GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 18 Oct 2019, 21:29

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

A view fast gaining popularity is that international

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 26 Mar 2019
Posts: 100
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Re: A view fast gaining popularity is that international  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2019, 09:32
1
Quote:
A view fast gaining popularity is that international coaches emphasizing on technique and relying on a strict training regimen are overdoing their job. After all, at the highest level, the professional sportsmen lack neither the skill nor the expertise to perform; therefore, the role of a coach must be more of a people manager and a facilitator. A crucial aspect such proponents miss is that no sportsperson, however skilled, is flawless in technique and letting such lacuna aggravate is bound to have serious repercussions; furthermore, given the highly dynamic and competitive nature of the modern day sport, lack of technical advancements may outmode tomorrow, a competitive sportsperson today. Clearly, those arguing for softer coaching at the highest level must rethink.

In the argument above, the portions in boldface play which of the following roles?


This is Critical Reasoning (CR) question, where we have two boldfaced sentences and we need to identify their roles in the passage. Let us have a closer look at the options and find out which one is more relevant:
A. The first is the main conclusion of the passage; the second opposes that conclusion. - The first sentence is not the main conclusion, it is the conclusion of people, who have a view fast gaining popularity. Their conclusion is later challenged by the author, and he brings an opposing conclusion. The second sentence opposes the first sentence, but as mentioned earlier, first sentence is not a conclusion. Incorrect
B. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument. - This option correctly states that the first boldface sentence is a conclusion that the argument opposes. Also, it is correct that the second one is here to support the main conclusion provided by the author in the end of the passage. Correct
C. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is the main conclusion of the argument. - Even though the first boldface play is determined correctly, the second sentence is not the main conclusion. Its main purpose is to undermine the previous conclusion, and the main conclusion of the passage is that "those arguing for softer coaching at the highest level must rethink" - Incorrect
D. The first is a consideration that has been used to oppose the main conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence presented to support the main conclusion of the argument. - When first option was presented, there was no opposing idea in the passage, and only after the first conclusion, the opposing argument appeared in the passage. The second sentence is not an evidence, it sounds more like a suggestion, that if the sportsman does not keep up his technical abilities, tomorrow he can be out of competition. Incorrect
E. The first has been used to support the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument. - The main conclusion actually opposes the first sentence. The second sentence is identified correctly. Incorrect
Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 15 Jun 2019
Posts: 205
A view fast gaining popularity is that international  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 16 Jul 2019, 09:47
1
A view fast gaining popularity is that international coaches emphasizing on technique and relying on a strict training regimen are overdoing their job. After all, at the highest level, the professional sportsmen lack neither the skill nor the expertise to perform; therefore, the role of a coach must be more of a people manager and a facilitator. A crucial aspect such proponents miss is that no sportsperson, however skilled, is flawless in technique and letting such lacuna aggravate is bound to have serious repercussions; furthermore, given the highly dynamic and competitive nature of the modern day sport, lack of technical advancements may outmode tomorrow, a competitive sportsperson today. Clearly, those arguing for softer coaching at the highest level must rethink.

Type: Boldface
if we break it down : ___ -> BF1 is a conclusion , and author opposes it subsequently and in BF2 , author gives a premise for the main conclusion.

A. The first is the main conclusion of the passage; the second opposes that conclusion
BF1 is not main conclusion, hence wrong

B. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.
BINGO, this states our finding . HENCE CORRECT
C. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
As the BF2 is not the main conclusion, this is wrong

D. The first is a consideration that has been used to oppose the main conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.
first is not a consideration, this is wrong

E. The first has been used to support the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument
First is not used to support main conclusion,. this also wrong

Hence the Ans is B
_________________
please do correct my mistakes that itself a big kudo for me,

thanks

Originally posted by ccheryn on 16 Jul 2019, 09:46.
Last edited by ccheryn on 16 Jul 2019, 09:47, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 08 Jan 2018
Posts: 98
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: A view fast gaining popularity is that international  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2019, 09:47
1
A. The first is the main conclusion of the passage; the second oppose that conclusion. First is not the main conclusion, as the last line gives a clear picture of the main conclusion.
B. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument. This looks promising. First is a kind of conclusion, that gives a contradicatory view of the arguement. Second proposes an opinion, which supports the main conclusion.
C. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is the main conclusion of the argument. Second one is an opinion, not the main conclusion.
D. The first is a consideration that has been used to oppose the main conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.IMO first is not a consideration, it`s kind of conclusion for the above-stated lines. But again it looks closer to the answer.
E. The first has been used to support the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument. First one is not supporting the main conclusion, it`s contradicting the main conclusion.

IMO the answer is B.

Please hit kudos if you like the solution.
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 18 Feb 2017
Posts: 93
A view fast gaining popularity is that international  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2019, 09:47
1
IMO B.

Premise: Argument is against people who think softer coaching is needed now than a strict training regimen.
Conclusion: Author condemns this attitude and thinks that no sportsmen is flawless and hence, coaches should continue with a training regimen.
Bold portion 1: "the role of a coach must be more of a people manager and a facilitator" --> conclusion is against this. The whole passage is against this.
Bold portion 2:" technical advancements may outmode tomorrow, a competitive sportsperson today. " --> reasoning or a supporting claim for the argument.

A. The first is the main conclusion of the passage; the second opposes that conclusion. [First is not the main conclusion of the passage.]
B. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument. [Bang on.]
C. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is the main conclusion of the argument. [First is not the main conclusion of the passage.]
D. The first is a consideration that has been used to oppose the main conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence presented to support the main conclusion of the argument. [First bold portion is what the author is against and hence is not just a consideration.]
E. The first has been used to support the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument. [First is not used to support the main conclusion of the argument.]
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
V
Joined: 25 Sep 2018
Posts: 426
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 640 Q47 V30
GPA: 3.97
WE: Investment Banking (Investment Banking)
CAT Tests
Re: A view fast gaining popularity is that international  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2019, 10:02
1
A view fast gaining popularity is that international coaches emphasizing on technique and relying on a strict training regimen are overdoing their job. After all, at the highest level, the professional sportsmen lack neither the skill nor the expertise to perform; therefore, the role of a coach must be more of a people manager and a facilitator. A crucial aspect such proponents miss is that no sportsperson, however skilled, is flawless in technique and letting such lacuna aggravate is bound to have serious repercussions; furthermore, given the highly dynamic and competitive nature of the modern day sport, lack of technical advancements may outmode tomorrow, a competitive sportsperson today. Clearly, those arguing for softer coaching at the highest level must rethink.

In the argument above, the portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
Conclusion of the argument : People arguing for softer coaching at the highest level must rethink

A. The first is the main conclusion of the passage; the second opposes that conclusion.- Incorrect. First is not the main conclusion of the argument, it is a claim drawn from a viewpoint.
B. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.- Correct. First is the conclusion drawn by people who have the popular view point on international coaches which the argument further seeks to go against. Second is a belief/ consideration presented to support the main conclusion as stated
C. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.- Incorrect. Argument surely seeks to oppose the first, However, 2nd isn't the main conclusion of the argument, it's just a belief/ consideration.
D. The first is a consideration that has been used to oppose the main conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.- Incorrect.First is not used to oppose the main conclusion of the argument. also, 2nd isn't an evidence but rather a belief/consideration to support the main conclusion
E. The first has been used to support the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.- [color=#ed1c24]Incorrect. first is not supporting the main conclusion of the argument in anyway. 2nd is true.

_________________
Why do we fall?...So we can learn to pick ourselves up again
Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 08 Jan 2018
Posts: 145
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
WE: Project Management (Manufacturing)
Re: A view fast gaining popularity is that international  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2019, 10:10
1
IMO-B

Premise- International coaches are overdoing their job (by emphasizing on technique and relying on a strict training regime)
Professional sportsmen not lack skill or expertise to perform
Intermediate Conclusion-The role of a coach must be more of a people manager and a facilitator.
Premise- No sportsperson is flawless in technique
Given the highly dynamic and competitive nature of the modern day sport, lack of technical advancements may outmode a competitive sportsperson tomorrow.
Main Conclusion-Those arguing for softer coaching at the highest level must rethink.


A. The first is the main conclusion of the passage; the second opposes that conclusion.---Incorrect-- First BF not main conclusion
B. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.--Correct--First BF intermediate conclusion that oppose main conclusion and Second BF consideration to support the main conclusion.
C. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.----Incorrect-- Second BF not main conclusion
D. The first is a consideration that has been used to oppose the main conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.---Incorrect-- Second BF not an evidence.It's just a consideration
E. The first has been used to support the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.---Incorrect-- First BF not Support main conclusion
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 13 Feb 2018
Posts: 450
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V28
Premium Member
Re: A view fast gaining popularity is that international  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2019, 10:14
1
I think the first is a conclusion, but not the author's, it's the conclusion of a proponent of "fast gaining popular opinion"
The argument as a whole tries to oppose the conclusion above and at the and the author gives his conclusion: "Clearly, those arguing for softer coaching at the highest level must rethink."
This is my reasoning let's see the answer options

A. The first is the main conclusion of the passage; the second opposes that conclusion.
The first is not the main conclusion per my reasoning above. Wrong

B. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.
Thats good, according to my reasoning, we can call the "second" a consideration

C. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
the second is not the conclusion

D. The first is a consideration that has been used to oppose the main conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.
The first is a conclusion, not main but anyway a conclusion
The second is not evidence, it is a prediction

E. The first has been used to support the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.
The first does not support the main conclusion. wrong

IMO
Ans: B
Director
Director
User avatar
V
Status: Manager
Joined: 27 Oct 2018
Posts: 678
Location: Egypt
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GPA: 3.67
WE: Pharmaceuticals (Health Care)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A view fast gaining popularity is that international  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2019, 10:17
1
By rephrasing the passage, it can be divided into:
A common belief or idea: "international coaches emphasizing on technique and relying on a strict training regimen are overdoing their job"
consideration/reason for the common belief: the professional sportsmen lack neither the skill nor the expertise
conclusion on the common belief: the role of a coach must be more of a people manager and a facilitator --> boldface 1
consideration/reason (1) against the common belief: no sportsperson is flawless in technique ...
consideration/reason (2) against the common belief: lack of technical advancements may outmode tomorrow, a competitive sportsperson today --> boldface 2
Author's main conclusion: those arguing for softer coaching at the highest level must rethink

from the above understanding,
the first boldface is not the main conclusion (A) or a support for it (E). Besides, it is not used to oppose the main conclusion (D), but the other way around is. In other words, it is opposed by the main conclusion of the author (B,C).
the second bold face is not opposing the main conclusion (A) and is not the main conclusion (C), but is a consideration (not an evidence D ) that supports the main conclusion (B,E)

Only B represented both boldfaces correctly
_________________
Thanks for Kudos
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Jan 2019
Posts: 125
Location: Peru
Premium Member
A view fast gaining popularity is that international  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 16 Jul 2019, 19:26
1
A view fast gaining popularity is that international coaches emphasizing on technique and relying on a strict training regimen are overdoing their job. After all, at the highest level, the professional sportsmen lack neither the skill nor the expertise to perform; therefore, the role of a coach must be more of a people manager and a facilitator. A crucial aspect such proponents miss is that no sportsperson, however skilled, is flawless in technique and letting such lacuna aggravate is bound to have serious repercussions; furthermore, given the highly dynamic and competitive nature of the modern day sport, lack of technical advancements may outmode tomorrow, a competitive sportsperson today. Clearly, those arguing for softer coaching at the highest level must rethink.

Counter Premise:

-The role of a coach must be more of a people manager

Premises:

-Flawless in technique and letting such lacuna aggravate is bound to have serious repercussions
-Given the highly dynamic and competitive nature of the modern day sport, lack of technical advancements may outmode tomorrow, a competitive sportsperson today.

Conclusion

-Those arguing for softer coaching at the highest level must rethink.

In the argument above, the portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is the main conclusion of the passage; the second opposes that conclusion.
B. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument. -This one is the only one that matches our previous analysis
C. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
D. The first is a consideration that has been used to oppose the main conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.
E. The first has been used to support the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.

(B) is our answer

Originally posted by Mizar18 on 16 Jul 2019, 10:51.
Last edited by Mizar18 on 16 Jul 2019, 19:26, edited 1 time in total.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 31 May 2018
Posts: 417
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Re: A view fast gaining popularity is that international  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2019, 11:13
1
the main conclusion of the argument----those arguing for softer coaching at the highest level must rethink.

BF1--the role of a coach must be more of a people manager and a facilitator
This boldface is the intermediate conclusion

BF2--lack of technical advancements may outmode tomorrow, a competitive sportsperson today
This is a consideration


A. The first is the main conclusion of the passage; the second opposes that conclusion.
BF1 is not the main conclusion of the argument-----(OUT)

B. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.

YES BF1--is the conclusion that argument seeks to oppose ,BF2--is consideration that supports the main conclusion of the argument (CORRECT)

C. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
BF2 is not the main conclusion of the argument---it is a consideration (OUT)

D. The first is a consideration that has been used to oppose the main conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.
BF1 is not the consideration it is an intermediate conclusion (OUT)

E. The first has been used to support the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.
BF1 doesn't support the main conclusion of the argument (OUT)
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 24 Jun 2017
Posts: 71
CAT Tests
Re: A view fast gaining popularity is that international  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2019, 11:15
1
A view fast gaining popularity is that international coaches emphasizing on technique and relying on a strict training regimen are overdoing their job. After all, at the highest level, the professional sportsmen lack neither the skill nor the expertise to perform; therefore, the role of a coach must be more of a people manager and a facilitator. —- conclusion intermediate- opposite to direction of argument —

A crucial aspect such proponents miss is that no sportsperson, however skilled, is flawless in technique and letting such lacuna aggravate is bound to have serious repercussions; furthermore, given the highly dynamic and competitive nature of the modern day sport, lack of technical advancements may outmode tomorrow, a competitive sportsperson today.
Fact that is in same direction as conclusion of argument ++++
Clearly, those arguing for softer coaching at the highest level must rethink.
Main conclusion ———————-

In the argument above, the portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is the main conclusion of the passage; — WRONG the second opposes that conclusion. INCORRECT
B. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; - True the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument. True CORRECT
C. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; TRUE the second is the main conclusion of the argument. FALSE - Incorrect
D. The first is a consideration that has been used to oppose the main conclusion of the argument; - first is not a consideration, yet we can consider this and analyze second part. the second is evidence presented to support the main conclusion of the argument. - second is not evidence
E. The first has been used to support the main conclusion of the argument; NO the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument. - INCORRECT

So, IMO B

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 21 Jan 2019
Posts: 100
Re: A view fast gaining popularity is that international  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2019, 11:17
1
A view fast gaining popularity is that international coaches emphasizing on technique and relying on a strict training regimen are overdoing their job. --> general perception
After all, at the highest level, the professional sportsmen lack neither the skill nor the expertise to perform; --> Premise supporting conclusion
therefore, the role of a coach must be more of a people manager and a facilitator. --> Conclusion based on the above belief
A crucial aspect such proponents miss is that no sportsperson, however skilled, is flawless in technique and letting such lacuna aggravate is bound to have serious repercussions;--> Premise supporting Main conclusion
furthermore, given the highly dynamic and competitive nature of the modern day sport, lack of technical advancements may outmode tomorrow, a competitive sportsperson today. --> premise supporting main conclusion
Clearly, those arguing for softer coaching at the highest level must rethink. --> main conclusion

POE:
A. The first is the main conclusion of the passage; the second opposes that conclusion. :BF1 is not the main conclusion. Incorrect
B. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.Correct as per above explanation
C. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is the main conclusion of the argument. BF 2 not the main conclusion of the argument
D. The first is a consideration that has been used to oppose the main conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence presented to support the main conclusion of the argument. This is a close option but BF1 is not a consideration.
E. The first has been used to support the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.BF1 is against the main conclusion[

Option b is the answer
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 10 Aug 2016
Posts: 68
Location: India
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A view fast gaining popularity is that international  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2019, 11:21
1
A view fast gaining popularity is that international coaches emphasizing on technique and relying on a strict training regimen are overdoing their job. After all, at the highest level, the professional sportsmen lack neither the skill nor the expertise to perform; therefore, the role of a coach must be more of a people manager and a facilitator. A crucial aspect such proponents miss is that no sportsperson, however skilled, is flawless in technique and letting such lacuna aggravate is bound to have serious repercussions; furthermore, given the highly dynamic and competitive nature of the modern day sport, lack of technical advancements may outmode tomorrow, a competitive sportsperson today. Clearly, those arguing for softer coaching at the highest level must rethink.

In the argument above, the portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
The first bold is followed by 'therefore', so its clearly a conclusion. This conclusion is for the view of fast gaining popularity and concludes that the role of the coach should be more of a people manager and facilitator to the sportsperson.

Last sentence of the passage is the main conclusion by the author which states that the people arguing for the softer coaching at highest level should rethink.
This main conclusion is opposite of the conclusion in first bold face.
Second bold face supports the main conclusion of the author.


A. The first is the main conclusion of the passage; the second opposes that conclusion. --> first is not the main conclusion of the passage. Incorrect.
B. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument. --> first one is a conclusion and the main conclusion opposes that. Second is in support of the main conclusion. Correct.
C. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is the main conclusion of the argument. --> Second is not the main conclusion but a statement supporting main conclusion.
D. The first is a consideration that has been used to oppose the main conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence presented to support the main conclusion of the argument. --> first is a conclusion not a consideration. Incorrect.
E. The first has been used to support the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument. --> first one opposes the main conclusion. Incorrect.

Answer Choice: B
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 22 Oct 2018
Posts: 73
Re: A view fast gaining popularity is that international  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2019, 11:21
1
A view fast gaining popularity is that international coaches emphasizing on technique and relying on a strict training regimen are overdoing their job. After all, at the highest level, the professional sportsmen lack neither the skill nor the expertise to perform; therefore, the role of a coach must be more of a people manager and a facilitator. A crucial aspect such proponents miss is that no sportsperson, however skilled, is flawless in technique and letting such lacuna aggravate is bound to have serious repercussions; furthermore, given the highly dynamic and competitive nature of the modern day sport, lack of technical advancements may outmode tomorrow, a competitive sportsperson today. Clearly, those arguing for softer coaching at the highest level must rethink.

In the argument above, the portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is the main conclusion of the passage; the second opposes that conclusion.
B. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.
C. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
D. The first is a consideration that has been used to oppose the main conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.
E. The first has been used to support the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.

Explanation:
The main conclusion of the passage is " clearly ,those arguing for softer......rethink."
The first statement is the viewpoint of the author which is finally being not accepted by the argument.
The second statement speaks in favour of the main conclusion .


A. The first is the main conclusion of the passage; the second opposes that conclusion..Incorrect.the first statement is not the main concluison but a view point of the author.Second is in complete favour of the conclusion as it hints out of necessity of being updates with the most skilled coaching to be competitive in the market.

B. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument . Correctt.As expalined above first is the conclusion which being finally opposed by the argument as if the role of the coach is very much restricted to being a manager or facilitator then they would be outmode in this technically advanced market..The second is the consideration for the conclusion to arrive.There has to be rigorous and technically advanced coaching at the highest level to compete in the market.

C. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.Incorrect.second is not the main conclusion.

D. The first is a consideration that has been used to oppose the main conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.Incorrect.First is the viewpoin of the author and not consideration to oppose the main conclusion.Second is not the evidence but the consideration on the basis of which the conclusion stands.

In
E. The first has been used to support the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.Incorrect.Though second is the consideration for the main conclusion but first is not supporting the main conclusion.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 18 Jun 2013
Posts: 134
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Reviews Badge
Re: A view fast gaining popularity is that international  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2019, 12:11
1
Intermediate Conclusion: The role of a coach must be more of a people manager and a facilitator.

Main Conclusion: Those arguing for softer coaching at the highest level must rethink.

All the other information given is either supporting the intermediate conclusion or the main conclusion as mentioned above. Let us check the options now.

A. The first is the main conclusion of the passage; the second opposes that conclusion. --> Wrong. The first is the intermediate conclusion and not the main conclusion.

B. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument. --> Correct. Here the first part is correctly identified as an intermediate conclusion and the second as additional data to support the main conclusion which follows in the argument.

C. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is the main conclusion of the argument. --> Wrong. The first part is correct but the second part is not the main conclusion. Rather it is additional information to support the main conclusion.

D. The first is a consideration that has been used to oppose the main conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence presented to support the main conclusion of the argument. --> Wrong. The second part is correct however the first part has been identified incorrectly here.

E. The first has been used to support the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument. --> Wrong. The first is wrong. It opposes and not supports the main conclusion of the argument. The second part is correct.
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 03 Aug 2009
Posts: 58
CAT Tests
Re: A view fast gaining popularity is that international  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2019, 12:45
1
A view fast gaining popularity is that international coaches emphasizing on technique and relying on a strict training regimen are overdoing their job. After all, at the highest level, the professional sportsmen lack neither the skill nor the expertise to perform; therefore, the role of a coach must be more of a people manager and a facilitator. A crucial aspect such proponents miss is that no sportsperson, however skilled, is flawless in technique and letting such lacuna aggravate is bound to have serious repercussions; furthermore, given the highly dynamic and competitive nature of the modern day sport, lack of technical advancements may outmode tomorrow, a competitive sportsperson today. Clearly, those arguing for softer coaching at the highest level must rethink.

In the argument above, the portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

Lets summarize:
Last sentence provides position of an author: popular view that a first of all a coach must be a people manager/facilitator should be reconsidered. And there is concrete reason for such reconsideration: letting such lacuna aggravate is bound to have serious repercussions; Moreover, lack of technical advancements may outmode tomorrow, a competitive sportsperson today.


A. The first is the main conclusion of the passage; the second opposes that conclusion. - as we saw, the main conclusion of the passage is that the view should be rethought, therefore out right away
B. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument. this is inline with our own brief summary: we seek to oppose the view by stating the consideration such as technique outdoing a sportman
C. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is the main conclusion of the argument. could be the answer, however, as stated, the second is not conclusion. Conclusion is that the view must be reconsidered
D. The first is a consideration that has been used to oppose the main conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence presented to support the main conclusion of the argument. so this option switches the consideration and the conclusion vice-verca. We are opposing the first boldface statement, but not the statment opposes the conclusion
E. The first has been used to support the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.
the main conclusion of the arguent calls to oppose the first boldface statement, therefore this option is out
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 148
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: A view fast gaining popularity is that international  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2019, 12:52
1
People believe: that coaches are overdoing their job by emphasizing on technique and relying on strict training. and that they should not do that, because, professional players already have skills and expertise to perform. so role of coach should be of only facilitating and people management.
Author: The above people are missing a certain aspect. However skilled these players are, no player is without flaw in technique. this will lead to higher negative impact. additionally, given the competitiveness of today's sport, and lack of technical advancements that can disadvantage the player , we must re-think about having softer coaches who may not helpful.

What is the conclusion of the argument = eventually author is suggesting people to re-think their view towards the role of coach.

A. The first is the main conclusion of the passage; the second opposes that conclusion.
Now if we are considering stmt1 to be the main conclusion of the argument, it means we are not considering author's view. hence, any answer choice that suggests stmt 1 is an main conclusion is incorrect.

B. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.
stmt 1 is the intermediation or conclusion from common belief that argument is opposing. stmt 2 is not the conclusion as we found the conclusion above different, however, stmt 2 is helping to form authors conclusion. so i could say this is true, keep the answer.

C. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
stmt 1 is the intermediation or conclusion from common belief that argument is opposing. stmt 2 is not the conclusion as we found the conclusion above different.

D. The first is a consideration that has been used to oppose the main conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.
stmt 1 is the conclusion of people's view , it is not being used to oppose anything. it is used to present the argument.

E. The first has been used to support the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.
stmt 1 is the intermediation or conclusion from common belief that argument is opposing. it is not author's eventual conclusion

so far B is the best answer!
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 44
Reviews Badge
A view fast gaining popularity is that international  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2019, 16:26
1
Conclusion :- No sportsperson, however skilled, is flawless in technique and letting such lacuna aggravate is bound to have serious repercussions

BF1 - the role of a coach must be more of a people manager and a facilitator
Main conclusion opposes this statement.

BF2- lack of technical advancements may outmode tomorrow, a competitive sportsperson today.
This statement supports the Main Conclusion

A. The first is the main conclusion of the passage; the second opposes that conclusion.
Incorrect :- As per analysis - first is not the main conclusion.
B. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.
Correct :- According to the analysis.
C. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
Incorrect :-Second is the not the main conclusion
D. The first is a consideration that has been used to oppose the main conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.
Incorrect :- first is not used to oppose the main conclusion
E. The first has been used to support the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.
Incorrect :- First has not been used to support the main conclusion
_________________
Nothing comes easy ! Neither do i want !!
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
P
Joined: 18 Jan 2018
Posts: 307
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Healthcare
Schools: Booth '22, ISB '21, IIMB
GPA: 3.87
WE: Design (Manufacturing)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A view fast gaining popularity is that international  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2019, 20:44
1
A view fast gaining popularity is that international coaches emphasizing on technique and relying on a strict training regimen are overdoing their job. After all, at the highest level, the professional sportsmen lack neither the skill nor the expertise to perform; therefore, the role of a coach must be more of a people manager and a facilitator. A crucial aspect such proponents miss is that no sportsperson, however skilled, is flawless in technique and letting such lacuna aggravate is bound to have serious repercussions; furthermore, given the highly dynamic and competitive nature of the modern day sport, lack of technical advancements may outmode tomorrow, a competitive sportsperson today. Clearly, those arguing for softer coaching at the highest level must rethink.

Bold 1 :View 1 of some of the people - conclusion of proponents - which the arguments contradicts

Bold 2 :View of the author - a fact , supporting the conclusion

A. The first is the main conclusion of the passage; the second opposes that conclusion.-Incorrect
First is not the main conclusion and second doesn't directly contradict - it supports the conclusion opposing first

B. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.-Correct
First is the conclusion given by the proponents and second is a fact presented to support main conclusion


C. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.-Incorrect
Second is not the main conclusion of the passage

D. The first is a consideration that has been used to oppose the main conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.-Incorrect
Author oppose to the first rather than first oppose the main conclusion

E. The first has been used to support the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.-Incorrect
First is the view of Proponents and that is opposed by the author . So first is not the main conclusion.

Option B is the correct Answer
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 12 Mar 2018
Posts: 83
Location: United States
Re: A view fast gaining popularity is that international  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2019, 20:56
1
A view fast gaining popularity is that international coaches emphasizing on technique and relying on a strict training regimen are overdoing their job. After all, at the highest level, the professional sportsmen lack neither the skill nor the expertise to perform; therefore, the role of a coach must be more of a people manager and a facilitator. A crucial aspect such proponents miss is that no sportsperson, however skilled, is flawless in technique and letting such lacuna aggravate is bound to have serious repercussions; furthermore, given the highly dynamic and competitive nature of the modern day sport, lack of technical advancements may outmode tomorrow, a competitive sportsperson today. Clearly, those arguing for softer coaching at the highest level must rethink.

In the argument above, the portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is the main conclusion of the passage; the second opposes that conclusion. Incorrect. The first is not the main conclusion of the passage
B. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument. Correct. The first is a conclusion of the proponent of softer coaching and the argument seeks to oppose that. The second is a consideration (the keyword here in the second BF that makes it a consideration as opposed to an evidence is the word "may") in support of the main conclusion.
C. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is the main conclusion of the argument. Incorrect. The second is not the main conclusion.
D. The first is a consideration that has been used to oppose the main conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence presented to support the main conclusion of the argument. Incorrect. The first is not a consideration, but a conclusion.
E. The first has been used to support the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument. Incorrect. First is not used to support the main conclusion.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: A view fast gaining popularity is that international   [#permalink] 16 Jul 2019, 20:56

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4    Next  [ 79 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

A view fast gaining popularity is that international

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne