Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 12:14 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 12:14
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,303
Own Kudos:
49,309
 [16]
Given Kudos: 6,180
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,303
Kudos: 49,309
 [16]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
15
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
p456
Joined: 20 Aug 2023
Last visit: 18 Jun 2024
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 31
Posts: 39
Kudos: 203
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Elite097
Joined: 20 Apr 2022
Last visit: 08 Oct 2025
Posts: 771
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 346
Location: India
GPA: 3.64
Posts: 771
Kudos: 553
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
hallfootball
Joined: 15 Nov 2015
Last visit: 06 Feb 2025
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
11
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q79 V82 DI80
GMAT 1: 590 Q48 V23
GMAT 2: 670 Q48 V34
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q79 V82 DI80
GMAT 2: 670 Q48 V34
Posts: 30
Kudos: 11
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Part 1: Mrs. Lands's four children will receive more than $1 million each when the estate is settled.

Total value of assests = 227 + 552 + 509 + 442 + 139 = 1469K

Total value of expenes = 100 + 100 + 100 + 100 = 400K
(100K for settling of affairs, 100K donated to the Children's Hospital and Trial Medical Clinic, 100K is to be donated to local cancer charities, and 100K is to be donated to the creation of an entirely new exhibit at the Landers Field Zoo.)

Remaining value (to be distributed among all her children) = 1069K

Hence, the answer is No.

Part 2: The total estate is valued at more than $3 million.

Total value of assests = 227 + 1300+ 509 + 442 + 139 = 2617K

The real estate is now valued at 1.3 Million and that's the only change in valuation.

Hence, the answer is No.

Part 3: Mrs. Lands had more than three sources of investment income at the time of her retirement.

Sources of income:

1. Stocks and Bond Portfolio
2. Savings, CD, Money Market
3. Other Funds & Assets

Therefore, a total of 3 sources of investment income.

Hence, the answer is No.
User avatar
pintukr
Joined: 03 Jul 2022
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,591
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 22
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Products:
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Posts: 1,591
Kudos: 1,089
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. Mrs. Lands's four children will receive more than $1 million each when the estate is settled.

Total value = $ 1.75 million (approx as per Tab # 2)) + $ 1.3 million (mother's home) = $ 2.05 million

Total Donation (Tab#1) = $ 0.4 million

Remaining ( for four children) = $ 1.65 million (for four children)

hence, Mrs. Lands's four children will receive less than $1 million each when the estate is settled

NO is the correct answer



B. The total estate is valued at more than $3 million.

Total value = $ 1.75 million (approx as per Tab # 2)) + $ 1.3 million (mother's home) = $ 2.05 million


NO is the correct answer


C. Mrs. Lands had more than three sources of investment income at the time of her retirement.

Mrs. Lands had five sources of investment income (as per Tab # 2) , besides the home.


YES is the correct answer
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,303
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,180
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,303
Kudos: 49,309
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official Explanation

Statement 1: The total value of the estate is $3,169,000. Mrs. Lands made significant contributions to several charities in her will, pushing the total value to just under $3 million, which must be divided between her four children. They will receive less than $1 million each.

Statement 2: The total value of the estate is $3,169,000. This is found by adding the value of all of Mrs. Lands's liquid assets together, along with the value of her domicile.

Statement 3: Mrs. Lands did have more than three sources of investment income at the time of her death, but the documents of her will and estate do not specify when the investments were made, so it cannot be assumed that she had them at the time of her retirement.
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,303
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,180
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,303
Kudos: 49,309
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello Everyone!

OA to this question is:

No, Yes, and No

Official explanation is also posted.
User avatar
Elite097
Joined: 20 Apr 2022
Last visit: 08 Oct 2025
Posts: 771
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 346
Location: India
GPA: 3.64
Posts: 771
Kudos: 553
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sajjad1994 explanation for third is not at all clear. If she had more than three sources till death then we have the answer . How will time of investments made help??? And when did she have the estate and liquid assets - isn’t it from her will time to death? So if that’s the case then anyway we know that she had more than 3

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
p456
Joined: 20 Aug 2023
Last visit: 18 Jun 2024
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 31
Posts: 39
Kudos: 203
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Elite097
Sajjad1994 explanation for third is not at all clear. If she had more than three sources till death then we have the answer . How will time of investments made help??? And when did she have the estate and liquid assets - isn’t it from her will time to death? So if that’s the case then anyway we know that she had more than 3

Posted from my mobile device

Hi Elite097

Let me see if i can explain. Suppose Mrs Shirley Lands was 75 years old. Till 75, she did not have any liquid assets except savings account. It was a month of January. She decided to invest in stocks, life insurance and other liquid assets. She invested on 15th of January. Then she died exactly 10 minutes after or other day(i am being ruthless, sorry for that, but i suppose this is what explanation meant). As a result, her Will did not get updated and main part, we don't know what time investments were made. So there is a possibility that she could have enjoyed retirement benefits or she could not have(so pity of her).

I assume this what the explanation by Sajjad1994 meant. Let me know if it's clear.
User avatar
rmahe11
Joined: 13 Oct 2023
Last visit: 15 Aug 2025
Posts: 112
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99
Posts: 112
Kudos: 27
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I dont agree with third one , Even real estate is an investment , the value has appreciated and it wont be sold less than 1.3 million dollars .
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,303
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,180
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,303
Kudos: 49,309
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rmahe11
I dont agree with third one , Even real estate is an investment , the value has appreciated and it wont be sold less than 1.3 million dollars .
The third statement is not about value but rather time. We don't know the date of her investments, and this is enough to say that we cannot infer this information, and the answer is No.
 
User avatar
NPProb
Joined: 20 Oct 2024
Last visit: 01 Mar 2025
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 798
Posts: 25
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Elite097
Sajjad1994 explanation for third is not at all clear. If she had more than three sources till death then we have the answer . How will time of investments made help??? And when did she have the estate and liquid assets - isn’t it from her will time to death? So if that’s the case then anyway we know that she had more than 3

Posted from my mobile device
I also chose Yes. I guess what the OA is trying to say is that how many investments did she own "at the time point when she retired", but we treated the expression "the time of her retirement" as "during the time period of her retirement".
This question... I don't know what to say...
User avatar
mkeshri185
Joined: 01 May 2025
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 90
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 90
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Why are we adding House price again? It should come under real estate isn't it?
Also there are indeed more than 3 sources of income through investments
Elite097
i) Mrs. Lands's four children will receive more than $1 million each when the estate is settled
Estate value =1.3 mn
Liquid assets =1.869
Total = 3.169
Since the amount is < 4 mn thus each child will get less than 1 mn
false

ii) The total estate is valued at more than $3 million- True
The estate is appraised at (1.3 mn)+ estate liquid assets (1.869 mn)= 3.169 mn

iii) Mrs. Lands had more than three sources of investment income at the time of her retirement- Stocks, Real Estate, Savings are sources of income- False
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,336
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mkeshri185
Why are we adding House price again? It should come under real estate isn't it?
Also there are indeed more than 3 sources of income through investments

1. The $552,000 “Real Estate” is part of the liquid-asset estimate. That list explicitly says it excludes the current domicile (meaning her personal residence or home). The house is separately appraised at $1.3M in the letter, so adding the house is not double counting. It’s outside the $552,000.

2. The documents show her assets at death, not at the time of her retirement. Those are separate points in time, so the data cannot confirm what she held or earned income from when she retired. Therefore, the inference is not supported.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105390 posts
496 posts