It is currently 21 Nov 2017, 05:24

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Posts: 448

Kudos [?]: 302 [1], given: 6

Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Sep 2008, 09:08
1
KUDOS
15
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

57% (00:49) correct 43% (00:47) wrong based on 755 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water bikes from the tranquil waters of Puget Sound, a judge overturned the ban on the ground of violating state laws for allowing the use of personal watercraft on common waterways.

A. of violating state laws for allowing
B. of their violating state laws to allow
C. that it violates state laws that allowed
D. that it violated state laws allowing
E. that state laws were being violated allowing
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by reto on 22 Sep 2015, 13:19, edited 1 time in total.
format and style, & source

Kudos [?]: 302 [1], given: 6

VP
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1402

Kudos [?]: 443 [0], given: 1

Re: Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Sep 2008, 10:47
Nihit wrote:
. Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water bikes from the tranquil waters of Puget Sound, a judge overturned the ban on the ground of violating state laws for allowing the use of personal watercraft on common waterways.
A. of violating state laws for allowing
B. of their violating state laws to allow
C. that it violates state laws that allowed
D. that it violated state laws allowing
E. that state laws were being violated allowing

A changes the meaning as if state laws were do not allow the use of personal WC

D is correct. C is wrong for allowed. allow might have been a different issue.

Kudos [?]: 443 [0], given: 1

Director
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 634

Kudos [?]: 648 [1], given: 6

Re: Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Sep 2008, 14:51
1
KUDOS
IMO B.

A. of violating state laws for allowing -Judge overturned to allow ....
B. of their violating state laws to allow - refers to 'jet skis and other water bikes '
Judge overturned to allow ....
C. that it violates state laws that allowed - it is wrong pronoun, 'ban' can not violate law
D. that it violated state laws allowing - - it is wrong pronoun, 'ban' can not violate law
E. that state laws were being violated allowing - 'BEING'
_________________

If You're Not Living On The Edge, You're Taking Up Too Much Space

Kudos [?]: 648 [1], given: 6

SVP
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2471

Kudos [?]: 856 [0], given: 19

Re: Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Sep 2008, 22:32
Nihit wrote:
. Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water bikes from the tranquil waters of Puget Sound, a judge overturned the ban on the ground of violating state laws for allowing the use of personal watercraft on common waterways.

A. of violating state laws for allowing
B. of their violating state laws to allow
C. that it violates state laws that allowed
D. that it violated state laws allowing
E. that state laws were being violated allowing

Should be C. everything happend in the past so allowed should be ok. The logic for me is:

1. 9 moths ago the county banned jet skis and other water bikes from the tranquil waters of Puget Sound.
2. A judge overturned the ban by the country imposed on jet skis and other water bikes from the tranquil waters of Puget Sound.
3. The ban violated the state laws that allwoed the use of personal watercraft on common waterways.

A. ground of.......?
B. their? whose? do not know.
C. on the grounds that + a clause => should be ok.
D. "that it violated state laws allowing"? the county was not allowing anything.
E. passive.
_________________

Gmat: http://gmatclub.com/forum/everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html

GT

Kudos [?]: 856 [0], given: 19

Intern
Joined: 15 Apr 2008
Posts: 38

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Re: Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2008, 01:31
IMO it should be D.

The ban violated the laws in the time it was in force, the laws are something fixed.

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 23 Apr 2008
Posts: 85

Kudos [?]: 8 [1], given: 0

Re: Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2008, 01:50
1
KUDOS
Nihit wrote:
. Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water bikes from the tranquil waters of Puget Sound, a judge overturned the ban on the ground of violating state laws for allowing the use of personal watercraft on common waterways.
A. of violating state laws for allowing
B. of their violating state laws to allow
C. that it violates state laws that allowed
D. that it violated state laws allowing
E. that state laws were being violated allowing

A & B are out because 'that' is preferred over 'of'
E-PASSIVE
C- 'VIOLATES',SHUD BE 'VIOLATED'

IMO D
OA?

Kudos [?]: 8 [1], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1534

Kudos [?]: 280 [0], given: 0

Re: Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2008, 02:26
icandy wrote:
Nihit wrote:
. Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water bikes from the tranquil waters of Puget Sound, a judge overturned the ban on the ground of violating state laws for allowing the use of personal watercraft on common waterways.
A. of violating state laws for allowing
B. of their violating state laws to allow
C. that it violates state laws that allowed
D. that it violated state laws allowing
E. that state laws were being violated allowing

A changes the meaning as if state laws were do not allow the use of personal WC
D is correct. C is wrong for allowed. allow might have been a different issue.

Sorry, but I did not get how it changes the meaning.

Kudos [?]: 280 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 582

Kudos [?]: 841 [0], given: 20

Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
Re: Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Jul 2010, 14:24
in option (E), the correct response, shouldn't there be a comma before "allowing"?
E. that state laws were being violated, allowing
that way, "allowing" implies an implication of the ban.

the ban violated...allowing...
_________________

KUDOS me if you feel my contribution has helped you.

Kudos [?]: 841 [0], given: 20

VP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1481

Kudos [?]: 1500 [0], given: 2

Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Re: Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2010, 09:28
so the idiom is on the grounds that? Is there any other possible construction? For example, on the grounds of?
Thanks
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1500 [0], given: 2

Manager
Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 185

Kudos [?]: 139 [0], given: 7

Re: Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2010, 12:05
grounds for is also a combination..
like I said, if you start basing your answers on idioms, you might end up eliminating at times a probable answer choice..

I can pretty much say that by my experience... goofed up 2 times.. trying to cut down there myself !
_________________

Gotta hit the 700 score this time... 3rd time lucky !
Give me some kudos... Like you, even I need them badly

Kudos [?]: 139 [0], given: 7

Moderator
Status: battlecruiser, operational...
Joined: 25 Apr 2010
Posts: 981

Kudos [?]: 172 [0], given: 71

Schools: Carey '16
Re: Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2010, 12:40
D. there's another thread just like this asking the same question. Not sure why it's considered a 700 lvl question. It's pretty simple?
_________________

Kudos [?]: 172 [0], given: 71

Retired Moderator
Status: I wish!
Joined: 21 May 2010
Posts: 784

Kudos [?]: 484 [0], given: 33

Re: Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Aug 2010, 23:36
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Nihit wrote:
. Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water bikes from the tranquil waters of Puget Sound, a judge overturned the ban on the ground of violating state laws for allowing the use of personal watercraft on common waterways.
A. of violating state laws for allowing
B. of their violating state laws to allow
C. that it violates state laws that allowed
D. that it violated state laws allowing
E. that state laws were being violated allowing

"Ground of" is a wrong idiom.

"of violating" and "for allowing" are wordy and awkward phrases. Keeping both in mind we can eliminate options A and B.

The pronoun "their" in option B is ambiguous because there's no logical plural noun for it to refer to, but "it" can logically refer to "the ban." The pronoun "it" isn't ambiguous here in option C and D; it refers to "the ban" unambiguously.

E is indeed wordy and distorts the meaning. C has a tense error ("violates"), so D is the only answer choice without a grammar error.
_________________

http://drambedkarbooks.com/

Kudos [?]: 484 [0], given: 33

VP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1471

Kudos [?]: 790 [0], given: 6

Re: Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Aug 2010, 08:27
D for me.

"grounds for" is the correct idiom.

"grounds of" is incorrect.

Kudos [?]: 790 [0], given: 6

VP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1481

Kudos [?]: 1500 [0], given: 2

Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Re: Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2010, 14:04
oa is D
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1500 [0], given: 2

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jan 2011
Posts: 339

Kudos [?]: 246 [0], given: 87

Re: Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jul 2011, 02:24
icandy wrote:
Nihit wrote:
. Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water bikes from the tranquil waters of Puget Sound, a judge overturned the ban on the ground of violating state laws for allowing the use of personal watercraft on common waterways.
A. of violating state laws for allowing
B. of their violating state laws to allow
C. that it violates state laws that allowed
D. that it violated state laws allowing
E. that state laws were being violated allowing

A changes the meaning as if state laws were do not allow the use of personal WC

D is correct. C is wrong for allowed. allow might have been a different issue.

How does A change the meaning??
WHy is allowed wrong in C?
Why is allowing right in D???

Kudos [?]: 246 [0], given: 87

Manager
Status: GMAT BATTLE - WIN OR DIE
Joined: 02 May 2011
Posts: 163

Kudos [?]: 114 [2], given: 13

Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GMAT Date: 12-22-2011
GPA: 3.81
WE: General Management (Hospitality and Tourism)
Re: Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jul 2011, 03:30
2
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
I would like to remined that we need find the best answer among og 5 answer choices.

C we eliminate because of use incorrect tanse "judge overturned" - past simple, so we have no reason to switch to present simple "it violates".

D correct use of tanse "judge overturned" and "it violated"

A and B incorrect use "ground of"

E "state laws were being" we have no reason to use "were being"

siddhans wrote:
icandy wrote:
Nihit wrote:
. Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water bikes from the tranquil waters of Puget Sound, a judge overturned the ban on the ground of violating state laws for allowing the use of personal watercraft on common waterways.
A. of violating state laws for allowing
B. of their violating state laws to allow
C. that it violates state laws that allowed
D. that it violated state laws allowing
E. that state laws were being violated allowing

A changes the meaning as if state laws were do not allow the use of personal WC

D is correct. C is wrong for allowed. allow might have been a different issue.

How does A change the meaning??
WHy is allowed wrong in C?
Why is allowing right in D???

Kudos [?]: 114 [2], given: 13

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jan 2011
Posts: 339

Kudos [?]: 246 [0], given: 87

Re: Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jul 2011, 03:40
WishMasterUA wrote:
I would like to remined that we need find the best answer among og 5 answer choices.

C we eliminate because of use incorrect tanse "judge overturned" - past simple, so we have no reason to switch to present simple "it violates".

D correct use of tanse "judge overturned" and "it violated"

A and B incorrect use "ground of"

E "state laws were being" we have no reason to use "were being"

siddhans wrote:
icandy wrote:

A changes the meaning as if state laws were do not allow the use of personal WC

D is correct. C is wrong for allowed. allow might have been a different issue.

How does A change the meaning??
WHy is allowed wrong in C?
Why is allowing right in D???

what about allowing in d...its not parallel to violated

Kudos [?]: 246 [0], given: 87

Manager
Status: Sick of Refreshing Email
Joined: 10 Mar 2011
Posts: 97

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 3

Location: United States (TX)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
GMAT 2: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q50 V39
GPA: 3.6
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Aug 2011, 21:17
Even I picked C because I missed violates and violated -

Lets say you are reporting this news (at that moment the ban is already overturned)
- Judge overturned the ban on the ground that it violated state laws allowing.....
- Judge overturned the ban on the ground that it violates state laws that allowed.....

So its not about allowed or allowing.

I hope it makes sense.
_________________

Thanks
Sumeet
http://www.midasreturns.wordpress.com

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 3

Manager
Status: Back to (GMAT) Times Square!!!
Joined: 15 Aug 2011
Posts: 179

Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 25

Location: United States (IL)
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2011, 03:54
We need 'allowing' in the end because of cause-effect situation, E has being, A - was judje violating anything?. Hence D.
_________________

Working towards a goal...
V.

Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 25

Manager
Joined: 05 Mar 2011
Posts: 145

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 3

Re: Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Nov 2011, 22:04
I got the answer but it took me way longer than 1 min and 30 seconds

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 3

Re: Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water   [#permalink] 28 Nov 2011, 22:04

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 29 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by