Last visit was: 27 Mar 2025, 03:36 It is currently 27 Mar 2025, 03:36
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Sub 505 Level|   Inequalities|                                          
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 27 Mar 2025
Posts: 100,109
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 92,731
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 100,109
Kudos: 711,241
 [32]
Kudos
Add Kudos
32
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 27 Mar 2025
Posts: 100,109
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 92,731
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 100,109
Kudos: 711,241
 [15]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
code19
Joined: 23 Jun 2008
Last visit: 05 Feb 2014
Posts: 69
Own Kudos:
68
 [9]
Given Kudos: 24
Location: Australia
Schools: AGSM '21
GMAT Date: 04-01-2014
Schools: AGSM '21
Posts: 69
Kudos: 68
 [9]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
AKG1593
Joined: 20 Dec 2013
Last visit: 30 Mar 2024
Posts: 182
Own Kudos:
306
 [1]
Given Kudos: 35
Location: India
Posts: 182
Kudos: 306
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
From S1:if xz>yz
and x,y,z are +ve,we can cancel out z to conclude x>y.But nothing is given about z.So insufficient.

From S2:x>z.Nothing is given about y.Insufficient.

Combining the two we get,x>y and x>z.
But whether y>/<z is not known.So insufficient.

Ans.E
avatar
amz14
Joined: 20 Nov 2013
Last visit: 10 Dec 2017
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
30
 [1]
Given Kudos: 188
Schools: LBS '17
Schools: LBS '17
Posts: 19
Kudos: 30
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ans E

We know that all are positive integers so we can divide by the variable without changing the sign.

From1:
xz>yz --> x>y Insufficient

From2:
yx>yz --> x>z Insufficient

Combining both:
x>z and x>y but we don't know anything about how y compares to z . Insufficient.
avatar
kronint
Joined: 21 Jan 2014
Last visit: 17 Aug 2015
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
3
 [3]
Posts: 4
Kudos: 3
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Although the correct answer is E, can we apply the following approach? (if not, then why can't we use it?)
At the beginning, we conclude that (1) and (2) (if used separately) are not sufficient. Then, we combine these 2 inequalities, in other words, we form a system of 2 inequalities. Since x,y,z are variables, and we don’t know their signs, we cannot multiply. But we can subtract (2) from (1). As a result, this operation yields: xz-yx>yz-yz => xz-yx>0 => xz>yx => z>y => x>z>y => C
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 27 Mar 2025
Posts: 100,109
Own Kudos:
711,241
 [5]
Given Kudos: 92,731
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 100,109
Kudos: 711,241
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kronint
Although the correct answer is E, can we apply the following approach? (if not, then why can't we use it?)
At the beginning, we conclude that (1) and (2) (if used separately) are not sufficient. Then, we combine these 2 inequalities, in other words, we form a system of 2 inequalities. Since x,y,z are variables, and we don’t know their signs, we cannot multiply. But we can subtract (2) from (1). As a result, this operation yields: xz-yx>yz-yz => xz-yx>0 => xz>yx => z>y => x>z>y => C

No, that's not correct. You cannot subtract yx > yz from xz > yz because their signs are in the same direction (> and >).

ADDING/SUBTRACTING INEQUALITIES:


You can only add inequalities when their signs are in the same direction:

If \(a>b\) and \(c>d\) (signs in same direction: \(>\) and \(>\)) --> \(a+c>b+d\).
Example: \(3<4\) and \(2<5\) --> \(3+2<4+5\).

You can only apply subtraction when their signs are in the opposite directions:

If \(a>b\) and \(c<d\) (signs in opposite direction: \(>\) and \(<\)) --> \(a-c>b-d\) (take the sign of the inequality you subtract from).
Example: \(3<4\) and \(5>1\) --> \(3-5<4-1\).

Adding/subtracting/multiplying/dividing inequalities: help-with-add-subtract-mult-divid-multiple-inequalities-155290.html

Hope it helps.
avatar
TomSplashy
Joined: 28 Nov 2016
Last visit: 24 Jan 2017
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 35
Posts: 5
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
When I plug in numbers for

X > Y > Z such as 3 > 2 > 1 or 20 > 10 > 2

the equations from (1) and (2) are always right. Any idea why the answer is still E?

Thanks a lot in advance!
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 27 Mar 2025
Posts: 100,109
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 92,731
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 100,109
Kudos: 711,241
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TomSplashy
When I plug in numbers for

X > Y > Z such as 3 > 2 > 1 or 20 > 10 > 2

the equations from (1) and (2) are always right. Any idea why the answer is still E?

Thanks a lot in advance!

You plug the numbers that answer YES to the question and then check the equations given in (1) and (2). That#s not correct. When trying to solve an YES/NO DS question with plug-in method you should try to find two sets of numbers (which satisfy given information in the stem and the statements), that give different answer to the question (one YES and another NO). For example, you can check x=10, y=5 and z=1 for an YES answer and x=10, y=1 and z=5 for a NO answer.

Hope it's clear.
User avatar
renjana
Joined: 11 Jun 2015
Last visit: 06 Dec 2019
Posts: 71
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 86
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Leadership
Posts: 71
Kudos: 30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
if x, y, and z are positive numbers, is x > y > z ?

(1) xz > yz
(2) yx > yz

Can you tell me if this method will work ?

divide eq 2 by eq 1

yx/xz>yz/yz

yx/xz>1
yx>xz
and since all are positive
y>z ?

Bunuel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 27 Mar 2025
Posts: 100,109
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 92,731
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 100,109
Kudos: 711,241
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
renjana
if x, y, and z are positive numbers, is x > y > z ?

(1) xz > yz
(2) yx > yz

Can you tell me if this method will work ?

divide eq 2 by eq 1

yx/xz>yz/yz

yx/xz>1
yx>xz
and since all are positive
y>z ?

Bunuel

You cannot divide equations like that. For example:

2 > 1
1 > 1/10

If you divide you'll get 2 > 10, which is not correct.
User avatar
ScottTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Last visit: 26 Mar 2025
Posts: 20,412
Own Kudos:
25,450
 [1]
Given Kudos: 292
Status:Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Location: United States (CA)
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 20,412
Kudos: 25,450
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
If x, y, and z are positive numbers, is x > y > z ?

(1) xz > yz
(2) yx > yz
Solution:

We need to determine whether x > y > z, given that x, y, and z are all positive.

Statement One Alone:

Dividing both sides of the inequality by z, we have:

x > y

However, since we still don’t know whether y > z, statement one alone is not sufficient.

Statement Two Alone:

Dividing both sides of the inequality by y, we have:

x > z

However, since we still don’t know whether y > z, statement two alone is not sufficient.

Statements One and Two Together:

Using both statements, we see that x > y and x > z. However, since we still don’t know whether y > z, both statements together are not sufficient.

Answer: E
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 36,712
Own Kudos:
Posts: 36,712
Kudos: 963
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderator:
Math Expert
100109 posts