Aryaa03 wrote:
Please explain this GMATNinja KarishmaB MartyMurray
On these questions, you always want to start by cutting straight to the heart of the passage. Here, the conclusion is that the main function of grooming in apes monkeys is social cohesion.
So what are those bold parts doing? The first seems like evidence or a premise, informing us that in many species grooming goes way beyond what's necessary to keep fur pristine. The second also seems like a premise: grooming isn't about health benefits.
Put another way, the bold portions support the conclusion by pointing out what grooming isn't really used for -- it's not just about keeping the fur nice and shiny, and it's not just about health benefits.
To the answers!
Quote:
(A) The first is an observation for which an explanation is provided; the second is a conclusion for which support is provided.
Nope. The second boldface statement is definitely not a conclusion. Kill (A).
Quote:
(B) The first is an explicitly supported conclusion, but not the main conclusion; the second is a premise that supports the main conclusion.
The first isn't a conclusion. (B) is out.
Quote:
(C) The first is a premise that supports the only conclusion by casting doubt on an alternative hypothesis; so is the second.
Looks good to me! Both statements are premises discuss what grooming
isn't for. Hold on to (C).
Quote:
(D) The first is a premise supporting the second; the second is the main conclusion but not the only conclusion.
The second statement definitely is not a conclusion. So long, (D).
Quote:
(E) The first provides an explanation for a puzzling observation; the second rules out an alternative explanation for that observation.
The first isn't an explanation -- it's an observation about animal behavior. And there's nothing puzzling about it. It appears to be a behavior common to many animals. So (E) is out.
And we're left with (C), which is our answer. The takeaway: getting right to the heart of the passage is also crucial in boldfaced questions.
I hope that helps!