It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 12:20

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Despite the fact that the health-inspection procedures for

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 27 Feb 2004
Posts: 185

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Location: illinois
Despite the fact that the health-inspection procedures for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Mar 2004, 14:26
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (01:14) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Despite the fact that the health-inspection procedures for catering establishment are more stringent than those for ordinary restaurants, more of the cases of food poisoning reported to the city health department were brought on by banquets served by catering services than were brought on my restaurant meals.

Which of the following, if true, helps explain the apparent paradox in the statement above?

a. A significantly larger number of people eat in restaurants than attend catered banquets in any given time period.
b. Catering establishments know how many people they expect to serve, and therefore are less likely than restaurants to have, and serve, leftover food, a major source of food poisoning.
c. Many restaurants provide catering services for banquets in addition to serving individual meals.
d. The number of reported food-poisioning cases at catered baquets is unrelated to whether the meal is served on the catererтАЩs or the clientтАЩs premises.
e. People are unlikely to make a connection between a meal they have eaten and a subsequent illness unless the illness strikes a group who are in communication with one another

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 12 Mar 2004
Posts: 23

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: Falls Church, VA

### Show Tags

12 Mar 2004, 14:38

Rajbhai

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 292

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Location: US

### Show Tags

12 Mar 2004, 14:42
E.

"e. People are unlikely to make a connection between a meal they have eaten and a subsequent illness unless the illness strikes a group who are in communication with one another"

Means that people who get sick from eating at a restaurant will not associate their subsequent illness with the restaurant but when many people get sick while at a catered banquet, it's easy to point fingers at the caterer.

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 12 Mar 2004
Posts: 23

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: Falls Church, VA

### Show Tags

12 Mar 2004, 14:50
ndidi, You are so right . . . . . . I go with you.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 21

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Location: USA

### Show Tags

12 Mar 2004, 15:29
I agree with ndidi, however I was thinking of c, but if c is true then the cases brought to the city health department should have also come from hotels as the same food was served.
Why there was no case reported from any hotel customer is very well answered by the choice E if it is true.
Hence the answer ( in my opinion) is E.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Aug 2003
Posts: 460

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

Location: In the middle of nowhere

### Show Tags

12 Mar 2004, 15:38
with the crowd....E...

Vivek.
_________________

"Start By Doing What Is Necessary ,Then What Is Possible & Suddenly You Will Realise That You Are Doing The Impossible"

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 27 Feb 2004
Posts: 185

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Location: illinois

### Show Tags

15 Mar 2004, 13:50
Sorry for the late reply..Was sick...Sorry...

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

15 Mar 2004, 13:50
Display posts from previous: Sort by