It is currently 19 Nov 2017, 07:55

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the

Author Message
VP
Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 1480

Kudos [?]: 426 [0], given: 0

Location: Germany
Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Feb 2005, 00:50
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the effect that certain policies should be determined not by the legislature itself but by public referenda in which every voter can take part. Critics of the proposals argue that the outcomes of public referenda would be biased, since wealthy special-interest groups are able to influence votersâ€™ views by means of television advertisements.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the criticsâ€™ argument?
(A) Many state legislators regard public referenda as a way of avoiding voting on issues on which their constituents are divided.
(B) During elections for members of the legislature, the number of people who vote is unaffected by whether the candidates run television advertisements or not.
(C) Proponents of policies that are opposed by wealthy special-interest groups are often unable to afford advertising time on local television stations.
(D) Different special-interest groups often take opposing positions on questions of which policies the state should adopt.
(E) Television stations are reluctant to become associated with any one political opinion, for fear of losing viewers who do not share that

Kudos [?]: 426 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA

### Show Tags

15 Feb 2005, 05:52
if the answer is (C) I will explain.

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1205

Kudos [?]: 844 [0], given: 0

Location: Taiwan

### Show Tags

15 Feb 2005, 06:06
christoph wrote:
Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the effect that certain policies should be determined not by the legislature itself but by public referenda in which every voter can take part. Critics of the proposals argue that the outcomes of public referenda would be biased, since wealthy special-interest groups are able to influence votersâ€™ views by means of television advertisements.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the criticsâ€™ argument?

(A) Many state legislators regard public referenda as a way of avoiding voting on issues on which their constituents are divided.
(B) During elections for members of the legislature, the number of people who vote is unaffected by whether the candidates run television advertisements or not.
(C) Proponents of policies that are opposed by wealthy special-interest groups are often unable to afford advertising time on local television stations.
(D) Different special-interest groups often take opposing positions on questions of which policies the state should adopt.
(E) Television stations are reluctant to become associated with any one political opinion, for fear of losing viewers who do not share that

Conclusion: Critics of the proposals argue that the outcomes of public referenda would be biased.

Assumption: since wealthy special-interest groups are able to influence votersâ€™ views by means of television advertisements.

choice C is the counterpart of the assumption.

therefore, C is the best.

Kudos [?]: 844 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5032

Kudos [?]: 453 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

### Show Tags

15 Feb 2005, 22:36
(C) clearly states that wealthy special interest groups can influence the outcome of the vote as they can afford to pay for the tv ads

Kudos [?]: 453 [0], given: 0

15 Feb 2005, 22:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.