Boil it down:
Supporters provide justification for an action.
BUT there is a drawback of the action.
The information given, if true,
most strongly supports which of the following?
(A)
The market for luxury boats would have collapsed even if the new tax on luxury boats had been lower – Irrelevant
(B) The new tax would produce a net gain in tax revenue for the government only if the yearly total revenue that it generates exceeds the total of any yearly tax-revenue decrease resulting from the workers' loss of jobs – Correct answer – Though it contains drama 😉 (C) Because
many people never buy luxury items, imposing a sales tax on luxury items is the kind of
legislative action that does not cost
incumbent legislators much popular
support -Irrelevant
(D)
Before the tax was instituted, luxury boats were largely bought by people who were not wealthy – Irrelevant as we can’t conclude this statement from the above passage
(E)
Taxes can be equitable only if their burden is evenly distributed over the entire population – Irrelevant – it is more like a claim, BUT we are searching for possible conclusions