Aug 20 08:00 PM PDT  09:00 PM PDT EMPOWERgmat is giving away the complete Official GMAT Exam Pack collection worth $100 with the 3 Month Pack ($299) Aug 20 09:00 PM PDT  10:00 PM PDT Take 20% off the plan of your choice, now through midnight on Tuesday, 8/20 Aug 22 09:00 PM PDT  10:00 PM PDT What you'll gain: Strategies and techniques for approaching featured GMAT topics, and much more. Thursday, August 22nd at 9 PM EDT Aug 24 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Learn reading strategies that can help even nonvoracious reader to master GMAT RC Aug 25 09:00 AM PDT  12:00 PM PDT Join a FREE 1day verbal workshop and learn how to ace the Verbal section with the best tips and strategies. Limited for the first 99 registrants. Register today! Aug 25 08:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Exclusive offer! Get 400+ Practice Questions, 25 Video lessons and 6+ Webinars for FREE.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 193

K is a set of integers such that if the integer r is in K,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 04 Aug 2012, 03:39
Question Stats:
65% (00:41) correct 35% (00:59) wrong based on 621 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
K is a set of integers such that if the integer r is in K, then r + 1 is also in K. Is 100 in K? (1) 50 is in K. (2) 150 is in K.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________
Trying hard to achieve something unachievable now....
Originally posted by dkverma on 17 Oct 2010, 06:30.
Last edited by Bunuel on 04 Aug 2012, 03:39, edited 1 time in total.
OA added.




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 57082

K is a set of integers such that if the integer r is in K,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Oct 2010, 06:40
dkverma wrote: K is a set of integers such that if the integer r is in K, then r + 1 is also in K. Is 100 in K? (1) 50 is in K. (2) 150 is in K. (1) 50 is in K > integers more than or equal to 50 are in the set K, so 100 is in the K. Sufficient. (2) 150 is in K > integers more than or equal to 150 are in the set K, so 100 may or may not be in the K (if the source integer is 100 or less then 100 is in K but if the source integer is more than 100 then 100 is not in K). Not sufficient. Answer: A. Similar questions: https://gmatclub.com/forum/kisaseto ... 96907.htmlhttp://gmatclub.com/forum/foracertain ... 36580.htmlhttp://gmatclub.com/forum/ifpisaset ... 96630.htmlhttp://gmatclub.com/forum/kisasetof ... 03005.htmlHope it helps.
_________________




Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 755
Location: London

Re: Set of Integers
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Oct 2010, 15:24
muditadixit81 wrote: questions such as the one above never mention the total number of terms in the set , wouldnt that matter , say if the set were to contain only 10 integers or say 50 , the answer to the question might change ....? Not really, because the way the set is defined, it will always be either the empty set or an infinite set. If the set contains any integer, it will have to contain all the integers greater than or equal to that integer. So the question of having exactly 50 or 100 integers never arises
_________________




Intern
Joined: 28 Sep 2010
Posts: 4

Re: Set of Integers
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Oct 2010, 07:14
questions such as the one above never mention the total number of terms in the set , wouldnt that matter , say if the set were to contain only 10 integers or say 50 , the answer to the question might change ....?



BSchool Thread Master
Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Posts: 324

Re: Set of Integers
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Oct 2010, 23:18
shrouded1 wrote: muditadixit81 wrote: questions such as the one above never mention the total number of terms in the set , wouldnt that matter , say if the set were to contain only 10 integers or say 50 , the answer to the question might change ....? Not really, because the way the set is defined, it will always be either the empty set or an infinite set. If the set contains any integer, it will have to contain all the integers greater than or equal to that integer. So the question of having exactly 50 or 100 integers never arises Well, that is some valuable information. Thank you and +1.



Intern
Status: Work hard, Play harder!
Joined: 10 Apr 2010
Posts: 15
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Schools: INSEAD, LBS, RSM

Re: Set of Integers
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Oct 2010, 23:54
Guys, would you mind explaining the solution bit more. How can 100 be in set, if 50 is in K. Wouldn't r+1, i.e., 51 should be there? Thanks!



Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 755
Location: London

Re: Set of Integers
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Oct 2010, 00:19
vibhutirs wrote: Guys, would you mind explaining the solution bit more. How can 100 be in set, if 50 is in K. Wouldn't r+1, i.e., 51 should be there? Thanks! If r is in the set, r+1 will be in it. So if 50 is in the set, 51 will be in it If 51 is in the set, by the same logic, 52 will be in it If 52 is in the set, 53 will be in it .... AND SO ON So basically what the condition implies is if r is in the set, all the integers greater than r will also have to be in the set. Hence, 50 being in there is sufficient for 100 to be in there. But 150 being in there, is not necessarily sufficient
_________________



Intern
Joined: 02 Nov 2009
Posts: 34
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT Date: 04212013
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Internet and New Media)

Re: please explain
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Oct 2012, 02:55
From 1 If 50 is in a part of K then 51 is a part of k and if 51 is a part of k then 52 is also a part of k so the possible values of k are k>=50 From 2 k>=150 so from 1 we can say that 100 is a part of k but from 2 we are not sure if it is contains 100 or not... Ans: A)
_________________



Intern
Joined: 02 Jul 2013
Posts: 20
Concentration: Technology, Other
GMAT Date: 01172014
GPA: 3.84

Re: K is a set of integers such that if the integer r is in K,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Nov 2013, 06:31
Bunuel, Hi I understood your explanation.However , I think if you were to classify statement 2 as insufficient then statement 1 would also be if 50 is in set the 51,is also in the ,same as 52...... all the way to a hundred. if 150 is in set then 149 must have been part of the set, 148 .. all the way to possibly 0. But following your explanation you mentioned in statement two that there is no way of knowing if 100 was part of the set? Well i agree with you but how are we to know if statement 1 goes all the way to 100? I was thinking that E would have been the answer.no?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 57082

Re: K is a set of integers such that if the integer r is in K,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Nov 2013, 08:24
mumbijoh wrote: Bunuel, Hi I understood your explanation.However , I think if you were to classify statement 2 as insufficient then statement 1 would also be if 50 is in set the 51,is also in the ,same as 52...... all the way to a hundred. if 150 is in set then 149 must have been part of the set, 148 .. all the way to possibly 0. But following your explanation you mentioned in statement two that there is no way of knowing if 100 was part of the set? Well i agree with you but how are we to know if statement 1 goes all the way to 100? I was thinking that E would have been the answer.no? We know that if r is in K, then r + 1 is also in K. (1) says that 50 is in K, thus every integer more than 50 is also in K: 51 because 50 is there, 52 because 51 is there, ..., 100 because 99 is there. Similar questions to practice: foracertainsetofnumbersifxisinthesetthenboth161920.htmlforacertainsetofnumbersifxisinthesetthenx136580.htmlasetofnumbershasthepropertythatforanynumbertint98829.htmlifpisasetofintegersand3isinpiseverypositive96630.htmlkisasetofnumberssuchthatiifxisinkthenx96907.htmlHope this helps.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 12 Mar 2011
Posts: 15

Re: K is a set of integers such that if the integer r is in K,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Nov 2013, 11:50
Bunuel wrote: mumbijoh wrote: Bunuel, Hi I understood your explanation.However , I think if you were to classify statement 2 as insufficient then statement 1 would also be if 50 is in set the 51,is also in the ,same as 52...... all the way to a hundred. if 150 is in set then 149 must have been part of the set, 148 .. all the way to possibly 0. But following your explanation you mentioned in statement two that there is no way of knowing if 100 was part of the set? Well i agree with you but how are we to know if statement 1 goes all the way to 100? I was thinking that E would have been the answer.no? We know that if r is in K, then r + 1 is also in K. (1) says that 50 is in K, thus every integer more than 50 is also in K: 51 because 50 is there, 52 because 51 is there, ..., 100 because 99 is there. Similar questions to practice: foracertainsetofnumbersifxisinthesetthenboth161920.htmlforacertainsetofnumbersifxisinthesetthenx136580.htmlasetofnumbershasthepropertythatforanynumbertint98829.htmlifpisasetofintegersand3isinpiseverypositive96630.htmlkisasetofnumberssuchthatiifxisinkthenx96907.htmlHope this helps. Hi Bunuel, Can you explain again why B is insufficient? If 150 is in K, 151, .152... resulting from ( r + 1) also is in K. That means 100 will be out of K because K includes only value > 150. B helps to always answer: NO (100 is always NOT in K: Sufficient). Thanks.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 57082

Re: K is a set of integers such that if the integer r is in K,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Nov 2013, 11:58
yenpham9 wrote: Bunuel wrote: mumbijoh wrote: Bunuel, Hi I understood your explanation.However , I think if you were to classify statement 2 as insufficient then statement 1 would also be if 50 is in set the 51,is also in the ,same as 52...... all the way to a hundred. if 150 is in set then 149 must have been part of the set, 148 .. all the way to possibly 0. But following your explanation you mentioned in statement two that there is no way of knowing if 100 was part of the set? Well i agree with you but how are we to know if statement 1 goes all the way to 100? I was thinking that E would have been the answer.no? We know that if r is in K, then r + 1 is also in K. (1) says that 50 is in K, thus every integer more than 50 is also in K: 51 because 50 is there, 52 because 51 is there, ..., 100 because 99 is there. Similar questions to practice: foracertainsetofnumbersifxisinthesetthenboth161920.htmlforacertainsetofnumbersifxisinthesetthenx136580.htmlasetofnumbershasthepropertythatforanynumbertint98829.htmlifpisasetofintegersand3isinpiseverypositive96630.htmlkisasetofnumberssuchthatiifxisinkthenx96907.htmlHope this helps. Hi Bunuel, Can you explain again why B is insufficient? If 150 is in K, 151, .152... resulting from ( r + 1) also is in K. That means 100 will be out of K because K includes only value > 150. B helps to always answer: NO (100 is always NOT in K: Sufficient). Thanks. I guess you did not follow the links provided... We don't know which is the source integer in the set, if it's 150, then 100 won't be in the set but if the source integer is say 10 or 20 (basically if the source integer is less than or equal to 100), then 100 will be in the set. So, 100 may or may not be in the set. Consider below two examples of the set: {150, 151, 152, ...} {1, 2, 3, 4, ..., 100, ..., 150, ...} Notice that both sets satisfy the second statement. Hope it's clear.
_________________



Manager
Joined: 18 May 2014
Posts: 57
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Other
GMAT Date: 07312014
GPA: 3.99
WE: Analyst (Consulting)

Re: K is a set of integers such that if the integer r is in K,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 May 2014, 10:49
If r is in K, r+1 is in K. So if 50 is in K, 51 is in K. But if 51 is in K, so is 52, and then so is 53, and so on. Indeed, if you know 50 is in K, you know that every positive integer larger than 50 must also be in K. So 1) is sufficient.
If 150 is in K, all we know for certain is that every positive integer greater than or equal to 150 must be in K. We don't know if 100 is in K. So 2) is insufficient.
Thus, A.



NonHuman User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 12035

Re: K is a set of integers such that if the integer r is in K,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 May 2018, 02:20
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________




Re: K is a set of integers such that if the integer r is in K,
[#permalink]
04 May 2018, 02:20






