GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

 It is currently 16 Feb 2020, 13:20 ### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

#### Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.  # Set S consists of more than two integers. Are all the numbers in set S

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern  Joined: 01 May 2013
Posts: 1
Set S consists of more than two integers. Are all the numbers in set S  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

2
21 00:00

Difficulty:   95% (hard)

Question Stats: 34% (02:04) correct 66% (01:45) wrong based on 267 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Set S consists of more than two integers. Are all the numbers in set S negative?

(1) The product of any three integers in the list is negative
(2) The product of the smallest and largest integers in the list is a prime number.
VP  Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1002
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Re: Set S consists of more than two integers. Are all the numbers in set S  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

5
4
Set S consists of more than two integers. Are all the numbers in set S negative?

(1) The product of any three integers in the list is negative
Case {-1,1,2} no negative.
Case {-3,-2,-1} all negative.
Not sufficient

(2) The product of the smallest and largest integers in the list is a prime number.
So their product is positive
Case {1,2,3} no negative.
Case {-3,-2,-1} all negative.
Not sufficient

(1)+(2) From 2 we get that the smallest and the largest have the same sign. From one we get that the product of any three integers is negative, so every number is negative.
If just one is positive than the product of -*-*+ would be + and statement one would not hold true.
C
##### General Discussion
Retired Moderator P
Joined: 21 Aug 2013
Posts: 1387
Location: India
Re: Set S consists of more than two integers. Are all the numbers in set S  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

1
1
ZArslan wrote:
24. Set S consists of more than two integers. Are all the numbers in set S negative?

(1) The product of any three integers in the list is negative
(2) The product of the smallest and largest integers in the list is a prime number.

So Set S can have three or more integers.

(1) Product of any three integers is negative. Now if set S has only three integers, then the product of 'any three integers' means product of these three integers only. And if product of these three integers is negative, it could mean either that all three are negative Or only one of them is negative. So this is giving us two different possibilities, and so Insufficient.
If instead set has more than three integers (say four or five or hundred whatever), then for product of 'any three integers' to be negative it would only be possible if ALL the integers in set are negative.
So from this statement, we get that if set S has exactly three integers - then either all are negative or only one is negative. But if set S has more than three integers, then all must be negative. Not Sufficient.

(2) Prime numbers are always positive. So if we arrange the integers of set S in say ascending order, the product of smallest (first integer) and largest (last integer) is coming out to be positive. This can happen if both smallest and largest integers are negative (in which case all integers will be negative) Or if both smallest and largest integers are positive (in which case all integers will be positive).
So from this statement, we get that either all integers in set S are negative or all integers in set S are positive. Not Sufficient.

Combining both, whether it be a set with exactly three integers or more than three integers - from second statement we know that either all integers in set S are negative or all integers in set S are positive. But if all integers become positive, then product of 'any three integers' will NEVER be negative, it will be positive and will violate the first statement. So we are left with only one case - that all integers in set S are negative. Sufficient.

Math Expert V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 61189
Re: Set S consists of more than two integers. Are all the numbers in set S  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

2
1
ZArslan wrote:
Set S consists of more than two integers. Are all the numbers in set S negative?

(1) The product of any three integers in the list is negative
(2) The product of the smallest and largest integers in the list is a prime number.

Set S consists of more than two integers. Are all the integers in set S negative?

(1) The product of any three integers in the set is negative. If the set consists of only 3 terms, then the set could be either {negative, negative, negative} or {negative, positive, positive}. If the set consists of more than 3 terms, then the set can only have negative numbers. Not sufficient.

(2) The product of the smallest and largest integers in the set is a prime number. Since only positive numbers can be primes, then the smallest and largest integers in the set must be of the same sign. Thus the set consists of only negative or only positive integers. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Since the second statement rules out {negative, positive, positive} case which we had from (1), then we have that the set must have only negative integers. Sufficient.

_________________
Intern  S
Joined: 05 Jan 2017
Posts: 33
Re: Set S consists of more than two integers. Are all the numbers in set S  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

I have a silly question.
Why case (+, - ,+) is not considered here?
For ex- from 1 and 2
Apart from (-, - , -) which is discussed above, If we take (1,-4, 3) as an example, then also we are getting the desired result.
So I marked the answer as E.
Plz someone clarify my doubt.
Senior PS Moderator V
Joined: 26 Feb 2016
Posts: 3272
Location: India
GPA: 3.12
Re: Set S consists of more than two integers. Are all the numbers in set S  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

_shashank_shekhar_ wrote:
I have a silly question.
Why case (+, - ,+) is not considered here?
For ex- from 1 and 2
Apart from (-, - , -) which is discussed above, If we take (1,-4, 3) as an example, then also we are getting the desired result.
So I marked the answer as E.
Plz someone clarify my doubt.

Hi _shashank_shekhar_

The case you have taken is not possible because the product of the smallest
and largest number must be a prime number as per statement 2.
In the example you have taken, the product will be -12 which is not prime.

Hope that helps you!
_________________
You've got what it takes, but it will take everything you've got
Intern  S
Joined: 05 Jan 2017
Posts: 33
Re: Set S consists of more than two integers. Are all the numbers in set S  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

pushpitkc wrote:
_shashank_shekhar_ wrote:
I have a silly question.
Why case (+, - ,+) is not considered here?
For ex- from 1 and 2
Apart from (-, - , -) which is discussed above, If we take (1,-4, 3) as an example, then also we are getting the desired result.
So I marked the answer as E.
Plz someone clarify my doubt.

Hi _shashank_shekhar_

The case you have taken is not possible because the product of the smallest
and largest number must be a prime number as per statement 2.
In the example you have taken, the product will be -12 which is not prime.

Hope that helps you!
Oh yess... I dont know what i was thinking.

Thanks a lot.. got it now. Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
GMAT Club Legend  V
Joined: 11 Sep 2015
Posts: 4318
Re: Set S consists of more than two integers. Are all the numbers in set S  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

1
Top Contributor
ZArslan wrote:
Set S consists of more than two integers. Are all the numbers in set S negative?

(1) The product of any three integers in the list is negative
(2) The product of the smallest and largest integers in the list is a prime number.

Target question: Are all the numbers in set S negative?

Statement 1: The product of any three integers in the list is negative
There are only 2 scenarios in which the product of 3 integers is negative.
scenario #1: all 3 integers are negative
scenario #2: 2 integers are positive, and 1 integer is negative

So, here are two possible cases that satisfy statement 1:
Case a: set S = {-3, -2, -1}, in which case all of the numbers in set S are negative
Case b: set S = {-1, 1, 3}, in which case not all of the numbers in set S are negative
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: The product of the smallest and largest integers in the list is a prime number.
Here are two possible cases that satisfy statement 2:
Case a: set S = {-3, -2, -1}, in which case all of the numbers in set S are negative
Case b: set S = {1, 2, 3}, in which case not all of the numbers in set S are negative
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
Earlier, we learned that, if the product of 3 integers is negative, then there are 2 possible scenarios:
- scenario #1: all 3 integers are negative
- scenario #2: 2 integers are positive, and 1 integer is negative

Statement 2 tells us that the product of the smallest and largest integers in the list is a prime number. In other word, the product of the smallest and largest integers is POSITIVE.
This allows us to eliminate scenario #2, because under this scenario, the smallest integer in set S would be negative and the largest would be positive, so the product would be NEGATIVE (and prime numbers, by definition, are positive)

This leaves us with scenario #1.
From here, we can conclude that, if the product of any three integers is ALWAYS negative, then ALL of the integers in the set must be negative.
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT

Cheers,
Brent
_________________
Intern  B
Joined: 27 Apr 2019
Posts: 7
Re: Set S consists of more than two integers. Are all the numbers in set S  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

but it doesn't specify that all the #'s in S must be integers.

what about set {-7, -3, -1, .2}

This technically complies with both statements (1) and (2), a bit misleading given that the question asks about whether all numbers are negative.
VP  P
Joined: 24 Nov 2016
Posts: 1200
Location: United States
Re: Set S consists of more than two integers. Are all the numbers in set S  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

ZArslan wrote:
Set S consists of more than two integers. Are all the numbers in set S negative?

(1) The product of any three integers in the list is negative
(2) The product of the smallest and largest integers in the list is a prime number.

set {n > 2 integers}

(1) The product of any three integers in the list is negative: insufic.
[A] {-1,-1,-1}=-1 all neg
[B] {-1,2,3}=-6 not all neg

(2) The product of the smallest and largest integers in the list is a prime number; insufic.
[A] (smallest*largest)=-13*-1=13=prime and the set: {-13…-1} all neg
[B] (smallest*largest)=1*5=5=prime and the set: {1…5} not all neg

(1&2) numbers in set must have same sign, so case (1)[B] is not valid, thus all are negative, sufic. Re: Set S consists of more than two integers. Are all the numbers in set S   [#permalink] 22 Sep 2019, 10:33
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Set S consists of more than two integers. Are all the numbers in set S  