattan foundation with more detail from CR Bible?
Thank you in advance!