anureetjuneja wrote:
For the first question, I'm torn between B and D.
Option B states that the author persuades the reader that trained food critics should evaluate dining experiences. Is that not what the author's intention seems to be?
Option D again seems correct except for the latter part which mentions "the implications of being a food critic." Can someone please help me understand how is that implied?
Explanation
1. The primary purpose of this passage is to __________.
Explanation
The primary purpose of this passage is to inform the reader about the complexities of evaluating food quality and the implications of being a food critic.
The passage begins by discussing how our perceptions of food flavors are subjective and influenced by various senses, including taste, smell, sight, touch, and even hearing. It mentions that chefs manipulate ingredients to maximize the color of produce and that diners who experience food with soothing music enjoy their meals more. This information sets the stage for discussing the role of food critics.
The passage then contrasts everyday diners with food critics, explaining that critics are trained to consider their experiences of food through the lens of each sense, independently evaluating smell and taste. It highlights that assessing the quality of food is an art form that requires acumen and is performed by few. The passage also acknowledges the increasing ease for anyone to create a blog or column and offer their opinions on restaurants and cuisine, which some see as egalitarian, while others view it as diluting the selectivity of the field of food critics.
Overall, the passage aims to provide insights into the complexities of evaluating food quality, the role of food critics, and the potential impact of the proliferation of online food opinions. Therefore, the correct answer is (D) inform the reader about the complexities of evaluating food quality and the implications of being a food critic.
Answer: D