Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: If abcd is not equal to zero, is abcd <0 ? [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Mar 2016, 07:42

I got E somehow ...

If we see all the posibilities of a, b, c and d: a could be > 0 and a could be < 0. All b, c, d must be > 0. (Because the number like 1-111, one thousand minus one hundred eleven and one, doesnt exist) (1) If a/b > c/d

c/d must be > 0. Then a/b must be > 0. Then a and b must be both > 0.

abcd >0 (suff)

(2) b/a > d/c d/c must be > 0. Then b/a must be > 0. Then a and b must be both > 0. abcd >0 (suff)

If we see all the posibilities of a, b, c and d: a could be > 0 and a could be < 0. All b, c, d must be > 0. (Because the number like 1-111, one thousand minus one hundred eleven and one, doesnt exist) (1) If a/b > c/d

c/d must be > 0. Then a/b must be > 0. Then a and b must be both > 0.

abcd >0 (suff)

(2) b/a > d/c d/c must be > 0. Then b/a must be > 0. Then a and b must be both > 0. abcd >0 (suff)

Pls correct me if Im wrong.

Hi, abcd is not a 4-digit number .. abcd= a*b*c*d...

The Q tells us that \(abcd \neq{0}\)... so none of a,b,c or d is 0..

lets see the statements

1)\(\frac{a}{b} > \frac{c}{d}\) => \(\frac{a}{b} - \frac{c}{d}>0\) \(\frac{(ad-bc)}{bd}>0\) so two cases.. 1) If ad-bc>0, then bd>0 this means if ad>bc, then bd>0 2)If ad-bc<0, then bd<0 this means if ad<bc, then bd<0 Insuff

2) \(\frac{b}{a} > \frac{d}{c}\) => \(\frac{b}{a} - \frac{d}{c}>0\) \(\frac{(bc-ad)}{ac}>0\) so two cases.. 1) If bc-ad>0, then ac>0 this means if bc>ad, then ac>0 2)If bc-ad<0, then ac<0 this means if bc<ad, then ac<0 Insuff

combined- two cases 1) If bc>ad, then ac>0 and bd<0 .. so ac*bd<0 or abcd<0 2) If bc<ad, then ac<0 and bd>0.. so ac*bd>0 or abcd<0 Suff C
_________________

Re: If abcd is not equal to zero, is abcd <0 ? [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Mar 2016, 08:28

1

This post received KUDOS

chetan2u wrote:

samichange wrote:

If abcd is not equal to zero ,is abcd <0 ?

1) a/b > c/d

2) b/a > d/c

Please provide solution !

I donot mind Kudos

Hi,

The Q tells us that \(abcd \neq{0}\)... so none of a,b,c or d is 0..

lets see the statements

1)\(\frac{a}{b} > \frac{c}{d}\) => \(\frac{a}{b} - \frac{c}{d}>0\) \(\frac{(ad-bc)}{bd}>0\) so two cases.. 1) If ad-bc>0, then bd>0 this means if ad>bc, then bd>0 2)If ad-bc<0, then bd<0 this means if ad<bc, then bd<0 Insuff

2) \(\frac{b}{a} > \frac{d}{c}\) => \(\frac{b}{a} - \frac{d}{c}>0\) \(\frac{(bc-ad)}{ac}>0\) so two cases.. 1) If bc-ad>0, then ac>0 this means if bc>ad, then ac>0 2)If bc-ad<0, then ac<0 this means if bc<ad, then ac<0 Insuff

combined- two cases 1) If bc>ad, then ac>0 and bd>0 .. so ac*bd>0 or abcd>0 2) If bc<ad, then ac<0 and bd<0.. so ac*bd>0 or abcd>0 Suff C

Great solution.

However I think it should be 1) If bc>ad, then ac>0 and bd<0 .. so ac*bd<0 or abcd<0 2) If bc<ad, then ac<0 and bd>0.. so ac*bd<0 or abcd<0

Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.

If abcd is not equal to zero ,is abcd <0 ?

1) a/b > c/d

2) b/a > d/c

In the original condition, there are 4 variables(a,b,c,d), which should match with the number of equations. So you need 4 equations. For 1) 1 equation, for 2) 1 equation, which is likely to make E the answer. When 1) & 2), a/b>c/d, a/b-c/d>0, (ad-bc)/bd > 0 is derived and becomes b/a>d/c, b/a-d/c >0, (cb- da) /ca >0. Since they both are positive integers, multiply the both equations. Then, (ad-bc)(cb-da)/abcd>0, (ad-bc)^2/abcd<0 is derived. As (ad-bc)^2>0 is always valid, abcd<0, which is yes. Thus, the answer is C.

For cases where we need 3 more equations, such as original conditions with“3 variables”, or “4 variables and 1 equation”, or “5 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 80% chance that E is the answer (especially about 90% of 2 by 2 questions where there are more than 3 variables), while C has 15% chance. These two are the majority. In case of common mistake type 3,4, the answer may be from A, B or D but there is only 5% chance. Since E is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition (It saves us time). Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, C or D.
_________________

Re: If abcd is not equal to zero, is abcd <0 ? [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Jun 2016, 18:06

chetan2u wrote:

samichange wrote:

If abcd is not equal to zero ,is abcd <0 ?

1) a/b > c/d

2) b/a > d/c

Please provide solution !

I donot mind Kudos

Hi,

The Q tells us that \(abcd \neq{0}\)... so none of a,b,c or d is 0..

lets see the statements

1)\(\frac{a}{b} > \frac{c}{d}\) => \(\frac{a}{b} - \frac{c}{d}>0\) \(\frac{(ad-bc)}{bd}>0\) so two cases.. 1) If ad-bc>0, then bd>0 this means if ad>bc, then bd>0 2)If ad-bc<0, then bd<0 this means if ad<bc, then bd<0 Insuff

2) \(\frac{b}{a} > \frac{d}{c}\) => \(\frac{b}{a} - \frac{d}{c}>0\) \(\frac{(bc-ad)}{ac}>0\) so two cases.. 1) If bc-ad>0, then ac>0 this means if bc>ad, then ac>0 2)If bc-ad<0, then ac<0 this means if bc<ad, then ac<0 Insuff

combined- two cases 1) If bc>ad, then ac>0 and bd<0 .. so ac*bd<0 or abcd<0 2) If bc<ad, then ac<0 and bd>0.. so ac*bd>0 or abcd<0 Suff C

Hi chetan2u,

I understand why (1) and (2) by themselves are insufficient, but I do not understand why combining them is sufficient. Can you please elaborate?

Re: If abcd is not equal to zero, is abcd <0 ? [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Oct 2016, 12:13

2

This post was BOOKMARKED

samichange wrote:

If abcd is not equal to zero ,is abcd <0 ?

1) a/b > c/d

2) b/a > d/c

Please provide solution !

I donot mind Kudos

Another approach. In inequalities when we take the reciprocals of the two sides we flip the inequality sign 5 > 3 => 1/5 < 1/3 or -5 <- 3 => -1/5 > -1/3

However, when 1 side is positive and the other negative we do not flip the inequality – the positive side is always greater than the negative side.

5 > -3 => 1/5 > - 1/3

In this case, statement 2 is the reciprocal of statement 1, and the sign is not flipped; this means that a*b is positive and c*d is negative, so a*b*c*d < 0

Statement 1: a/b > c/d There are several values of a, b, c and d that satisfy statement 1. Here are two: Case a: a = 1, b = 1, c = 1, d = 2. Plugging these values into the statement 1 inequality, we get 1/1 > 1/2, which works. In this case, abcd = (1)(1)(1)(2) = 2. So, abcd > 0 Case b: a = 1, b = 1, c = -1, d = 2. Plugging these values into the statement 1 inequality, we get 1/1 > -1/2, which works. In this case, abcd = (1)(1)(-1)(2) = -2. So, abcd < 0 Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: b/a > d/c There are several values of a, b, c and d that satisfy statement 2. Here are two: Case a: a = 1, b = 1, c = 2, d = 1. Plugging these values into the statement 2 inequality, we get 1/1 > 1/2, which works. In this case, abcd = (1)(1)(2)(1) = 2. So, abcd > 0 Case b: a = 1, b = 1, c = 2, d = -1. Plugging these values into the statement 2 inequality, we get 1/1 > -1/2, which works. In this case, abcd = (1)(1)(2)(-1) = -2. So, abcd < 0 Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined Statement 1 tells us that a/b > c/d Statement 2 tells us that b/a > d/c So, the fraction a/b is greater than the fraction c/d When we invert the two fractions, b/a is also greater than d/c This should strike us as odd. In MOST cases, when we invert two fractions in an inequality, the inequality symbol should reverse. For example, 2/3 < 7/6 and 3/2 > 6/7 Likewise, 1/30 > 1/50 and 30/1 < 50/1 Notice that in my above examples, both fractions are POSITIVE

The same holds true when both fractions are NEGATIVE For example, -2/3 < -1/6 and -3/2 > -6/1 Likewise, -5/7 > -10/3 and -7/5 < -3/10

The COMBINED statements tell a different story. Here, when we invert the fractions, the inequality symbol does NOT reverse. This means that it is not the case that both fractions are POSITIVE, and it is not the case that both fractions are NEGATIVE So, one fraction must be positive and one fraction must be negative. In both inequalities, the fractions with the c and d are LESS THAN the fractions with a and b So, it must be the case that the fractions c/d and d/c are both NEGATIVE And the fractions a/b and b/a are both POSITIVE

If fractions c/d and d/c are both NEGATIVE, then the product cd is also NEGATIVE If fractions a/b and b/a are both POSITIVE, then the product ab is POSITIVE So, abcd = (POSITIVE)(NEGATIVE) = SOME NEGATIVE VALUE In other words, abcd < 0 Since we can answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT