Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 09:49 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 09:49
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Sub 505 Level|   Geometry|                                       
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,389
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,389
Kudos: 778,288
 [36]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
33
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Donnie84
Joined: 04 Jan 2014
Last visit: 25 Jun 2025
Posts: 496
Own Kudos:
268
 [9]
Given Kudos: 15
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V32
GMAT 2: 630 Q48 V28
GMAT 3: 680 Q48 V35
GMAT 3: 680 Q48 V35
Posts: 496
Kudos: 268
 [9]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,389
Own Kudos:
778,288
 [5]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,389
Kudos: 778,288
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
anandprk
Joined: 06 Feb 2014
Last visit: 24 May 2025
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
19
 [2]
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 4
Kudos: 19
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Note: The perimeter of the two figures if fixed. For a square, we can calculate this if we know any one measurement (side, diagonal). However, the shape of the triangle can vary for a fixed perimeter. But as a rule : For a given perimeter, an equilateral triangle will have the maximum area. We will use this info to solve the question.

From 1: s/t =4/5 (here s= side of the square & t= side of the triangle) => s=4x & t=5x (using ratios)
Now, we can evaluate and compare their area. (but we don't need to calculate, just know that we can)
{SUFFICIENT option A or D possible}
From 2: s+t=18. (2 unknowns and 1 equation) => cannot be solved {INSUFFICIENT}

Answer A
avatar
anmol26
Joined: 28 Aug 2018
Last visit: 07 Oct 2019
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 19
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi All,

My answer to the above question is A too.

However as per Manhattan Guide, the answer is D. I am pasting the solution printed in Manhattan here. Can anyone explain to me why is D right?

Solution as per Manhattan: n either a square or an equilateral triangle, you can …nd out just
about any measurement from any other measurement. In a square, for instance,
the length of a side can give you area, perimeter, or the length of the diagonal.
In an equilateral triangle, the base and height are always related in the same
ratio, so knowing the area gives you perimeter, the length of the height, or the
length of any side.
Statement (1), then, is sufficient. If you know the ratio of the areas, you
can determine the ratio of the perimeters. To do so, you'd have to find the
ratio between the perimeter of a square and the area of a square, and also
the perimeter of an equilateral triangle and the area of an equilateral triangle.
While you won’t spend the time to do so on this question, the fact that you
could means that the given ratio is sufficient.
Statement (2) is also sufficient. Again, since sides of squares and equilateral
triangles always have the same ratios to the perimeters of the same figures,
knowing the ratio between the sides of these two figures is enough to determine
the relationship between the perimeters of the figures. Choice (D) is correct.


Thanks
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 6,739
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,739
Kudos: 35,344
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
The Official Guide For GMAT® Quantitative Review, 2ND Edition

Is the perimeter of square S greater than the perimeter of equilateral triangle T?

(1) The ratio of the length of a side of S to the length of a side of T is 4:5.
(2) The sum of the lengths of a side of S and a side of T is 18.

Target question: Is the perimeter of square S greater than the perimeter of equilateral triangle T?

Statement 1: The ratio of the length of a side of S to the length of a side of T is 4:5.
Let x = the length of EACH side of the square
Let y = the length of EACH side of the equilateral triangle

So, we can write: x/y = 4/5
Cross multiply to get: 5x = 4y
Divide both sides by 5 to get x =4y/5
We can also write: x = 0.8y

The perimeter of the equilateral triangle = y + y + y = 3y
The perimeter of the square = x + x + x + x = 4x

Since we now know x = 0.8y, we can replace x with 0.8y to get:
The perimeter of the square = 0.8y + 0.8y + 0.8y + 0.8y = 3.2y

Since the perimeter of the equilateral triangle = 3y, and the perimeter of the square = 3.2y, the answer to the target question is YES, the perimeter of square S is greater than the perimeter of equilateral triangle T
Statement 1 is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: The sum of the lengths of a side of S and a side of T is 18.
There are several scenarios that satisfy statement 2. Here are two:
Case a: Each side of the square has length 17, and each side of the equilateral triangle has length 1. So the perimeter of the square = 17 + 17 + 17 + 17 = 68, and the perimeter of the triangle = 1 + 1 + 1 = 3. In this case, the answer to the target question is YES, the perimeter of square S is greater than the perimeter of equilateral triangle T
Case b: Each side of the square has length 1, and each side of the equilateral triangle has length 18. So the perimeter of the square = 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 4, and the perimeter of the triangle = 17 + 17 + 17 = 51. In this case, the answer to the target question is NOT, the perimeter of square S is not greater than the perimeter of equilateral triangle T
Since we can’t answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer: A

Cheers,
Brent
User avatar
ScottTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 21,716
Own Kudos:
26,996
 [1]
Given Kudos: 300
Status:Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Location: United States (CA)
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 21,716
Kudos: 26,996
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
The Official Guide For GMAT® Quantitative Review, 2ND Edition

Is the perimeter of square S greater than the perimeter of equilateral triangle T?

(1) The ratio of the length of a side of S to the length of a side of T is 4:5.
(2) The sum of the lengths of a side of S and a side of T is 18.

Solution:

We need to determine whether the perimeter of square S is greater than the perimeter of equilateral triangle T. If we let s be a side of square S, then the perimeter of square S is 4s. Similarly, if we let t be a side of equilateral triangle T, then the perimeter of equilateral triangle T is 3t. Therefore, we need to determine whether 4s > 3t.

Statement One Alone:

Since the ratio of the length of a side of S to the length of a side of T is 4:5, we can let s = 4x and t = 5x where x is some positive number. So we have:

4s > 3t ?

4(4x) > 3(5x) ?

16x > 15x ?

Since x is positive, 16x is indeed greater than 15x. That is, the perimeter of square S is indeed greater than the perimeter of equilateral triangle T. Statement one alone is sufficient.

Statement Two Alone:

Knowing the sum of the lengths of a side of S and a side of T is 18 is not sufficient. For example, if s = 10 and t = 8, the 4s = 40 is greater than 3t = 24. However, if s = 7 and t = 11, then 4s = 28 is not greater than 3t = 33. Statement two alone is not sufficient.

Answer: A
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,587
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,587
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105389 posts
496 posts