Social scientists have traditionally defined multipolar international

Question

Social scientists have traditionally defined
multipolar international systems as consisting of three
or more nations, each of roughly equal military and
economic strength. Theoretically, the members of such
  (5)   systems create shifting, temporary alliances in response
to changing circumstances in the international
environment. Such systems are, thus, fluid and flexible.
Frequent, small confrontations are one attribute of
multipolar systems and are usually the result of less
  (10)   powerful members grouping together to counter
threats from larger, more aggressive members seeking
hegemony. Yet the constant and inevitable
counterbalancing typical of such systems usually
results in stability. The best-known example of a
  (15)   multipolar system is the Concert of Europe, which
coincided with general peace on that continent lasting
roughly 100 years beginning around 1815.

Bipolar systems, on the other hand, involve two
major members of roughly equal military and
  (20)   economic strength vying for power and advantage.
Other members of lesser strength tend to coalesce
around one or the other pole. Such systems tend to be
rigid and fixed, in part due to the existence of only one
axis of power. Zero-sum political and military
  (25)   maneuverings, in which a gain for one side results in
an equivalent loss for the other, are a salient feature of
bipolar systems. Overall superiority is sought by both
major members, which can lead to frequent
confrontations, debilitating armed conflict, and,
  (30)   eventually, to the capitulation of one or the other side.
Athens and Sparta of ancient Greece had a bipolar
relationship, as did the United States and the USSR
during the Cold War.

However, the shift in the geopolitical landscape
  (35)   following the end of the Cold War calls for a
reassessment of the assumptions underlying these two
theoretical concepts. The emerging but still vague
multipolar system in Europe today brings with it the
unsettling prospect of new conflicts and shifting
  (40)   alliances that may lead to a diminution, rather than an
enhancement, of security. The frequent, small
confrontations that are thought to have kept the
Concert of Europe in a state of equilibrium would
today, as nations arm themselves with modern
  (45)   weapons, create instability that could destroy the
system. And the larger number of members and
shifting alliance patterns peculiar to multipolar systems
would create a bewildering tangle of conflicts.

This reassessment may also lead us to look at the
  (50)   Cold War in a new light. In 1914 smaller members of
the multipolar system in Europe brought the larger
members into a war that engulfed the continent. The
aftermath—a crippled system in which certain
members were dismantled, punished, or voluntarily
  (55)   withdrew—created the conditions that led to World
War II. In contrast, the principal attributes of bipolar
systems—two major members with only one possible
axis of conflict locked in a rigid yet usually stable
struggle for power—may have created the necessary
  (60)   parameters for general peace in the second half of the 
twentieth century.    1 
 1. Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?

(A) Peace can be maintained in Europe only if a new bipolar system emerges to replace Cold War alliances.
(B) All kinds of international systems discussed by social scientists carry within themselves the seeds of their own collapse and ultimately endanger international order.
(C) The current European geopolitical landscape is a multipolar system that strongly resembles the Concert of Europe which existed through most of the nineteenth century.
(D) Multipolarity fostered the conditions that led to World War II and is incompatible with a stable, modern Europe.
(E) The characterization of multipolar systems as stable and bipolar systems as open to debilitating conflict needs to be reconsidered in light of the realities of post-Cold War Europe.

2 
 2. Which one of the following statements most accurately describes the function of the final paragraph?

(A) The weaknesses of both types of systems are discussed in the context of twentieth-century European history.
(B) A prediction is made regarding European security based on the attributes of both types of systems.
(C) A new argument is introduced in favor of European countries embracing a new bipolar system.
(D) Twentieth-century European history is used to expand on the argument in the previous paragraph.
(E) The typical characteristics of the major members of a bipolar system are reviewed.

3 
 3. The author’s reference to the possibility that confrontations may lead to capitulation (lines 27–30) serves primarily to

(A) indicate that bipolar systems can have certain unstable characteristics
(B) illustrate how multipolar systems can transform themselves into bipolar systems
(C) contrast the aggressive nature of bipolar members with the more rational behavior of their multipolar counterparts
(D) indicate the anarchic nature of international relations
(E) suggest that military and economic strength shifts in bipolar as frequently as in multipolar systems

4 
 4. With respect to the Cold War, the author’s attitude can most accurately be described as

(A) fearful that European geopolitics may bring about a similar bipolar system
(B) surprised that it did not end with a major war
(C) convinced that it provides an important example of bipolarity maintaining peace
(D) regretful that the major European countries were so ambivalent about it
(E) confident it will mark only a brief hiatus between long periods of European multipolarity

5 
 5. Which one of the following statements concerning the Concert of Europe (lines 14–17) can most reasonably be inferred from the passage?

(A) Each of the many small confrontations that occurred under the Concert of Europe threatened the integrity of the system.
(B) It provided the highest level of security possible for Europe in the late nineteenth century.
(C) All the factors contributing to stability during the late nineteenth century continue to contribute to European security.
(D) Equilibrium in the system was maintained as members grouped together to counterbalance mutual threats.
(E) It was more stable than most multipolar systems because its smaller members reacted promptly to aggression by its larger members.

Source:   LSAT Official PrepTest 40   
 Difficulty Level:   600

RC Butler 2021  -  Practice Two RC Questions Everyday.   
Passage # 251 Date: 25-Jun-2021
 This question is a part of RC Butler 2021 .  Click here for Details

ShubhamPatil · Answer

Loved the passage! It has a good mix of concept and it's contradiction; hence making the understanding of passage so critical.

Sajjad1994  can you please help me with explanation for Q5. I was stuck between option A and D as both are mentioned in the passage in different context.

PyjamaScientist · Answer

ShubhamPatil  If you look at the first paragraph below, you will see that it mentions "stability resulting from the counterbalancing typical of multipolar systems.

Option A says that small confrontations within the Concert of E threatened the integrity of the system. Which part of the passage hints towards this? 
 
This closely parallels our understanding of the first paragraph. The main purpose of the multipolar system was to provide security against the bigger (more stronger) mutual threats. And the mention of Concert of Europe as the Best Example of Multipolar system is to further strengthen the concept of multipolar system with reference to peace in Europe from 1815-1915. So, Option E can be deduced logically from it.

I hope this helped you clear your doubt between A and D.

Makhabbat · Answer

Hello! What about 3rd? 33% (including me) chose C. Please help)

Sajjad1994 · Answer

Explanation

3. The author’s reference to the possibility that confrontations may lead to capitulation (lines 27–30) serves primarily to

Difficulty Level:   600

Explanation

The question stem asks us about  lines 27-30.  The second paragraph serves to discuss the traditional view of bipolar systems. Thus, the author’s reference must be a way for him to describe some salient feature of bipolar systems.

We can begin by eliminating  (B), (C),  and  (E)  as they bring in multipolar systems. The author isn’t concerned with a line-by-line comparison between multipolar and bipolar systems in this paragraph. He simply lays out the traditional view of bipolar systems.

We can then eliminate  (D)  because the  “nature of international relations”  is too broad to be within the scope of this passage. The author doesn’t discuss the entire nature of all international relations, just two types of systems for those relations.

The remaining choice,  (A) , is correct. The line reference in the question stem includes  “salient feature of bipolar systems”  which corresponds to  “characteristics”  in the question stem. The reference also includes  “frequent confrontations, debilitating armed conflict, and, eventually, the capitulation of one or the other side”  which corresponds to  “unstable”  in the question stem.

Answer: A

AkankshaUniyal · Answer

Please explain question 4

Sajjad1994 · Answer

Explanation

4. With respect to the Cold War, the author’s attitude can most accurately be described as

Difficulty Level:   Medium

Explanation

You should begin Author’s Attitude questions by identifying where in the text the author clearly states his or her opinion. Then determine whether the author is generally positive or negative as a way to eliminate several wrong answer choices quickly.

The question stem asks us to consider the author’s attitude towards the Cold War. His opinions are stated in the final paragraph, in which he extends his reassessment of bipolar and multipolar systems to the Cold War. We see there that he thinks it  “created the necessary parameters for general peace”.  That phrase matches well with  choice (C).

(A) —the author is somewhat positive about the bipolar system of the Cold War, insofar as he says that it contributed to stability.  “Fearful”  is thus out.
 
 (B) — “created the parameters for general peace”  hardly sounds like  “surprised that it did not end with a major war”.

(D)  uses the term  “regretful,”  which injects far more emotion into the passage than is there. The author writes in a dry, scholarly tone the entire time.

(E)  talks about what  “will”  happen, and is inappropriate because the author’s consideration of the Cold War in the final paragraph doesn’t concern itself with the future.

Answer: C

Social scientists have traditionally defined multipolar international

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Reading Comprehension (RC) Questions

Social scientists have traditionally defined multipolar international

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards