It is currently 22 Oct 2017, 19:58

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Prior to the new poice patrolling program, which requires police cars

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
P
Joined: 26 Feb 2016
Posts: 1471

Kudos [?]: 598 [0], given: 16

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
WE: Sales (Retail)
Premium Member CAT Tests
Prior to the new poice patrolling program, which requires police cars [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Aug 2017, 20:50
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

59% (01:07) correct 41% (01:03) wrong based on 146 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Prior to the new police patrolling program, which requires police cars to patrol areas of the city every hour, the sale of burglar alarms in the city was high. However, since the new program has come in place, people are no longer buying those expensive equipment. Clearly, the police patrolling program is the reason for the decline in purchase of the burglar alarms.

The argument above assumes that

A. new police patrolling program is effective in controlling burglaries
B. most people supported the new police patrolling program
C. people's perception of the threat of burglaries decreased because of the new police patrolling program
D. people thrust the police patrolling vehicles more than they trust burglar alarms.
E. people have formed an opinion that even the most advanced burglar alarms cannot help prevent robberies because the burglars have become more technologically advanced.

Source : Experts Global
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Stay hungry, Stay foolish

2017-2018 MBA Deadlines

Class of 2020: Rotman Thread | Schulich Thread
Class of 2019: Sauder Thread

Kudos [?]: 598 [0], given: 16

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2017
Posts: 6

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Prior to the new poice patrolling program, which requires police cars [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Aug 2017, 21:10
Since it is a causal argument so for correct assumption cause implies effect and effect must be true . Thus option A is correct.

Sent from my Redmi 3S using GMAT Club Forum mobile app

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 09 Oct 2014
Posts: 19

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 9

Prior to the new poice patrolling program, which requires police cars [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Aug 2017, 21:33
pushpitkc wrote:
background information; premise(Prior to the new police patrolling program, which requires police cars to patrol areas of the city every hour, the sale of burglar alarms in the city was high.) However, (since the new program has come in place, people are no longer buying those expensive equipment) Premise. Clearly,(the police patrolling program is the reason for the decline in purchase of the burglar alarms.)
Conclusion

The argument above assumes that

A. new police patrolling program is effective in controlling burglaries
B. most people supported the new police patrolling program
C. people's perception of the threat of burglaries decreased because of the new police patrolling program
D. people thrust the police patrolling vehicles more than they trust burglar alarms.
E. people have formed an opinion that even the most advanced burglar alarms cannot help prevent robberies because the burglars have become more technologically advanced.

Source : Experts Global


The assumption should always be a glue to join the premise and the conclusion. When the assumption is negated the argument should fall apart. Only C is perfectly acting as a glue here.
My pick- C
_________________

Appreciate my post with Kudos if it is helpful :thumbup:
All the best for your prep :)

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 9

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 28 Jun 2017
Posts: 6

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 33

Re: Prior to the new poice patrolling program, which requires police cars [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Aug 2017, 23:21
My take is C:
A. new police patrolling program is effective in controlling burglaries

Not sure whether the alarms were effective as well, but people had the alarms installed. Even if the program is not effective, people know that paroling progarm is an alternate to the alarms.

B. most people supported the new police patrolling program
Doesn't matter whether people supported the program. It is in place. Therefore, OOS.

C. people's perception of the threat of burglaries decreased because of the new police patrolling program

This option seems correct. Yes, people have started believing that patrolling program is in fact reducing burglaries, hence they have stopped buying the alarm. Negate it .. people believe that patrolling hasn't decreased the burglaries, they wont stop buying the alarms.

D. people thrust the police patrolling vehicles more than they trust burglar alarms.

People may trust patrolling vehicles more, but is it to the extent that they stop buying alarms. Do they believe, they need both alarms and patrolling vehicle or just patrolling vehicle ( so that they stop buying the alarms) - not clear. Hence, not a good answer choice.

E. people have formed an opinion that even the most advanced burglar alarms cannot help prevent robberies because the burglars have become more technologically advanced.

If people have formed an opinion that alarms don't work, then, even if the patrolling happens or not, they wont buy the alarms. In this case, patrolling is not a reason that they stopped buying alarms. This seems to be a kind of weakener.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 33

BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
P
Joined: 26 Feb 2016
Posts: 1471

Kudos [?]: 598 [0], given: 16

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
WE: Sales (Retail)
Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Prior to the new poice patrolling program, which requires police cars [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Sep 2017, 18:56
Tough luck Play4Ever!
Awesome job Gags10 and Khuranasup


Video Explanation by Experts Global


_________________

Stay hungry, Stay foolish

2017-2018 MBA Deadlines

Class of 2020: Rotman Thread | Schulich Thread
Class of 2019: Sauder Thread

Kudos [?]: 598 [0], given: 16

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 17 Aug 2016
Posts: 51

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 25

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Prior to the new poice patrolling program, which requires police cars [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Sep 2017, 01:11
Premise: Prior to the new police patrolling program, which requires police cars to patrol areas of the city every hour, the sale of burglar alarms in the city was high.

Counter-premise: However, since the new program has come in place, people are no longer buying those expensive equipment.

Conclusion: Clearly, the police patrolling program is the reason for the decline in the purchase of the burglar alarms.

Pre-thinking - If people feel that police patrolling program will help better in decreasing burglary then that could be one of the reasons for not buying the alarms anymore. The important thing to note here is that it is the perception that has changed! This does not necessarily mean that Police Patrolling system is better than alarms!


The argument above assumes that

A. new police patrolling program is effective in controlling burglaries [But what if alarms are more effective? This option does not bring about the assumption that the people have in mind while not buying alarms - Irrelevant option - Hence discarded]

B. most people supported the new police patrolling program [Even if they don't support it, it does not matter. Because some they might still consider it to be better than the alarms.]
C. people's perception of the threat of burglaries decreased because of the new police patrolling program [If the perception of threat decreases, that automatically means that people don't feel the need of alarms! This is the CORRECT answer]

D. people trust the police patrolling vehicles more than they trust burglar alarms. [Even if the trust it equally, that could be reason enough for them to stop spending money on alarms - Thus this can't be the assumption]

E. people have formed an opinion that even the most advanced burglar alarms cannot help prevent robberies because the burglars have become more technologically advanced.[Out of Scope - The police factor does not come into picture here and we are given an alternate reason for not using the alarm.]
_________________

Work Hard! Have Fun! Create History! :)

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 25

Re: Prior to the new poice patrolling program, which requires police cars   [#permalink] 20 Sep 2017, 01:11
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Prior to the new poice patrolling program, which requires police cars

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.