Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 23:50 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 23:50

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Current Student
Joined: 31 Aug 2016
Status:Valar Dohaeris
Posts: 299
Own Kudos [?]: 916 [3]
Given Kudos: 911
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V37
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 30 Dec 2016
Posts: 194
Own Kudos [?]: 729 [0]
Given Kudos: 199
GMAT 1: 650 Q42 V37
GPA: 4
WE:Business Development (Other)
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 30 Dec 2016
Posts: 194
Own Kudos [?]: 729 [0]
Given Kudos: 199
GMAT 1: 650 Q42 V37
GPA: 4
WE:Business Development (Other)
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 30 Dec 2016
Posts: 194
Own Kudos [?]: 729 [0]
Given Kudos: 199
GMAT 1: 650 Q42 V37
GPA: 4
WE:Business Development (Other)
Send PM
Re: In the 1930s the Payne Foundation funded studies attributing juvenile [#permalink]

3) If the broadcast industry is just now proposing a rating system, what could have been the cause of this? Quite possibly the backlash to the increased violence that the author discusses. (B) says the same: those who have spoken out against media violence have made an impact on the networks.

(A): Opposite. This choice would suggest that the networks have taken action to at least patrol the content of their programming, though they might not necessarily change that content.

(B): The correct answer

(C): Out of Scope. The stations might simply be reacting to pressure. There‘s no suggestion that the action is being taken because they‘ve acknowledged a link between violence in the media and the real world.

(D): Out of Scope. Though the networks will rate content, this doesn‘t mean that they‘ll change it.

(E): Incorrect, as described above.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Mar 2018
Posts: 20
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [0]
Given Kudos: 25
Schools: XLRI
Send PM
Re: In the 1930s the Payne Foundation funded studies attributing juvenile [#permalink]
sandysilva wrote:

3) If the broadcast industry is just now proposing a rating system, what could have been the cause of this? Quite possibly the backlash to the increased violence that the author discusses. (B) says the same: those who have spoken out against media violence have made an impact on the networks.

(A): Opposite. This choice would suggest that the networks have taken action to at least patrol the content of their programming, though they might not necessarily change that content.

(B): The correct answer

(C): Out of Scope. The stations might simply be reacting to pressure. There‘s no suggestion that the action is being taken because they‘ve acknowledged a link between violence in the media and the real world.

(D): Out of Scope. Though the networks will rate content, this doesn‘t mean that they‘ll change it.

(E): Incorrect, as described above.


Could you explain this? The rating systems of both parties tend towards more violence in their zest for competition...With ratings of both reduced...how can one conclude that perpetrators of the theory that violence comes from media succedded ?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Apr 2020
Posts: 3
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [1]
Given Kudos: 24
Send PM
Re: In the 1930s the Payne Foundation funded studies attributing juvenile [#permalink]
1
Kudos
hi SajjadAhmad .... kindly help me understand what makes B a better choice than C for qn 3 ?
my understanding is that if it was because of the pressure from people blaming media why it did not happen earlier ?
It is becuase more stronger link is found i.e. more associated deaths etc that has turned the table so option C should be correct.
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13961
Own Kudos [?]: 32924 [1]
Given Kudos: 5778
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: In the 1930s the Payne Foundation funded studies attributing juvenile [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
RoshanAditya wrote:
hi SajjadAhmad .... kindly help me understand what makes B a better choice than C for qn 3 ?
my understanding is that if it was because of the pressure from people blaming media why it did not happen earlier ?
It is becuase more stronger link is found i.e. more associated deaths etc that has turned the table so option C should be correct.


Please read this explanation of question number 3.

https://gmatclub.com/forum/in-the-1930s ... l#p2134850
Intern
Intern
Joined: 18 Nov 2017
Posts: 25
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 20
Send PM
Re: In the 1930s the Payne Foundation funded studies attributing juvenile [#permalink]
Q3 : Explanation says that patrolling means that the content has not been necessarily changed. However, in question, it is written that the network has implemented a rating system. This would mean that they are not changing the content, only restricting the audience.
Further, as the content has been restricted for the lower age group (assumption) with the help of patrolling, hence it can be contributed to the uproar against higher criminal activity involving children. However, overall for all age group, this would not be true.
Furthermore, as mentioned in the passage that the movie lost audience (especially adults) [line11] and hence launched action movies to gain back the audience. Hence it can be inferred that the TV industry would like to encash on the same barring the children from unnecessary violence, hence the rating system.

Therefore, out of the options provided, Option B cannot be the answer, as it says "Stricter Content". With the rating system, the content will not be stricter for a specific age group (as in the movies); not the full library.

Proposed answer - A; as this invokes morality in the TV media to gain back some of the adult audience lost to movies and shielding children from unnecessary violence.
CrackVerbal Representative
Joined: 02 Mar 2019
Posts: 273
Own Kudos [?]: 277 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: In the 1930s the Payne Foundation funded studies attributing juvenile [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
1. The passage suggests that having more stringent controls on media violence would NOT have a great effect on the death rate because:

This is detailed in the 3rd paragraph, where the passage states: "The attempt to demonize the media distracts attention from the real causes of—and the serious remedies for—the epidemic of violence....Let us make an exceedingly high estimate that the resulting carnage results in 100 deaths per year that would otherwise not have taken place. These would amount to 0.28 percent of the total of 36,000 murders accidents, and suicides committed by gunshot in the United States in 1992."

A. the numbers of deaths resulting from so-called "copycat" acts of violence composes only a small portion of violent deaths each year. Correct answer and consistent with that above.

B. the number of deaths resulting from so-called "copycat" acts of violence would remain unchanged nonetheless. The passage does not state this. Eliminate.

C. networks and film studios lack the personnel to enforce any new regulation. The passage does not state this. Eliminate.

D. there exists no definite link between media violence and actual violence. The passage does not state this. Eliminate.

E. very few people watch television these days. The passage does not state this. Eliminate.

2. If delivered in a paper that sought to undermine the points of this passage, which of the following statements, if true, would most seriously weaken the passage‘s central argument?

The passage's central argument is that media does not impact actual crime as much as other factors like jobs, poverty, guns etc. We need to undermine this.

A. The number of violent acts depicted in the media has remained more or less constant for the past decade. Nothing in the passage tells us about the number of violent crimes in the corresponding period. This does not undermine the argument. Eliminate.

B. A Canadian study reported a sixteen-percent increase in violent crimes after exposure to television and film episodes in which violent acts were depicted. This clearly establishes a link between violence in media (TV) and actual violent crime and thus undermines the passage's central argument. Correct answer.

C. Politicians and celebrities are assisting effectively in diminishing violence. This does not undermine the argument since it does not talk about violence in media at all. Eliminate.

D. Films belonging to the "action" genre have found little acceptance at the box office This does not undermine the argument since it does not talk about actual violent crime at all. Eliminate.

E. Children become more violent after playing violent video games This does not undermine the argument since it does not talk about violence in media at all - video games are not mentioned in the passage. Eliminate.

3. The broadcast networks have recently proposed a system of rating program content, similar to those ratings in the film industry. Which of the following best characterizes the relevance of this statement?

A. The statement acknowledges that the networks have taken little responsibility in patrolling the content of their programming. This question talks about action that the networks have taken. It does not tell us anything about their actions prior to this. We cannot draw the conclusion that the networks have "taken little responsibility" (ie; have not taken any responsibility) in patrolling their content. Eliminate.

B. The statement implies that those who speak out against media violence have had significant success in convincing the networks to enforce stricter content standards. The question does show "stricter content standards". We do not know whether this is as a result of "those who speak out against media violence". As of now, we can hold on to this option.

C. The statement suggests that some convincing evidence supporting a stronger link between media violence and violent acts has been found. The question does not mention anything about any additional evidence linking media violence and actual crime. Eliminate.

D. The statement suggests that networks will decrease the amount of shows that contain violent content. The question merely talks about rating shows and now reducing or increasing violent content. Eliminate.

E. The statement has no relevance to the argument in the passage There is some relevance since the passage does talk about regulation of content on networks and cinema. Eliminate.

Even though it is not perfect, (B) is the best among the answer options provided.

Hope this helps.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17227
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: In the 1930s the Payne Foundation funded studies attributing juvenile [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In the 1930s the Payne Foundation funded studies attributing juvenile [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
13961 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne