Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Grab 20% off any Target Test Prep GMAT Focus plan during our Flash Sale. Just enter the coupon code FLASH20 at checkout to save up to $320. The offer ends on Tuesday, April 30.
n this GMAT experience talk show, we talk to Tavishi, a young MBA aspirant from India who recently scored 725 in her latest GMAT Focus exam. It’s a 99.9 percentile score on new GMAT Focus edition and she achieved this feat in her first GMAT attempt.
What do András from Hungary, Conner from the United States, Giorgio from Italy, Leo from Germany, and Saahil from India have in common? They all earned top scores on the GMAT Focus Edition using the Target Test Prep course!
earn how to utilize unique factors about your profile to stand out in the MBA application. Join Jen with ARINGO as she dives into the different parts of the application where you can share your individuality in a stacked applicant pool.
In this webinar, Rajat Sadana, GMAT Club’s #1 rated expert will help you create a personalized study plan so that each one of you can visualize your journey to a top GMAT Focus Score.
We know Strengthen and Weaken questions account for more than 50% of the CR questions on the GMAT. With CR becoming even more important on GMAT Focus, it's time you strengthen your weaknesses with an approach that improves your solving time and accuracy!
Any reported connection between electromagnetic fields, such
[#permalink]
03 Mar 2008, 17:46
Show timer
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
50%
(00:50)
correct
50%
(00:56)
wrong
based on 3
sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
Any reported connection between electromagnetic fields, such as those produced by high-tension wires, and cancer is unsubstantiated. The cancer rate of urban residents is at least as high as that of people living in rural areas close to high-tension wires.
Which of the following, if true, would most severely damage the claim above?
Most cancers are caused by interactions between biochemical and environmental factors.
Although in many big cities the electrical system is hidden from view, residents of such cities may be living very close to the underground sub-stations of utilities, which produce strong electromagnetic fields.
Electromagnetic fields are produced not only by high-tension wires but also by ordinary household appliances, such as microwave ovens and refrigerators.
The cancer most often linked with electromagnetic fields is leukemia, which is incurable.
Both big cities and areas near high-tension wires are not free of the myriad number of known cancer-causing agents.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Re: Any reported connection between electromagnetic fields, such
[#permalink]
03 Mar 2008, 19:29
I will go with C. Because it explains that apart from high tension wire, there are other things which produces electromagnetic things. So people are affected by it.
Re: Any reported connection between electromagnetic fields, such
[#permalink]
04 Mar 2008, 00:38
Expert Reply
B
[F]: electromagnetic fields [G1]: urban residents [G2]: people living in rural areas close to high-tension wires --> [G2] is exposed to [F] [R]: The cancer rate
The argument: [F] is not a cause because: [R] of [G1] (Assumption: [G1] is not exposed to [F] ) equals [R] of [G2] that exposed to [F].
Only B destroys the assumption. In C we don't know the value of electromagnetic fields. Maybe it is very small. In B we have "strong".
Re: Any reported connection between electromagnetic fields, such
[#permalink]
04 Mar 2008, 05:54
I'll go for C .
B rather strengthens the argument.
Statement B supports/strengthens the author's argument that the relationship between cancer and high tension wires does not hold. B proves that there are other alternatives and thus supports the argument.
However C goes a step further to confirm that Electromagnetic fields are produced not only by high-tension wires but also by ordinary household appliances, such as microwave ovens and refrigerators thus humans have regular contact with it. This explains why there are high incidences of cancer.
Re: Any reported connection between electromagnetic fields, such
[#permalink]
04 Mar 2008, 06:53
OA is B.
Walker, if you have a chance...could you explain your "markup" and how you broke that down (or provide a link showing this kind of logic). I'm intriged...
Re: Any reported connection between electromagnetic fields, such
[#permalink]
04 Mar 2008, 09:22
nice question In B we have "may be".. That made me stop and think.. and run out of time quickly.. On the other hand, C is too broad.. it does not relate to urban residents only.. and we are to state that urban residents are equally exposed to electromagnetic waves as rural residents are.. therefore, B
Thanks for the question and explanations that followed
Re: Any reported connection between electromagnetic fields, such
[#permalink]
04 Mar 2008, 09:57
Expert Reply
giantSwan wrote:
OA is B.
Walker, if you have a chance...could you explain your "markup" and how you broke that down (or provide a link showing this kind of logic). I'm intriged...
It is my technique I think each CR has a logic line and if we can see this line, the solution of the question will be easier.
Re: Any reported connection between electromagnetic fields, such
[#permalink]
04 Mar 2008, 16:46
walker wrote:
giantSwan wrote:
OA is B.
Walker, if you have a chance...could you explain your "markup" and how you broke that down (or provide a link showing this kind of logic). I'm intriged...
It is my technique I think each CR has a logic line and if we can see this line, the solution of the question will be easier.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
gmatclubot
Re: Any reported connection between electromagnetic fields, such [#permalink]