Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 17:01 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 17:01

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Nov 2015
Posts: 18
Own Kudos [?]: 19 [8]
Given Kudos: 109
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 27 Jun 2014
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Current Student
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1436
Own Kudos [?]: 4548 [0]
Given Kudos: 1228
Location: India
Send PM
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Nov 2015
Posts: 18
Own Kudos [?]: 19 [0]
Given Kudos: 109
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
Send PM
Re: In a chess tournament, each player in the tournament plays every other [#permalink]
Hi archiemuty &Vyshak

I have one question here. For such kind of problem, do we have another way to resolve other than testing possibilities? I mean, in case of the given data, testing possibilities could be a quick approach, but in case that we were given larger data (e.g got 100 points and participated in 70 matches..), this approach could be quite time-consuming and may incur inaccuracy, right?

Thanks for help :)
Current Student
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1436
Own Kudos [?]: 4548 [1]
Given Kudos: 1228
Location: India
Send PM
Re: In a chess tournament, each player in the tournament plays every other [#permalink]
1
Kudos
thuyduong91vnu wrote:
Hi archiemuty &Vyshak

I have one question here. For such kind of problem, do we have another way to resolve other than testing possibilities? I mean, in case of the given data, testing possibilities could be a quick approach, but in case that we were given larger data (e.g got 100 points and participated in 70 matches..), this approach could be quite time-consuming and may incur inaccuracy, right?

Thanks for help :)


Hi,

There are 3 unknowns. The 3 unknowns can take multiple values. Answer can be found only by substituting the given values.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Oct 2017
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: In a chess tournament, each player in the tournament plays every other [#permalink]
Hello,
My issue with this problem is that it mentions: "Player X has 4 points after 6 matches", which implies that 6 matches have actually been played, however the only way to get to the correct answer is to assume that the player has skipped one of the games. Isn't it illogical to count a game that hasn't been played? I didn't get to the correct answer because I assumed that we shouldn't count the games that the player chooses to sit out.
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13961
Own Kudos [?]: 32917 [1]
Given Kudos: 5778
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: In a chess tournament, each player in the tournament plays every other [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Official Explanation

Rather than consider all of the possible combinations of wins, losses, and draws that might result in this outcome, use the answer choices. Since winning is the only way to receive positive points, start there.

(A) Because Player X has 4 points, she must have won at least two matches; eliminate A for the first column.

(B) If Player X wins 2 games, she will have 4 points. In order to stay at 4 points, she must draw all 4 of the remaining matches and lose no matches. There is no option for 0 losses so this cannot be the correct answer.

(C) If Player X wins 3 games, she will have 6 points. In order to return to 4 points, she must lose 2 of the remaining 3 games and draw on 1 game. This combination is possible in the answer choices: win 3 and lose 2.

You don’t need to check the remaining answers because you have found a pair that works. Just to check the logic: the player can’t have won 4 or 5 matches because she will earn too many points. If she wins 4 matches, she’ll earn 8 points. If she loses the other 2 matches, she’ll drop only 2 points to 6, but the problem requires her score to finish at 4. If she wins 5 matches, her final score will be even higher.

Column 1: The correct answer is (C).
Column 2: The correct answer is (B).
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 32679
Own Kudos [?]: 822 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: In a chess tournament, each player in the tournament plays every other [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In a chess tournament, each player in the tournament plays every other [#permalink]
Moderators:
Math Expert
92915 posts
DI Forum Moderator
1031 posts
RC & DI Moderator
11178 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne