Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
After just 3 months of studying with the TTP GMAT Focus course, Conner scored an incredible 755 (Q89/V90/DI83) on the GMAT Focus. In this live interview, he shares how he achieved his outstanding 755 (100%) GMAT Focus score on test day.
In this conversation with Ankit Mehra, IESE MBA and CEO & Co-Founder, of GyanDhan, we will discuss how prospective MBA students can finance their MBA education with education loans and scholarships.
Grab 20% off any Target Test Prep GMAT Focus plan during our Flash Sale. Just enter the coupon code FLASH20 at checkout to save up to $320. The offer ends on Tuesday, April 30.
What do András from Hungary, Pablo from Mexico, Conner from the United States, Giorgio from Italy, Leo from Germany, and Rishab from India have in common? They all earned top scores on the GMAT Focus Edition using the Target Test Prep course!
What do András from Hungary, Conner from the United States, Giorgio from Italy, Leo from Germany, and Saahil from India have in common? They all earned top scores on the GMAT Focus Edition using the Target Test Prep course!
The impressionist painters expressly disavowed any interest in philosophy, yet their new approach to art had far-reaching philosophical implications. For the view of matter that the Impressionists assumed differed profoundly from the view that had previously prevailed among artists. This view helped to unify the artistic works created in the new style. The ancient Greeks had conceived of the world in concrete terms, even endowing abstract qualities with bodies. This Greek view of matter persisted, so far as painting was concerned, into the nineteenth century. The Impressionists, on the other hand, viewed light, not matter, as the ultimate visual reality. The philosopher Taine expressed the Impressionist view of things when he said, “The chief ‘person’ in a picture is the light in which everything is bathed.” In Impressionist painting, solid bodies became mere reflectors of light, and distinctions between one object and another became arbitrary conventions; for by light all things were welded together. The treatment of both color and outline was transformed as well. Color, formerly considered a property inherent in an object, was seen to be merely the result of vibrations of light on the object’s colorless surface. And outline, whose function had formerly been to indicate the limits of objects, now marked instead merely the boundary between units of pattern, which often merged into one another. The Impressionist world was composed not of separate objects but of many surfaces on which light struck and was reflected with varying intensity to the eye through the atmosphere, which modified it. It was this process that produced the mosaic of colors that formed an Impressionist canvas. “Light becomes the sole subject of the picture,” writes Mauclair. “The interest of the object upon which it plays is secondary. Painting thus conceived becomes a purely optic art.” From this profoundly revolutionary form of art, then, all ideas—religious, moral, psychological—were excluded, and so were all emotions except certain aesthetic ones. The people, places, and things depicted in an Impressionist picture do not tell story or convey any special meaning; they are, instead, merely parts of pattern of light drawn from nature and captured on canvas by the artist.
1. The author of the passage is primarily concerned with
(A) explaining how the Impressionists were influenced by scientific studies of light and color (B) discussing the philosophical implications of the Impressionist style of painting (C) identifying the revolutionary artistic techniques developed by the Impressionist painters (D) analyzing the influence of thinkers like Taine and Mauclair on Impressionist painting (E) defending the importance of the Impressionist painters in the history of modern art
2. According to the passage, the Impressionists differed from the ancient Greeks in that the Impressionists
(A) considered color to be property inherent in objects (B) placed a higher value on the narrative element in painting (C) depicted the objects in a painting as isolated, rather than united in a single pattern (D) treated light, rather than matter, as the ultimate reality (E) regarded art primarily as a medium for expressing moral and aesthetic ideas
3. The author’s quotation of a statement by Taine (lines 15-16) serves which of the following functions in the passage?
(A) It furnishes a specific example of an Impressionist painting that features light as its chief subject. (B) It resolves an apparent contradiction in the philosophy of the Impressionists. (C) It qualifies the statement that the ancient Greeks viewed the world in concrete terms. (D) It summarizes the unique perspective that the Impressionists brought to painting. (E) It provides a concrete illustration of the far-reaching philosophical implications of Impressionism.
4. According to the passage, the Impressionists believed that the atmosphere
(A) reflects light with varying intensity (B) creates the illusion of color in colorless surfaces (C) modifies the shapes of objects (D) is the result of vibrations of light (E) affects the way we perceived color
5. The author’s use of the term “mosaic of colors” (line 32) suggests that Impressionist paintings were characterized by
(A) discontinuous dabs of unmixed pigment (B) broad, sweeping brush strokes (C) clearly defined forms and objects (D) subjects devoid of emotive or literary qualities (E) the glowing reds, greens, and midnight blues of stained glass
6. The passage contains information that answers which of the following questions? I. How did the Impressionists perceive matter? II. What is the unifying element in a typical Impressionist painting? II. How did the Impressionists’ view of color differ from that of eighteenth-century artists?
(A) I only (B) III only (C) I and II only (D) II and III only (E) I, II, and III
7. The ideas attributed to the Impressionists in the passage suggest that an Impressionist painter would be most likely to agree with which of the following statement?
(A) A picture is significant primarily as a manifestation of the artist’s mental state. (B) The highest purpose of art is to teach religious truths. (C) The quality of a picture has nothing to do with the nature of the objects it depicts. (D) An artist should strive to recreate on canvas the inner nature of objects from real life. (E) It is futile to attempt to paint pictures that aim to copy the optical appearance of the world.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Re: The impressionist painters expressly disavowed any interest
[#permalink]
Updated on: 10 Oct 2012, 09:05
Bull78 wrote:
The impressionist painters expressly disavowed any interest in philosophy, yet their new approach to art had far-reaching philosophical implications. For the view of matter that the Impressionists assumed differed profoundly from the view that had previously prevailed among artists.This view helped to unify the artistic works created in the new style. The ancient Greeks had conceived of the world in concrete terms, even endowing abstract qualities with bodies. This Greek view of matter persisted, so far as painting was concerned, into the nineteenth century. The Impressionists, on the other hand, viewed light, not matter, as the ultimate visual reality. The philosopher Taine expressed the Impressionist view of things when he said, “The chief ‘person’ in a picture is the light in which everything is bathed.” In Impressionist painting, solid bodies became mere reflectors of light, and distinctions between one object and another became arbitrary conventions; for by light all things were welded together. The treatment of both color and outline was transformed as well. Color, formerly considered a property inherent in an object, was seen to be merely the result of vibrations of light on the object’s colorless surface. And outline, whose function had formerly been to indicate the limits of objects, now marked instead merely the boundary between units of pattern, which often merged into one another. The Impressionist world was composed not of separate objects but of many surfaces on which light struck and was reflected with varying intensity to the eye through the atmosphere, which modified it. It was this process that produced the mosaic of colors that formed an Impressionist canvas. “Light becomes the sole subject of the picture,” writes Mauclair. “The interest of the object upon which it plays is secondary. Painting thus conceived becomes a purely optic art.” From this profoundly revolutionary form of art, then, all ideas—religious, moral, psychological—were excluded, and so were all emotions except certain aesthetic ones. The people, places, and things depicted in an Impressionist picture do not tell story or convey any special meaning; they are, instead, merely parts of pattern of light drawn from nature and captured on canvas by the artist.
6. The passage contains information that answers which of the following questions? I. How did the Impressionists perceive matter? II. What is the unifying element in a typical Impressionist painting? II. How did the Impressionists’ view of color differ from that of eighteenth-century artists?
(A) I only (B) III only (C) I and II only (D) II and III only (E) I, II, and III
Question 1 and 2 answered in the passage right. I have bolded the excerpts from the passage. Please let me know what you guys think?. For question 3? where is the comparison made in the passage between Impressionists and 18th century painter?
7. The ideas attributed to the Impressionists in the passage suggest that an Impressionist painter would be most likely to agree with which of the following statement?
(A) A picture is significant primarily as a manifestation of the artist’s mental state. (B) The highest purpose of art is to teach religious truths. (C) The quality of a picture has nothing to do with the nature of the objects it depicts. (D) An artist should strive to recreate on canvas the inner nature of objects from real life. (E) It is futile to attempt to paint pictures that aim to copy the optical appearance of the world.
I cant relate this answer choice as well? can some1 tell me why its C? Where is quality of a picture has nothing to do with the nature of the objects discussed?
Originally posted by Jp27 on 10 Oct 2012, 08:59.
Last edited by Jp27 on 10 Oct 2012, 09:05, edited 2 times in total.
Re: The impressionist painters expressly disavowed any interest
[#permalink]
10 Oct 2012, 09:02
anukrati wrote:
Can anyone explain the answers for Question 4 and 5.
Thanks
4. According to the passage, the Impressionists believed that the atmosphere
(A) reflects light with varying intensity (B) creates the illusion of color in colorless surfaces (C) modifies the shapes of objects (D) is the result of vibrations of light (E) affects the way we perceived color
We can select E based on the information in bold. HTH
The Impressionist world was composed not of separate objects but of many surfaces on which light struck and was reflected with varying intensity to the eye through the atmosphere, which modified it.
Re: The impressionist painters expressly disavowed any interest
[#permalink]
11 Nov 2012, 11:03
Jp27 wrote:
Bull78 wrote:
The impressionist painters expressly disavowed any interest in philosophy, yet their new approach to art had far-reaching philosophical implications. For the view of matter that the Impressionists assumed differed profoundly from the view that had previously prevailed among artists.This view helped to unify the artistic works created in the new style. The ancient Greeks had conceived of the world in concrete terms, even endowing abstract qualities with bodies. This Greek view of matter persisted, so far as painting was concerned, into the nineteenth century. The Impressionists, on the other hand, viewed light, not matter, as the ultimate visual reality. The philosopher Taine expressed the Impressionist view of things when he said, “The chief ‘person’ in a picture is the light in which everything is bathed.” In Impressionist painting, solid bodies became mere reflectors of light, and distinctions between one object and another became arbitrary conventions; for by light all things were welded together. The treatment of both color and outline was transformed as well. Color, formerly considered a property inherent in an object, was seen to be merely the result of vibrations of light on the object’s colorless surface. And outline, whose function had formerly been to indicate the limits of objects, now marked instead merely the boundary between units of pattern, which often merged into one another. The Impressionist world was composed not of separate objects but of many surfaces on which light struck and was reflected with varying intensity to the eye through the atmosphere, which modified it. It was this process that produced the mosaic of colors that formed an Impressionist canvas. “Light becomes the sole subject of the picture,” writes Mauclair. “The interest of the object upon which it plays is secondary. Painting thus conceived becomes a purely optic art.” From this profoundly revolutionary form of art, then, all ideas—religious, moral, psychological—were excluded, and so were all emotions except certain aesthetic ones. The people, places, and things depicted in an Impressionist picture do not tell story or convey any special meaning; they are, instead, merely parts of pattern of light drawn from nature and captured on canvas by the artist.
6. The passage contains information that answers which of the following questions? I. How did the Impressionists perceive matter? II. What is the unifying element in a typical Impressionist painting? II. How did the Impressionists’ view of color differ from that of eighteenth-century artists?
(A) I only (B) III only (C) I and II only (D) II and III only (E) I, II, and III
Question 1 and 2 answered in the passage right. I have bolded the excerpts from the passage. Please let me know what you guys think?. For question 3? where is the comparison made in the passage between Impressionists and 18th century painter?
7. The ideas attributed to the Impressionists in the passage suggest that an Impressionist painter would be most likely to agree with which of the following statement?
(A) A picture is significant primarily as a manifestation of the artist’s mental state. (B) The highest purpose of art is to teach religious truths. (C) The quality of a picture has nothing to do with the nature of the objects it depicts. (D) An artist should strive to recreate on canvas the inner nature of objects from real life. (E) It is futile to attempt to paint pictures that aim to copy the optical appearance of the world.
I cant relate this answer choice as well? can some1 tell me why its C? Where is quality of a picture has nothing to do with the nature of the objects discussed?
Query for Q 6:
for the III: it is mentioned in the line - "Color, formerly considered a property inherent in an object, was seen to be merely the result of vibrations of light on the object’s colorless surface."
Query for Q 7: Go by Elimination method A. The Impressionists disavowed any philosophical element (i.e. thoughts emerging in their minds while painting or say a philosophical muse) related to their paintings. So impressionists were against it. B. "all ideas—religious, moral,psychological—were excluded" => no religious attachments. (Also the word 'highest' seems too harsh/extreme for GMAT) C. Hold it. D. 'An artist should strive to recreate on canvas the inner nature (i.e. abstract qualities within concrete bodies) of objects from real life.' This option seems like a Greek must have said it. (refer to Greeks in passage) E. 'It is futile to attempt to paint pictures that aim to copy the optical appearance of the world.' Futile??? I think the impressionists must have been proponents of optical depiction. So, this option is just the opposite.
Re: The impressionist painters expressly disavowed any interest
[#permalink]
25 Dec 2012, 14:16
Quote:
5. The author’s use of the term “mosaic of colors” (line 32) suggests that Impressionist paintings were characterized by
(A) discontinuous dabs of unmixed pigment (B) broad, sweeping brush strokes (C) clearly defined forms and objects (D) subjects devoid of emotive or literary qualities (E) the glowing reds, greens, and midnight blues of stained glass
I cannot understand why the answer to question 5 is A. Its not supported by the passage anywhere esp. 'unmixed pigment'.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
gmatclubot
Re: The impressionist painters expressly disavowed any interest [#permalink]