AndrewN wrote:
NandishSS wrote:
Quote:
The annual stockholders' report for Corporation X stated that profits were up 10 percent over the previous year, although profits as a percent of sales were down 10 percent. Total sales for that year were approximately what percent of sales for the previous year?
A. 78%
B. 90%
C. 110%
D. 122%
E. 190%
PS17302.01
HI
GMATGuruNY,
MentorTutoringCan you help me with this problem?
Profits as a percent of sales were down 10 percent -- > How translate to Profits?
Hello,
NandishSS. I agree with the approaches outlined above by just about everyone who has posted, so I will spare you a recapitulation. I will add a twist to the mix by outlining how you can often use the answer choices in a PS problem against the test to arrive at an accurate conclusion. Say that you were stumped on this question, and after a minute or so of inactivity, of not being able to figure out a way to make headway into the problem, you decided to size up the answer choices instead. Notice the pairs specifically: 78% and 122% are 22% away from 100, while 90% and 110% form a second pair and are 10% away from 100. The outlier is 190%, and it is so far beyond the second largest value that we can ignore it for now. That is, since GMAC™ designs questions to trap people, it is highly likely that one of the two pairs will lead to the correct answer while the other will lead to a flawed conclusion that is probably based on an assumption. In this case, a reasonable
assumption is that an increase or decrease of 10%
must mean that 90 and 110 are the correct numbers. The savvy GMAT™ test-taker will know to avoid this probable trap. The other pair, 78% and 122%, looks more promising.
At this point, you can assess whether the question is asking for the smaller or larger value. Although
that year is ambiguous,
sales for the previous year is not, so we know we are looking for a figure that would represent
sales for this year. Logically speaking, if profits were up in general but profits from sales were down, then we can appreciate that
total sales should have gone
up. Why? Because a percent increase or decrease from a larger value is not as pronounced as that from a smaller value. For example, an increase from 1 to 2 represents a 100% jump, but a decrease from 2 to 1 represents just a 50% drop. A logical guess would be (D), 122%, if you had crossed the 2-minute mark. If you had a little time to spare and wanted to work out a solution, then nothing beats the more rigorous approaches above. You could even back-solve by using 122 as the target value.
I add this point not in an effort to outshine the responses above—those approaches are better—but in a pinch, smart guessing beats out random guessing every time, and a 50-51 scorer can remain calm when a lower scorer might hit the panic button. An analytical approach can help you keep calmer and increase the likelihood that you will arrive at a correct conclusion, nothing more.
- Andrew
AndrewN hey they Happy New Year greetings
this is how understood problem
number of stocks sold last year = s
price per stock last year p
profits last year = s*p=100
since this year profits were higher despite decline in number of sold stocks then logically price of stock have risen this year, right ?
number of stocks sold this year = 0.9s (cause this is how i understood this "
although profits as a percent of sales were down 10 percent" )
price per stock this year p(1+x/100) where x is a percent increase
total profit this year = p(1+x/100) *0.9s (where x is percent increase)
now its getting scary cause i m getting too many variables...
so question is: Total sales for that year were approximately what percent of sales for the previous year?
so i do this
p(1+x/100) *0.9s / s
now here i got stuck ,
whats wrong with my solution
p.s. unless i dont understand what mistake i am making in my solution, i wont understand other posts above.