GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 18 Aug 2018, 23:13

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Everyone is a leader. Just stop listening to others.
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 871
Location: India
GPA: 3.51
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jul 2014, 13:13
2
A has pronoun error.
B is fine.
Use of Present perfect for action finished in the past is not right. Thus C is wrong.
In D and E which is incorrectly used.
_________________

Piyush K
-----------------------
Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is to try just one more time. ― Thomas A. Edison
Don't forget to press--> Kudos :)
My Articles: 1. WOULD: when to use? | 2. All GMATPrep RCs (New)
Tip: Before exam a week earlier don't forget to exhaust all gmatprep problems specially for "sentence correction".

Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Everyone is a leader. Just stop listening to others.
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 871
Location: India
GPA: 3.51
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jul 2014, 06:22
1
kassim wrote:
PiyushK wrote:
A has pronoun error.
B is fine.
Use of Present perfect for action finished in the past is not right. Thus C is wrong.
In D and E which is incorrectly used.


Hi,
In "B" aren't we comparing costs to the previous campaign?

Kassim,


Hi Kassim,

Preposition "in" is making comparison fine.

X was higherin the presidential campaign of 1992 || than X (was) in any previous election.
_________________

Piyush K
-----------------------
Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is to try just one more time. ― Thomas A. Edison
Don't forget to press--> Kudos :)
My Articles: 1. WOULD: when to use? | 2. All GMATPrep RCs (New)
Tip: Before exam a week earlier don't forget to exhaust all gmatprep problems specially for "sentence correction".

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Jan 2008
Posts: 16
Re: Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jul 2014, 06:42
1
1
I believe A has redundancy issue too.B is concise and gives correct comparison."Soaring television costs" is singular,thus C is wrong.In D and E,which incorrectly points to presidential campaigns of 1992 and not to the costs.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 01 Jul 2014
Posts: 27
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.2
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Sep 2016, 00:19
(a) a greater proportion than it was --> Intended meaning: The proportion(in the presidential campaign of 1992) was greater than proportion in any previous election. "It" has no referent as per the intended meaning
(b) a greater proportion than --> Correct, conveys intended meaning
(c) a greater proportion than they have been --> "they" can refer to "soaring television costs" ==> Illogical meaning
(d) which is greater than was so --> "which" cannot modify the preceding clause. "which" can modify preceding noun entity
(e) which is greater than it has been --> i)Same Error as in D ii) "It" has no referrent
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 01 Jun 2015
Posts: 230
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V26
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jun 2017, 10:15
I have two specific question on this one
1.What is exactly being compared in B?
2.What is wrong with option C?
Retired Moderator
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3188
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jun 2017, 02:31
techiesam wrote:
I have two specific question on this one
1.What is exactly being compared in B?
2.What is wrong with option C?


1. Objects compared:
A. The proportion of television costs in presidential spending in 1992 (Proportion = more than 1/2)
B. The proportion of television costs in presidential spending in any election before 1992

2. "They" refers to "television costs". Television costs are not compared - the proportion of the television costs is compared. So the pronoun should be "it", not "they".
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 01 Jun 2015
Posts: 230
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V26
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jun 2017, 08:36
sayantanc2k wrote:
techiesam wrote:
I have two specific question on this one
1.What is exactly being compared in B?
2.What is wrong with option C?


1. Objects compared:
A. The proportion of television costs in presidential spending in 1992 (Proportion = more than 1/2)
B. The proportion of television costs in presidential spending in any election before 1992

2. "They" refers to "television costs". Television costs are not compared - the proportion of the television costs is compared. So the pronoun should be "it", not "they".


If the pronoun should be it then why A is wrong? Is that because the verb was?
Board of Directors
User avatar
V
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3692
Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jun 2017, 08:45
techiesam wrote:
If the pronoun should be it then why A is wrong? Is that because the verb was?


Hi techiesam ,

I think you misunderstood what sayantanc2k tried to convey.

He meant "they" cannot be used to compare the proportion. Proportion can be compared using "it".

But in A, this "it" can refer to two things: proportion or campaign. So, it has pronoun ambiguity error and hence incorrect.

Had the sentence been something like below, it would have been correct.

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

Did you notice "it" here has only one antecedent. Hence, correct.

I hope it makes sense. :)
_________________

My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place
Blog: Subscribe to Question of the Day Blog

GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.

New! Best Reply Functionality on GMAT Club!



Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free

Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 01 Jun 2015
Posts: 230
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V26
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jun 2017, 08:53
abhimahna wrote:
techiesam wrote:
If the pronoun should be it then why A is wrong? Is that because the verb was?


Hi techiesam ,

I think you misunderstood what sayantanc2k tried to convey.

He meant "they" cannot be used to compare the proportion. Proportion can be compared using "it".

But in A, this "it" can refer to two things: proportion or campaign. So, it has pronoun ambiguity error and hence incorrect.

Had the sentence been something like below, it would have been correct.

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

Did you notice "it" here has only one antecedent. Hence, correct.

I hope it makes sense. :)


Thank you
My initial thought was that "spending" of different timeline was compared.By the way,in the sentence written by you,doesn't spending also qualify as a contender for it as spending is a noun?
Board of Directors
User avatar
V
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3692
Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jun 2017, 09:06
techiesam wrote:
Thank you
My initial thought was that "spending" of different timeline was compared.By the way,in the sentence written by you,doesn't spending also qualify as a contender for it as spending is a noun?


Hi techiesam ,

Yes, it does. But note that the proportion is also referring to the spending only. So, either way we are referring to spending by using "it".

This type of pronoun reference is acceptable on GMAT.

I hope it makes sense. :)
_________________

My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place
Blog: Subscribe to Question of the Day Blog

GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.

New! Best Reply Functionality on GMAT Club!



Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free

Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 655
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Aug 2017, 06:16
We can eliminate D and E for using the relative pronoun "which" because it's not 1992 that is "greater than..."

C can be eliminated for using the present perfect "have been" to describe past elections.

A uses "it was." What was a greater proportion than in any previous election? Soaring TV costs. Costs are plural and "it was" is singular, so we have an agreement error.

Subject :- soaring television costs(Plural). So, The choices using singular pronoun or verb such as "it" in A, "was so" in D and greater than "it" has in E are out.

A. a greater proportion than it was
This sentence has pronoun reference error. The pronoun "it" can only refer to "spending in the presidential campaign" or to "presidential campaign". Both these references are non-sensical in the context of this sentence.

B. a greater proportion than
This option compares spending over two election periods. Correct.

C. a greater proportion than they have been
The only plural referent for "they' is "soaring television costs". This will result in is an illogical comparison.

D. which is greater than was so
The reference made by "which modifier" is not clear. Is "which" referring to "presidential campaign of 1992" or spending in presidential campaign of 1992" or so on. Thus, use of which modifier is ambiguous.

E. which is greater than it has been
Same as D.
_________________

Thanks & Regards,
Anaira Mitch

Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 25 Jul 2017
Posts: 96
Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 28 Jul 2018, 19:28
2
Explanation: “Soaring television costs” is the subject, and it is plural. So, A (it & was), D ( was), and E (has been) are out.
“C” is out as “they have been” seems to suggest that what happened in 1992 is still continuing, which is not right as this phenomenon is ended in 1992, and there is no reason to believe that this is continuing right now.

B is the Answer.

Originally posted by anuj04 on 26 Mar 2018, 22:09.
Last edited by anuj04 on 28 Jul 2018, 19:28, edited 1 time in total.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Dec 2017
Posts: 453
Re: Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jun 2018, 09:22
Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

(A) a greater proportion than it was

(B) a greater proportion than

(C) a greater proportion than they have been

(D) which is greater than was so

(E) which is greater than it has been


Answer B.


Thanks,
GyM
Re: Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending &nbs [#permalink] 25 Jun 2018, 09:22

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 34 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.