GMAT Changed on April 16th - Read about the latest changes here

It is currently 23 May 2018, 20:58

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In most countries, lower taxes stimulate economic growth, which is an

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4254
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
In most countries, lower taxes stimulate economic growth, which is an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Oct 2015, 21:16
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

91% (01:14) correct 9% (02:56) wrong based on 143 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In most countries, lower taxes stimulate economic growth, which is an increase of the capacity of an economy to produce goods and services. In the nation of Tattua, economic growth is significantly higher than it is in the nation of Hothal. Clearly, therefore, Tattua's industries must, on the whole, be further advanced technologically than Hothal's are.

The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?


It offers a conclusion that is no more than a paraphrase of one of the pieces of information provided in its support.

It presents as evidence in support of a claim information that is inconsistent with other evidence presented in support of the same claim.

It takes one possible cause of a condition to be the actual cause of that condition without considering any other possible causes.

It takes a condition to be the effect of something that happened only after the condition already existed.

It makes a distinction that presupposes the truth of the conclusion that is to be established.


OA/OE after three responses
_________________

Can you solve at least some SC questions without delving into the initial statement?

Narendran 98845 44509

Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 02 May 2015
Posts: 17
Location: United States (NJ)
Schools: Wharton Exec '19
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V41
GPA: 3.4
Premium Member
Re: In most countries, lower taxes stimulate economic growth, which is an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Oct 2015, 11:49
Il go for C

The argument is taking just one condition " T's economic growth is higher than H and hence T is further technologically advanced than is H". So it considers economic growth leads to technological advancement.
Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 04 Dec 2016
Posts: 58
Location: India
GPA: 3.8
WE: Operations (Other)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: In most countries, lower taxes stimulate economic growth, which is an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Mar 2017, 00:09
In most countries, lower taxes stimulate economic growth, which is an increase of the capacity of an economy to produce goods and services. In the nation of Tattua, economic growth is significantly higher than it is in the nation of Hothal. Clearly, therefore, Tattua's industries must, on the whole, be further advanced technologically than Hothal's are.

The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?


It offers a conclusion that is no more than a paraphrase of one of the pieces of information provided in its support.

It presents as evidence in support of a claim information that is inconsistent with other evidence presented in support of the same claim.

It takes one possible cause of a condition to be the actual cause of that condition without considering any other possible causes.

It takes a condition to be the effect of something that happened only after the condition already existed.

It makes a distinction that presupposes the truth of the conclusion that is to be established.

Source: GmatFree
Board of Directors
User avatar
P
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2734
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: In most countries, lower taxes stimulate economic growth, which is an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Mar 2017, 12:25
merging topics.
please use search functions before creating new topics.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 15 Jan 2017
Posts: 361
Re: In most countries, lower taxes stimulate economic growth, which is an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2017, 12:22
B for me - the conclusion in of tech is not consistent with evidence of taxes between the two cities
Any update on OA and OE?
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 21 Nov 2016
Posts: 26
Reviews Badge
Re: In most countries, lower taxes stimulate economic growth, which is an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2017, 13:29
Go for B. Clearly inconsistent
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 18 Jan 2017
Posts: 131
Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: In most countries, lower taxes stimulate economic growth, which is an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2017, 21:49
daagh wrote:
In most countries, lower taxes stimulate economic growth, which is an increase of the capacity of an economy to produce goods and services. In the nation of Tattua, economic growth is significantly higher than it is in the nation of Hothal. Clearly, therefore, Tattua's industries must, on the whole, be further advanced technologically than Hothal's are.

The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?


It offers a conclusion that is no more than a paraphrase of one of the pieces of information provided in its support.

It presents as evidence in support of a claim information that is inconsistent with other evidence presented in support of the same claim.

It takes one possible cause of a condition to be the actual cause of that condition without considering any other possible causes.

It takes a condition to be the effect of something that happened only after the condition already existed.

It makes a distinction that presupposes the truth of the conclusion that is to be established.


OA/OE after three responses


daagh : Can you please reveal the official answer.
For me. it's B. Would love an explanation along with the answer.
_________________

A KUDO = A Thank-you. If this post helped you, please send a KUDO across.

YOU CAN LEARN ANYTHING!
MY GMAT BLOG ---> https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-fitness-mat-some-music-few-books-and-the-gmat-245808.html

Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 172
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GPA: 3.32
Reviews Badge
In most countries, lower taxes stimulate economic growth, which is an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Sep 2017, 15:58
I believe it is (C)

In most countries, lower taxes stimulate economic growth, which is an increase of the capacity of an economy to produce goods and services. In the nation of Tattua, economic growth is significantly higher than it is in the nation of Hothal. Clearly, therefore, Tattua's industries must, on the whole, be further advanced technologically than Hothal's are.

The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?


It offers a conclusion that is no more than a paraphrase of one of the pieces of information provided in its support.

It presents as evidence in support of a claim information that is inconsistent with other evidence presented in support of the same claim. -- How is this inconsistent with the evidence presented? Economy A is better than Economy B because of better technology. Is this inconsistent? In my opinion, no, as it is a reasonable conclusion based on the evidence presented.

It takes one possible cause of a condition to be the actual cause of that condition without considering any other possible causes. -- Economy A is better than Economy B -- Why? Because of more advanced technology. What about better workers? More educated work force? Clearly, (C) highlights this issue

It takes a condition to be the effect of something that happened only after the condition already existed.

It makes a distinction that presupposes the truth of the conclusion that is to be established.
_________________

D-Day: November 18th, 2017

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 04 Nov 2015
Posts: 34
Re: In most countries, lower taxes stimulate economic growth, which is an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Sep 2017, 04:59
nightblade354 wrote:
I believe it is (C)

In most countries, lower taxes stimulate economic growth, which is an increase of the capacity of an economy to produce goods and services. In the nation of Tattua, economic growth is significantly higher than it is in the nation of Hothal. Clearly, therefore, Tattua's industries must, on the whole, be further advanced technologically than Hothal's are.

The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?


It offers a conclusion that is no more than a paraphrase of one of the pieces of information provided in its support.

It presents as evidence in support of a claim information that is inconsistent with other evidence presented in support of the same claim. -- How is this inconsistent with the evidence presented? Economy A is better than Economy B because of better technology. Is this inconsistent? In my opinion, no, as it is a reasonable conclusion based on the evidence presented.

It takes one possible cause of a condition to be the actual cause of that condition without considering any other possible causes. -- Economy A is better than Economy B -- Why? Because of more advanced technology. What about better workers? More educated work force? Clearly, (C) highlights this issue

It takes a condition to be the effect of something that happened only after the condition already existed.

It makes a distinction that presupposes the truth of the conclusion that is to be established.


Answer has to be C.
Experts can you please confirm .
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 09 Oct 2017
Posts: 1
Re: In most countries, lower taxes stimulate economic growth, which is an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Nov 2017, 22:58
IMO C.

daagh - Could you share the OA please?
Expert Post
Top Contributor
Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4254
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: In most countries, lower taxes stimulate economic growth, which is an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Nov 2017, 23:29
Expert's post
Top Contributor
Please look int the link given herein; the topic was taken from this source

<http://www.gmatfree.com/module-79/taxes-and-growth/?explanation=1>
The OA is C according to the source
_________________

Can you solve at least some SC questions without delving into the initial statement?

Narendran 98845 44509

Re: In most countries, lower taxes stimulate economic growth, which is an   [#permalink] 15 Nov 2017, 23:29
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In most countries, lower taxes stimulate economic growth, which is an

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.