samarpan.g28
In question 4, are we not talking about potential harms and hype about COX-2? In my opinion, option B is correct. Kindly someone explain why D is correct.
The passage provides information about the introduction of COX-2 inhibitors, starting with the discovery of the relationship between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) like aspirin and prostaglandins by John Vane in 1971. It explains the role of prostaglandins and the three forms of the enzyme cyclooxygenase (COX-1, COX-2, and COX-3) in the human body. The passage then discusses the development of COX-2 inhibitors in the 1990s as an attempt to eliminate the side effects associated with drugs like aspirin, which inhibit both COX-1 and COX-2. The subsequent revelation of serious side effects in some COX-2 inhibitors, despite initially successful clinical trials, is also discussed. Overall, the passage aims to describe the reasons behind the introduction of COX-2 inhibitors and the outcomes that followed.
Option B is incorrect because the passage does not aim to initiate a debate. Instead, it primarily provides information and presents facts regarding COX-2 inhibitors, their development, and the challenges associated with their use. The passage doesn't present conflicting viewpoints or actively engage in a debate about the benefits of COX-2 inhibitors.
The passage is more focused on delivering information about the discovery of prostaglandins, the role of COX enzymes, the development of COX-2 inhibitors, and the challenges and side effects associated with these drugs. The tone is informative rather than argumentative or debatable. Therefore,
option D better captures the main purpose of the passage.