GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 15 Dec 2019, 08:34 ### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

#### Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.  # Janson's salary and Karen's salary were each p percent

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

VP  Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1011
Janson's salary and Karen's salary were each p percent  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

4
40 00:00

Difficulty:   35% (medium)

Question Stats: 68% (01:36) correct 32% (01:48) wrong based on 644 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Janson's salary and Karen's salary were each p percent greater in 1998 than in 1995. What is the value of p?

(1) In 1995 Karen's salary was $2,000 greater than Jason's. (2) In 1998 Karen's salary was$2,440 greater than Jason's.
Math Expert V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59729
Janson's salary and Karen's salary were each p percent  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

8
10
anilnandyala wrote:
Janson's salary and Karen's salary were each p percent greater in 1998 than in 1995. What is the value of p?

(1) In 1995 Karen's salary was $2,000 greater than Jason's. (2) In 1998 Karen's salary was$2,440 greater than Jason's.

Given: $$j_2=j_1(1+\frac{p}{100})$$ and $$k_2=k_1(1+\frac{p}{100})$$. Qurestion: $$p=?$$

(1) $$k_1-j_1=2,000$$. Not sufficient to calculate $$p$$.
(2) $$k_2-j_2=2440$$. Not sufficient to calculate $$p$$.

(1)+(2) $$k_2-j_2=2440=k_1(1+\frac{p}{100})-j_1(1+\frac{p}{100})$$ --> $$2440=k_1(1+\frac{p}{100})-j_1(1+\frac{p}{100})=(1+\frac{p}{100})(k_1-j_1)=(1+\frac{p}{100})2,000$$ --> $$2440=(1+\frac{p}{100})2,000$$. Sufficient to to calculate $$p$$.

Or another way: difference between their salaries increased by 2440-2000=440, which is 440/2000*100=22%, but difference increases proportionally with the salaries, so increase in salary is also 22%.

_________________
Director  Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Posts: 655

### Show Tags

10
6
Answer is C. Right off the bat without doing any math.

Taken separately we don't know anything.

Taken together...

We know that their salaries grew further apart by $440. They started off in 1995 as$2,000 apart. That means the $440 increase must have come from the$2,000 difference.

440/2000 = P

(using a calculator to prove it)

440/2000 = 22% (or 2,440/2000 = 1.22)

10,000(1.22) = 12,200
12,000(1.22) = 14, 640
14,640-12,200 = 2,440

50,000(1.22) = 61,000
52,000(1.22) = 63,440
63,440-61,000 = 2,440

No need to do the math on the real test. Just realize that you know how much their salaries started and that if there is any change in the difference it must've come from the original difference in salary.

C it is.
##### General Discussion
Intern  Joined: 25 Nov 2007
Posts: 32
Re: DS: Percentage Salary Increase  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

tarek99 wrote:
Janson's salary and Karen's salary were each p percent greater in 1998 than in 1995. What is the value of p?

(1) In 1995 Karen's salary was $2,000 greater than Jason's. (2) In 1998 Karen's salary was$2,440 greater than Jason's.

A insufficient
B Insufficient

Combining
From A,
In 1995

Janson's salary = J
Karen's salary = J+2000

In 1998

Janson's salary = J*0.p + J
Karen's salary = ((J+2000) * 0.p) + (J +2000)

Also, from B
((J+2000) * 0.p) + (J +2000) = (J*0.p + J) +2440
2000*0.p=440

Ans C

Whats the OA
Director  Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Posts: 655

2
1
Not at all.

All we have to do is realize that a $2,000 difference grew to a$2,440 when multiplied by P. This makes for a 22% increase and the information holds true for any two numbers $2,000 apart. 500,000*1.22 = 610,000 502,000*1.22 = 612,440 2,000*1.22 = 2440 4,000*1.22 = 4880 answer is definitely C. Director  Joined: 12 Jul 2007 Posts: 655 ### Show Tags 7 1 tnguyen707 wrote: eschn3am wrote: Not at all. All we have to do is realize that a$2,000 difference grew to a $2,440 when multiplied by P. This makes for a 22% increase and the information holds true for any two numbers$2,000 apart.

500,000*1.22 = 610,000
502,000*1.22 = 612,440

2,000*1.22 = 2440
4,000*1.22 = 4880

I tested this method, and it works. I still can't visualize it. Oh well, I guess whatever works! Try thinking of it like this.

We know that in 1995 Karen's salary was $2,000 greater than Jason's We know that in 1998 Karen's salary was$2,440 greater than Jason's

Between 1995 and 1998 each of their salaries increased by the same percentage (P)

If Jason makes $10,000 and Karen makes$12,000 then we know that Jason's 10K and Karen's first 10K each increased by the same amount. They would be dead even in 1998 if Karen didn't make $2,000 more. This means that Karen's$2,000 had to increase by $440 (to get to$2,440) all on it's own. So what percentage increase do you need for $2,000 to become$2,440? this is your answer. and that's why you can choose C without doing any math.

I'm not the best with explanations, but I hope this helps somewhat.
VP  Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1011

### Show Tags

1
OA is C. but the way i saw this, the difference of 440 didn't make any sense to me. I thought C is possible ONLY if the 2 people have the exact same salary from the beginning. but we don't even know that. a 5% increase on a salary of $10 will not yield the same as a salary of$100. that's why i picked E. both could yield different dollar amounts, but both have the same percentage increase. but after looking at the explanation, i guess if this works, then so be it. i never realised you could get to such an answer by only having the gaps between the 2 actually amounts. cool
SVP  Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 1795
Re: DS: Percentage Salary Increase  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

9
1
tarek99 wrote:
Janson's salary and Karen's salary were each p percent greater in 1998 than in 1995. What is the value of p?

(1) In 1995 Karen's salary was $2,000 greater than Jason's. (2) In 1998 Karen's salary was$2,440 greater than Jason's.

1995: Janson's salary = j
Karen's salary = k

1998: Janson's salary = j (1+p)
Karen's salary = k (1+p)

1: in 1995, k = j + 2000
2: in 1998, k(1+p) = j (1+p) + 2440

togather: k(1+p) = j (1+p) + 2440
(j + 2000) (1+p) = j (1+p) + 2440
2000 + 2000p = 2440
p = (2440 - 2000)/2000
p = 22%
Intern  Affiliations: SPE
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 8
Location: Copenhagen
Schools: Columbia, MIT, Harvard, LBS

### Show Tags

C it is.

1) insuff. as info given: J + 2000 = K, and no time scale to relate to P.
2) insuff. as above

both - I assumed suff as I think we had enough data.
solve the two equations:
J + 2000 = k
J + (J*P) + 2400 = k + (k*P)

P = 22%

Manager  Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 133

### Show Tags

Both statements alone do not help, so we have to look at both statements together.

In 1995:
Ka = Ja + 2000

In 1998:
Kb = Jb + 2400

Since Kb = Ka(1 + p/100),

Ka(1 + p/100) = Ja(1 + p/100) + 2400

Substitute Ka

(Ja + 2000)(1 + p/100) = Ja(1 + p/100) + 2400

solving we get p = 20%

Manager  Joined: 08 Sep 2010
Posts: 146
Location: India
WE 1: 6 Year, Telecom(GSM)

### Show Tags

1
satishreddy wrote:
jasons salary and karen salary were each p percent greater in 1998 than in 1995, what is the value of p

1) in 1995 karens salary was $2000 greater than jasons 1) in 1998 karens salary was$2400 greater than jasons

Combining these 2 statement we can get the value of p.
Because 2000 would also have increased with the same percentage p.
means, 2000 + 2000(p/100) = 2400
or p = (400* 100)/2000 = 20%.

Consider KUDOS if u find this helpful to u .Thanks
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor V
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9876
Location: Pune, India
Re: jason's salary & karen's salary  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Since question asks for the comparison between 1995 and 1998 salaries, a quick look at the statements will tell you that neither alone is sufficient. Now the question remains whether together they are sufficient. Let's analyze.

In 1995:
J salary - J;
K salary - J + 2000

In 1998: (Their salaries are now p% greater)
J salary- J + p% of J;
K salary- (J + 2000) + p% of (J + 2000)= J + p% of J + 2000 + p% of 2000

Compare the salaries in red. According to second statement, their difference is 2440.
So we can say p% of 2000 = 440. On solving, we get p = 22
_________________
Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Senior Manager  Joined: 24 Mar 2011
Posts: 290
Location: Texas

### Show Tags

1
udaymathapati wrote:
Attachment:
M-Q29.JPG

Note that both of their salary increase by same p percent. In 1995 let jason's and karen's salary be j and k resp. And in 1998, let that be j1 and k1.
j1 = pj
k1 = pk

St 1 --> in 1995, k = j+2000
Not sufficient doesn't provide any info about 1998 year.

St 2--> in 1998, k1 = j1+2440
Not sufficient doesn't provide any info about 1995 year.

Both together, solve the equations -
k1 = pk
j1+2440 = p(j+2000)
j1+2440 = j1+p2000 --> p = 12.2

Retired Moderator B
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1230
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Re: jason's salary & karen's salary  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

J = (1+p/100)j

K = (1+p/100)k

(1)

k = j + 2000

Not sufficient

(2)

K = J + 2440

Not Sufficient

(1) + (2)

J/K = j/k

1 - 2440/K = 1 - 2000/k

=> K/k = 2440/2000

Substituting this in above equation 2440/2000 = (1 + p)/100

_________________
Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings
Manager  Joined: 26 Feb 2013
Posts: 51
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V30 WE: Consulting (Telecommunications)
Re: Percents : Jason's salary and karen's salary were P %  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

In 1995 Jason's salary J. In 1998 it would be (1+p/100)*J
In 1995 Karen's salary K. In 1998 it would be (1+p/100)*K
Stmt 1 :
K= J+2000 in 1995. We dont know about either of their salaries in 1998. Hence insufficient

Stmt 2:
(1+p/100)K=(1+p/100)J + 2440. We dont know the values of J and K . Hence insufficient.

combining. let (1+p/100)= a .
a*(j+2000) = a*J +2440.

and we can solve for a or (1+p/100) and we can find the value of P.

Hope its clear.
Intern  Joined: 11 Sep 2012
Posts: 7
Re: Janson's salary and Karen's salary were each p percent  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

In DS questions you can simply test whether you can find a percentage change from a percent change in differing values by picking values.

Say: A = 200
B = 100
Difference is 100.

Increase values by 10%:

A = 220
B = 110
Difference: 110. 110 is a 10% increase from the original difference, so this will also hold for the original values in the question stem.

C
Intern  Joined: 19 Jan 2014
Posts: 24
Re: Janson's salary and Karen's salary were each p percent  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

tarek99 wrote:
Janson's salary and Karen's salary were each p percent greater in 1998 than in 1995. What is the value of p?

(1) In 1995 Karen's salary was $2,000 greater than Jason's. (2) In 1998 Karen's salary was$2,440 greater than Jason's.

Here's how I did it.

(1) 95 increased by p 98

Jason S
Karen (S+2000)

Not sufficient

(2) 95 increased by p 98

Jason Y
Karen Y+ 2 400

Not Suffictient.

So combining:

(S+2000)xP/100-2440=SP/100
2000P/100=2440
20P=2440
P=2440/20
P=122
22% increase
Target Test Prep Representative G
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Joined: 04 Mar 2011
Posts: 2809
Re: Janson's salary and Karen's salary were each p percent  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

1
tarek99 wrote:
Janson's salary and Karen's salary were each p percent greater in 1998 than in 1995. What is the value of p?

(1) In 1995 Karen's salary was $2,000 greater than Jason's. (2) In 1998 Karen's salary was$2,440 greater than Jason's.

We are given that Janson's salary and Karen's salary were each p percent greater in 1998 than in 1995, and we need to determine the value of p.

We can let J = Janson's salary in 1995 and K = Karen's salary in 1995. Therefore, (1 + p/100)J is Jason’s salary in 1998 and (1 + p/100)K is Karen’s salary in 1998.

Statement One Alone:

In 1995 Karen's salary was $2,000 greater than Janson's. This means K = J + 2000. However, that is not enough information to determine the value of p. Statement one alone is not sufficient. We can eliminate answer choices A and D. Statement Two Alone: In 1998 Karen's salary was$2,440 greater than Janson's.

Using the information in statement two, we can create the following equation:

(1 + p/100)K = (1 + p/100)J + 2440

However, this is still not enough information to determine p. Statement two alone is not sufficient. We can eliminate answer choice B.

Statements One and Two Together:

From the two statements, we have the following:

K = J + 2000

(1 + p/100)K = (1 + p/100)J + 2440

Let’s simplify the second equation:

We can start by dividing both sides by (1 + p/100) and obtain:

K = J + 2440/(1 + p/100)

K – J = 2440/(1 + p/100)

From our first equation, we know that K – J = 2,000. Thus, we can substitute 2,000 for K – J in our second equation and we have:

2000 = 2440/[(1 + p/100)]

Since we know that we can determine p, we can stop here. The two statements together are sufficient.

_________________

# Jeffrey Miller

Jeff@TargetTestPrep.com

See why Target Test Prep is the top rated GMAT quant course on GMAT Club. Read Our Reviews

If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Kudos" button.

GMAT Club Legend  V
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Posts: 4157
Re: Janson's salary and Karen's salary were each p percent  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

1
Top Contributor
tarek99 wrote:
Janson's salary and Karen's salary were each p percent greater in 1998 than in 1995. What is the value of p?

(1) In 1995 Karen's salary was $2,000 greater than Jason's. (2) In 1998 Karen's salary was$2,440 greater than Jason's.

Target question: What is the value of p?

Given: Jason's salary and Karen's salary were each p percent greater in 1998 than in 1995.
IMPORTANT: If my 1998 salary is p percent greater than my 1995 salary, then: 1998 salary = (1 + p/100)(1995 salary)
For example, if my 1998 salary is 7 percent greater than my 1995 salary, then: 1998 salary = (1 + 7/100)(1995 salary) = 1.07(1995 salary)

Let K = Karen's salary in 1995
Let J = Jason's salary in 1995
So, (1 + p/100)K = Karen's salary in 1998
And (1 + p/100)J = Jason's salary in 1998

Statement 1: In 1995 Karen's salary was $2,000 greater than Jason's So, we get K - J = 2000 So there's no information about p, so we can't determine the value of p Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT Statement 2: In 1998 Karen's salary was$2,440 greater than Jason's
We get: (1 + p/100)K - (1 + p/100)J = 2400
NOTICE that we can rewrite this as: (1 + p/100)(K - J) = 2400
Since we cannot solve this equation for p, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
From statement 1, we concluded that K - J = 2000
From statement 2, we concluded that (1 + p/100)(K - J) = 2400

Now take the second equation and replace (K - J) with 2000 to get: (1 + p/100)(2000) = 2400
At this point, we need only recognize that we COULD solve this equation for p, but we're not going to, since this would waste valuable time on the time-sensitive GMAT.
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT

Cheers,
Brent
_________________
Manager  G
Joined: 21 May 2017
Posts: 98
Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31 Janson's salary and Karen's salary were each p percent  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Janson's salary and Karen's salary were each p percent greater in 1998 than in 1995. What is the value of p?

(1) In 1995 Karen's salary was $2,000 greater than Jason's. clearly NS (2) In 1998 Karen's salary was$2,440 greater than Jason's. clearly NS

1+2

From statement 1, K - J = 2000
From statement 2, (1 + p/100)(K - J) = 2440
SO (1+p/100)2000=2440 can be solved for P Janson's salary and Karen's salary were each p percent   [#permalink] 13 Jul 2019, 04:48

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 21 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Janson's salary and Karen's salary were each p percent  