Author 
Message 
Intern
Joined: 15 Jun 2008
Posts: 3

m01  Q 20 [#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Sep 2008, 03:19
1
This post was BOOKMARKED
If Jim saved a total of $90 in 3 weeks, how much did he save in week 2? (1) Jim's average savings for the first 2 weeks were $20 (2) Jim's first week's savings were half of his savings in week 2 and a third of his savings in week 3 Source: GMAT Club Tests  hardest GMAT questions Answer explaination : Let's suppose , S1 , S2 and S3 are the amounts Jim saved for the first, second, and third week correspondingly. From statement (1) we have that S1 + S2 = 120, but the question says that S1 + S2 + S3 = 180, so S3 = 40; he lost $40 during the third week. From the statement (2) we can construct system of equations: S1 + S2 + S3 = 80 2S1  S2 = 0 3S1  S3 = 0 How was above two equations written using the statement ?Subtracting second equation from the third gives us Solving it gives the value of . The answer is B.



VP
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1260

Re: m01  Q 20 explaination not clear pls put some light [#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Sep 2008, 04:09
1
This post received KUDOS
Frm (2) let the savings for three weeks be x, 2x, 3x Then x+2x+3x= total savings=80 x can be found hence saving for second week can also be found Ans: B



Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2008
Posts: 99

Re: m01  Q 20 explaination not clear pls put some light [#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Sep 2008, 10:35
I believe the first statement is meaningles. IMO saving must be positive whereas just like he mentioned it comes out to be negative ? Should be corrected.



Manager
Joined: 14 May 2008
Posts: 57
Schools: Wharton (WEMBA East)

Re: m01  Q 20 explaination not clear pls put some light [#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Oct 2008, 14:40
2
This post received KUDOS
The answer and explanation are correct, I solved it via S2, same as ritula, sum of the parts, x = 13 1/3, 2x = 26 2/3.
But S1 then contradicts S2. As I understand it, that's not supposed to be possible on a DS question. S1 can be insufficient, but it can't be wrong. In this case it's wrong.
If S1 stated that the average for the first 2 weeks was $20, this would be reconciled (and the answer stays the same).



CIO
Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 1218

Re: m01  Q 20 explaination not clear pls put some light [#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Oct 2008, 06:51
Thanks, we'll edit the question. It indeed has a typo. +1 scorcho wrote: The answer and explanation are correct, I solved it via S2, same as ritula, sum of the parts, x = 13 1/3, 2x = 26 2/3.
But S1 then contradicts S2. As I understand it, that's not supposed to be possible on a DS question. S1 can be insufficient, but it can't be wrong. In this case it's wrong.
If S1 stated that the average for the first 2 weeks was $20, this would be reconciled (and the answer stays the same).
_________________
Welcome to GMAT Club! Want to solve GMAT questions on the go? GMAT Club iPhone app will help. Please read this before posting in GMAT Club Tests forum Result correlation between real GMAT and GMAT Club Tests Are GMAT Club Test sets ordered in any way? Take 15 free tests with questions from GMAT Club, Knewton, Manhattan GMAT, and Veritas.
GMAT Club Premium Membership  big benefits and savings



Director
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 734

Re: m01  Q 20 explaination not clear pls put some light [#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Oct 2008, 07:25
OK. may be I misinterpreted statement 2.
I concluded
S1 = 1/2 S2 + 1/3 S3 so I chose answer 5.
But in the answer explanation,
2S1  S2 =0 3S1  S3 = 0
In Statement 2, it used 'And' not 'Or' right? can you guys explain me understanding this?
Thanks.



SVP
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2473

Re: m01  Q 20 explaination not clear pls put some light [#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Oct 2008, 09:36
dzyubam wrote: Thanks, we'll edit the question. It indeed has a typo. +1 scorcho wrote: The answer and explanation are correct, I solved it via S2, same as ritula, sum of the parts, x = 13 1/3, 2x = 26 2/3.
But S1 then contradicts S2. As I understand it, that's not supposed to be possible on a DS question. S1 can be insufficient, but it can't be wrong. In this case it's wrong.
If S1 stated that the average for the first 2 weeks was $20, this would be reconciled (and the answer stays the same). Yeah, thats necessary to make the question worthful. Thanks.
_________________
Verbal: http://gmatclub.com/forum/newtotheverbalforumpleasereadthisfirst77546.html Math: http://gmatclub.com/forum/newtothemathforumpleasereadthisfirst77764.html Gmat: http://gmatclub.com/forum/everythingyouneedtoprepareforthegmatrevised77983.html
GT



Director
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 734

Re: m01  Q 20 explaination not clear pls put some light [#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Oct 2008, 10:45
GMATTIGER,
can you explain a bit more? are you saying that is correct(usning 'and' in statement 2 instead of an 'or') or wrong?
any help would be appreciated.
Thanks.



SVP
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2473

Re: m01  Q 20 explaination not clear pls put some light [#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Nov 2008, 12:14
ugimba wrote: GMATTIGER, can you explain a bit more? are you saying that is correct(usning 'and' in statement 2 instead of an 'or') or wrong? any help would be appreciated. Thanks. According to the question: From statement 1: (w1 + w2)/2 = 60 w1 + w2 = 120 Since the question says that saving in 3 weeks is 80, how is it possible to 120 savings in 2 weeks. Ok, The question might assume that there is a negative savings of $40 in w3. Ok agreed. From statement 2: w1 = w2/2 = w3/3 so w2 = 2w1 and w3 = 3w1 w1 + w2 + w3 = 80 Since w1+w2+w3 = 80, and w1+w2 = 120, it cannot be true that w3 = 3w1 because w3 saving is ve and w1 is +ve.. Therefore the assumptions are self contradictory. However, I am sure " dzyubam" might have already changed the question as required. Quote: Jim has saved $80 in 3 weeks. How much did he save in Week 2?
1. Average savings for the first 2 weeks are $60 2. First week savings are half of what he saved in week 2 and a third of what he saved in week 3
_________________
Verbal: http://gmatclub.com/forum/newtotheverbalforumpleasereadthisfirst77546.html Math: http://gmatclub.com/forum/newtothemathforumpleasereadthisfirst77764.html Gmat: http://gmatclub.com/forum/everythingyouneedtoprepareforthegmatrevised77983.html
GT



Intern
Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 46
Schools: Marshall '11

Re: M1  22 [#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Feb 2009, 22:56
the next # after 324,700 to have tens digit 2 and units digit 1 is 324721, the one after that is: 324821, 324921, etc. So we see here that # w/tens digit 2 and units digit 1 comes every 100 #s. So to get the answer, we find out how many 100 #s are there btw 458,600 and 324,700: (458,600324,700)/100=1338, 1338+1=1339 to be inclusive. So the answer is A: 1339



SVP
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1800
Location: New York

Re: M1  22 [#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Feb 2009, 12:08
wcgmatclub wrote: the next # after 324,700 to have tens digit 2 and units digit 1 is 324721, the one after that is: 324821, 324921, etc. So we see here that # w/tens digit 2 and units digit 1 comes every 100 #s. So to get the answer, we find out how many 100 #s are there btw 458,600 and 324,700: (458,600324,700)/100=1338, 1338+1=1339 to be inclusive. So the answer is A: 1339 small correction.. ](458,600324,700)/100=1339 that's the answer.. why are you adding 1
_________________
Your attitude determines your altitude Smiling wins more friends than frowning



Intern
Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Posts: 14
Location: India

Re: m01  Q 20 explaination not clear pls put some light [#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Jul 2011, 07:56
itiskavikatha wrote: If Jim saved a total of $90 in 3 weeks, how much did he save in week 2? 1. Jim's average savings for the first 2 weeks were $20 2. Jim's first week's savings were half of his savings in week 2 and a third of his savings in week 3 Source: GMAT Club Tests  hardest GMAT questions 1) offcourse is not sufficient to solve 2) S1+S2+S3 = 90 S1 = 1/2S2 S3 = 3S1 = 3/2(S2) S2(1+1/2+3/2) = 90 S2 = 180/6 = 30 hence B



Intern
Status: UF BSBA '15  Preparing for the future
Joined: 09 May 2011
Posts: 25
Location: United States
GPA: 3.87
WE: Human Resources (Consulting)

Re: m01  Q 20 explaination not clear pls put some light [#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Jul 2011, 12:02
Here is something I do not understand.
According to statement one, the average savings for the first two weeks were $20. I assumed that meant after two weeks he had $40.
Where are people getting $120 from?



Intern
Joined: 04 Jun 2012
Posts: 8
GMAT Date: 09162013

Re: m01  Q 20 explaination not clear pls put some light [#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Jul 2012, 05:26
1
This post received KUDOS
Here's my logic to this question:
1) He could have saved $10 in week 1 and $30 in week 2 and you get an average of $20 OR he could have saved $20 in both week 1 and 2 and that gives you an average of $20. Clearly Not sufficient
2) You get only one value for this. Week 2= $30... Week 1= $15.... Week 3= $45 All 3 weeks equal $90. Try to plug in other values and it doesn't work.
Answer B



Intern
Joined: 19 Jul 2012
Posts: 2
GPA: 3.65

Re: m01  Q 20 [#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jul 2012, 15:38
1) First statement only give the average of the first two weeks. May be there was no income in the first or second week. Incomplete information.
2) you can create a equation to solve with this information 1/2x + x + 3(1/2x) = 90 (You don't have to solve, just create an equation to establish relationship)
Ans : B ( 2nd statement is sufficient to ans., but not 1st)



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 40324

Re: m01  Q 20 [#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Jul 2012, 05:18
itiskavikatha wrote: If Jim saved a total of $90 in 3 weeks, how much did he save in week 2?
(1) Jim's average savings for the first 2 weeks were $20 (2) Jim's first week's savings were half of his savings in week 2 and a third of his savings in week 3 Note that: on the GMAT, two data sufficiency statements always provide TRUE information and these statements never contradict each other. But for this question, from the first statement we get that the total savings for the first 2 weeks were $40 and from the second statement we get that the total savings for the first 2 weeks were $15+$30=$45, so the statements clearly contradict each other. Revised question reads: If Jim saved a total of $90 in 3 weeks, how much did he save in week 2?Say \(S_1\), \(S_2\), and \(S_3\) are the amounts Jim saved for the first, second, and third week, respectively. (1) Jim's average savings for the first 2 weeks were $22.5. Given: \(S_1+S_2=2*22.5=45\), not sufficient to get the value of \(S_2\). (2) Jim's first week's savings were half of his savings in week 2 and a third of his savings in week 3. Given: \(2*S_1=S_2\) and \(3*S_1=S_3\). Since, also given that \(S_1+S_2+S_3=90\), then \(S_1+2*S_1+3*S_1=90\), which gives \(S_1=15\). Therefore \(S_2=2*S_1=30\). Sufficient.. Answer: B. Hope it's clear.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Intern
Joined: 16 Mar 2012
Posts: 1

Re: m01  Q 20 [#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Aug 2012, 00:07
B is right guys??!!!



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 40324

Re: m01  Q 20 [#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Aug 2012, 00:48











