Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 20:36 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 20:36

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 122
Own Kudos [?]: 38 [1]
Given Kudos: 8
Concentration: Sustainable Enterprise & Operations
Schools:Ross Class of 2012
 Q48  V32 GMAT 2: 710  Q49  V38
WE 1: Consumer Goods / IT
WE 2: Retail / Logistics
Send PM
User avatar
VP
VP
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 1021
Own Kudos [?]: 1726 [0]
Given Kudos: 19
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 518
Own Kudos [?]: 3827 [0]
Given Kudos: 17
Send PM
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Posts: 392
Own Kudos [?]: 4074 [0]
Given Kudos: 18
Name: Ronak Amin
Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX) - Class of 2014
Send PM
Re: M09 #23 [#permalink]
should be D.
1) difference is in terms of percentage so whatever is the absolute figure the relation will be the same for price of A and B >> Suff

2) difference is in terms of absolute value. But the lesser absolute value(B) is decreasing and the higher absolute value(A) is increasing. So A will always be greater than B. ( Note, if A is less than B and if A is increasing and B is decreasing then this condition will be insufficient, I have explained it below ).

Actual problem:

eg. price of A is 11 => after 15% increase it is something greater than 11.
price of B is 1 => after 25% decrease it is something less than 1.
A > B

eg. price of A is 110 => after 15% increase it is something greater than 110.
price of B is 100 => after 25% decrease it is something less than 75.
A > B.

Sufficient.
So, D.

Lets see the corollary, that is if it is given that B is 10 more than A.
eg. price of A is 1 => after 15% increase it is 1.15.
price of B is 11 => after 25% decrease it is 8.25
A < B.

eg. price of A is 100 => after 15% increase it is 115.
price of B is 110 => after 25% decrease it is 82.5.
A > B.
So, in this case this condition will be insufficient.

nitya34 wrote:
If the price of a mobile phone of model \(A\) increased by 15% from last year and the price of a mobile phone of model \(B\) decreased by 25% from last year, is the current price of a mobile phone of model \(A\) greater than that of a mobile phone of model \(B\) ?

1. Last year, the price of a mobile phone of model B was 10 percent greater than that of a mobile phone of model A
2. Last year, model A cost $10 more than model B


is it A?

OE never talks about condition no (2)

and OA given is D
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 10 Apr 2008
Posts: 28
Own Kudos [?]: 22 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Send PM
Re: M09 #23 [#permalink]
But you're picking a case that works.

What if A = 1
and B = 11

Then new A = 1.15
new B = 8.25

The OA is wrong.

Economist wrote:
should be D.
1) difference is in terms of percentage so whatever is the absolute figure the relation will be the same for price of A and B >> Suff

2) difference is in terms of absolute value. But the lesser absolute value(B) is decreasing and the higher absolute value(A) is increasing. So A will always be greater than B. ( Note, if A is less than B and if A is increasing and B is decreasing then this condition will be insufficient, I have explained it below ).

Actual problem:

eg. price of A is 11 => after 15% increase it is something greater than 11.
price of B is 1 => after 25% decrease it is something less than 1.
A > B

eg. price of A is 110 => after 15% increase it is something greater than 110.
price of B is 100 => after 25% decrease it is something less than 75.
A > B.

Sufficient.
So, D.

Lets see the corollary, that is if it is given that B is 10 more than A.
eg. price of A is 1 => after 15% increase it is 1.15.
price of B is 11 => after 25% decrease it is 8.25
A < B.

eg. price of A is 100 => after 15% increase it is 115.
price of B is 110 => after 25% decrease it is 82.5.
A > B.
So, in this case this condition will be insufficient.

nitya34 wrote:
If the price of a mobile phone of model \(A\) increased by 15% from last year and the price of a mobile phone of model \(B\) decreased by 25% from last year, is the current price of a mobile phone of model \(A\) greater than that of a mobile phone of model \(B\) ?

1. Last year, the price of a mobile phone of model B was 10 percent greater than that of a mobile phone of model A
2. Last year, model A cost $10 more than model B


is it A?

OE never talks about condition no (2)

and OA given is D
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 14 Dec 2009
Posts: 22
Own Kudos [?]: 69 [0]
Given Kudos: 20
Send PM
Re: M09 #23 [#permalink]
The statements must be changed! They are confusing and take precious time during the test! They cannot contradict each other!
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 17 Jan 2010
Posts: 53
Own Kudos [?]: 56 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: M09 #23 [#permalink]
The price of a mobile phone of model A increased by 15% from last year while the price of a mobile phone of model B decreased by 25% from last year. Is the current price of a mobile phone of model A bigger than that of a mobile phone of model B?

1. Last year the price of a mobile phone of model B was 10 percent bigger than that of a mobile phone of model A
2. Last year model A cost $10 more than model B

(C) 2008 GMAT Club - m09#23

* Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but Statement (2) ALONE is not sufficient
* Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but Statement (1) ALONE is not sufficient
* BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient
* EACH statement ALONE is sufficient
* Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient


Here's an explanation,

Let Price Cell Phone A last year be X , and that of Model B be Y
According to Information given in the question

Model A's current price = X + 15/100X , Model B's current price = Y - 25/100Y

Now lets work with the statements given.

1) Last year the price of a mobile phone of model B was 10 percent bigger than that of a mobile phone of model A

Y = 10/100X , so we have a relationship between Y and X , Substitute this value of Y in Model B's current price

Model B's current price = 10/100X - (25/100*10/100)X, which is clearly lesser than Model A's current price X + 15/100X - hence sufficient.

2)Last year model A cost $10 more than model B

X = Y + 10 or Y = X - 10 , again substitute this value in Model B's current Price and we can compare the two to tell if X's current price is greater or less than B's current price.

No point getting bogged down in calculations.

Hence answer - D, each statement alone is sufficient.

Archived Topic
Hi there,
Archived GMAT Club Tests question - no more replies possible.
Where to now? Try our up-to-date Free Adaptive GMAT Club Tests for the latest questions.
Still interested? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for better discussion and related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: M09 #23 [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92915 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne