Last visit was: 30 Apr 2024, 05:23 It is currently 30 Apr 2024, 05:23

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Feb 2007
Posts: 75
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Send PM
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 458
Own Kudos [?]: 938 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
 Q50  V34
Send PM
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Posts: 285
Own Kudos [?]: 317 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 68
Own Kudos [?]: 117 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Any reported connection between electromagnetic fields, such [#permalink]
I didn't understand this passage at all. Could anyone explain?
SVP
SVP
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 2408
Own Kudos [?]: 10041 [0]
Given Kudos: 361
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Send PM
Re: Any reported connection between electromagnetic fields, such [#permalink]
Expert Reply
B

[F]: electromagnetic fields
[G1]: urban residents
[G2]: people living in rural areas close to high-tension wires --> [G2] is exposed to [F]
[R]: The cancer rate

The argument: [F] is not a cause because: [R] of [G1] (Assumption: [G1] is not exposed to [F] ) equals [R] of [G2] that exposed to [F].

Only B destroys the assumption.
In C we don't know the value of electromagnetic fields. Maybe it is very small. In B we have "strong".
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Feb 2008
Posts: 196
Own Kudos [?]: 952 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: Any reported connection between electromagnetic fields, such [#permalink]
I'll go for C .

B rather strengthens the argument.

Statement B supports/strengthens the author's argument that the relationship between cancer and high tension wires does not hold. B proves that there are other alternatives and thus supports the argument.

However C goes a step further to confirm that Electromagnetic fields are produced not only by high-tension wires but also by ordinary household appliances, such as microwave ovens and refrigerators thus humans have regular contact with it. This explains why there are high incidences of cancer.

What is th OA?
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Feb 2007
Posts: 75
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Send PM
Re: Any reported connection between electromagnetic fields, such [#permalink]
OA is B.

Walker, if you have a chance...could you explain your "markup" and how you broke that down (or provide a link showing this kind of logic). I'm intriged...
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Dec 2007
Posts: 39
Own Kudos [?]: 79 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Any reported connection between electromagnetic fields, such [#permalink]
nice question :)
In B we have "may be".. That made me stop and think.. and run out of time quickly..
On the other hand, C is too broad.. it does not relate to urban residents only.. and we are to state that urban residents are equally exposed to electromagnetic waves as rural residents are.. therefore, B

Thanks for the question and explanations that followed
SVP
SVP
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 2408
Own Kudos [?]: 10041 [0]
Given Kudos: 361
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Send PM
Re: Any reported connection between electromagnetic fields, such [#permalink]
Expert Reply
giantSwan wrote:
OA is B.

Walker, if you have a chance...could you explain your "markup" and how you broke that down (or provide a link showing this kind of logic). I'm intriged...


It is my technique :) I think each CR has a logic line and if we can see this line, the solution of the question will be easier.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 89
Own Kudos [?]: 166 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Schools:Chicago Booth
Send PM
Re: Any reported connection between electromagnetic fields, such [#permalink]
ashkrs wrote:
Well I think B is correct.
Only B talks about big cities. C talks about microwave and refrigerators which could be present in rural areas too.


good point. totally missed it.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Feb 2007
Posts: 75
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Send PM
Re: Any reported connection between electromagnetic fields, such [#permalink]
walker wrote:
giantSwan wrote:
OA is B.

Walker, if you have a chance...could you explain your "markup" and how you broke that down (or provide a link showing this kind of logic). I'm intriged...


It is my technique :) I think each CR has a logic line and if we can see this line, the solution of the question will be easier.


You should file for a patent ;)
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Feb 2008
Posts: 68
Own Kudos [?]: 71 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Any reported connection between electromagnetic fields, such [#permalink]
it is B



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Any reported connection between electromagnetic fields, such [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6923 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne