Last visit was: 28 Apr 2024, 22:10 It is currently 28 Apr 2024, 22:10

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Posts: 322
Own Kudos [?]: 2165 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Apr 2004
Posts: 106
Own Kudos [?]: 35 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Utrecht
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 510
Own Kudos [?]: 159 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 Aug 2004
Posts: 18
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: CR Smuggling [#permalink]
i would choose D. the inspector is trying to prove that he always knows when someone is trying to cheat him... but if someone who is trying to cheat him (by wittingly carrying contraband) passes unstopped, then his accuracy in detecting intent isn't perfect.
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 603
Own Kudos [?]: 674 [0]
Given Kudos: 17
Concentration: Strategy
Schools:Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
 Q48  V33 GMAT 2: 670  Q46  V36 GMAT 3: 720  Q49  V40
Send PM
Re: CR Smuggling [#permalink]
Another vote for E folks. It alone exposes the logical flaw inherent in the inspectors argument. The argument - inspector can always TELL whoever is carrying contraband and TRYING to deceive him. However how about if someone is carrying contraband unwittingly. In this case there's no deliberate attempt to deceive and hence the inspector wouldn't sense it.
avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Jul 2004
Posts: 318
Own Kudos [?]: 363 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: CR Smuggling [#permalink]
Fact: Guy points hand at some one and they turn up being bad guys, carrying contraband goods.
Conclusion: Guy is good in finding people who deceive.

The missing piece is, "What about people whom does not point hand at? Are they always good guys?"
If the answer is "Yes", then it makes sense to say he is good in finding cheaters.

This flaw is pointed in D.

(I am a little skeptical about the use of "could" in all four choices except C. Using "could" does not make a strong objection. It would have been better if it were a past-tense-fact)
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 558
Own Kudos [?]: 987 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Florida
Send PM
Re: CR Smuggling [#permalink]
yep. D proposes valid criticism
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 603
Own Kudos [?]: 674 [0]
Given Kudos: 17
Concentration: Strategy
Schools:Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
 Q48  V33 GMAT 2: 670  Q46  V36 GMAT 3: 720  Q49  V40
Send PM
Re: CR Smuggling [#permalink]
Argument - the inspector, based on his 10 years experience, has always been able to catch those carrying contraband and trying to deceive him. One of the central pieces of his argument relies on the assumption that those carrying contraband knowingly try to deceive him and he catches them.

E exposes a possiblity that some people may unknowingly carry contraband and hence there would be no question of them trying to deceive. This exposes a LOGICAL FLAW in the inspector's argument that he can always tell those carrying contraband.
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Posts: 322
Own Kudos [?]: 2165 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: CR Smuggling [#permalink]
OA is D Thanks all for nice explanation.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: CR Smuggling [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6923 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne