KillDgmat wrote:
Hey,
Why C is wrong?
C. Foods often must be fortified with vitamin supplements because naturally occurring vitamins are removed during processing.
It means that vitamins supplements alone is not enough to provide the required vitamins, hence they are combined with food.
tia.
Hey
KillDgmatMy POE below
Premise : - Many breakfast cereals are fortified with vitamin supplements. Some of these cereals provide 100 percent of the recommended daily requirement of vitamins.
Conclusion : - Nevertheless, a well-balanced breakfast, including a variety of foods, is a better source of those vitamins than are such fortified breakfast cereals alone.
Prethinking : - Anything that suggests "well balanced diet"(WBD) is better than Fortified cereals(FC) alone - is my answer. In other words we need a statement that says WBD > FC
Which of the following, if true, would most strongly support the position above?
(A) In many foods, the natural combination of vitamins with other nutrients makes those vitamins more usable by the body than are vitamins added in vitamin supplements.
Correct Choice. This statement perfectly says why "WBD" is better than "FC(Supplements)"(B) People who regularly eat cereals fortified with vitamin supplements sometimes neglect to eat the foods in which the vitamins occur naturally.
How does it matter if people neglect to eat naturally occurring food? This is no way telling me WBD > FC(C) Foods often must be fortified with vitamin supplements because naturally occurring vitamins are removed during processing.
This option is talking about FC or rather describing it. But doesn't tell me if WBD > FC(D) Unprocessed cereals are naturally high in several of the vitamins that are usually added to fortified breakfast cereals.
So what? This option doesn't answer WBD > FC . out(E) Cereals containing vitamin supplements are no harder to digest than similar cereals without added vitamins.
Out of scope. The prompt or author is not bothered about the digestion of WBD and FC