Last visit was: 27 Jul 2024, 06:02 It is currently 27 Jul 2024, 06:02
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 May 2014
Posts: 23
Own Kudos [?]: 112 [5]
Given Kudos: 5
Send PM
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 4559
Own Kudos [?]: 33666 [0]
Given Kudos: 4581
Send PM
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 Mar 2014
Posts: 16
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 16
Send PM
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 78
Own Kudos [?]: 204 [1]
Given Kudos: 101
Send PM
The government’s design for the new cross-state bridge [#permalink]
1
Kudos
SaudKhan wrote:
y not C ??
and can you please explain y the OA is D ???


Analysts concluded that the bid would only just cover Sherwin & Co's costs on the paint, but Sherwin & Co executives claim that winning the bid will actually make a profit for the company.
the correct answer choice must reconcile this paradox and let these two facts coexist.

(C)The manufacturing facilities for the Plexico Bridge components and those for the specialized coating to be supplied by Sherwin & Co are located very near each other.
this fact that the manufacturing facilities of the Plexico Bridge components and those for the specialized coating are located very near does not explain how they can make profit.
maybe you perceived this fact can help in lowering such sort of costs as transportation. but it does not explain how this proximity location can make profit!

but in option D)When bridge owners need to repaint a worn-out bridge due to time and corrosion, they almost invariably repaint it with a coating of exactly the same make and type from the same supplier.
it says that maybe on the first round of painting what they earn would only just cover Sherwin & Co's costs , but on the next time when they want to renew coating they will actually make a profit.
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Nov 2012
Posts: 155
Own Kudos [?]: 138 [0]
Given Kudos: 126
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
Schools: ISB '18 (A)
GPA: 2.7
WE:Analyst (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: The government’s design for the new cross-state bridge [#permalink]
bb61 wrote:
SaudKhan wrote:
y not C ??
and can you please explain y the OA is D ???


Analysts concluded that the bid would only just cover Sherwin & Co's costs on the paint, but Sherwin & Co executives claim that winning the bid will actually make a profit for the company.
the correct answer choice must reconcile this paradox and let these two facts coexist.

(C)The manufacturing facilities for the Plexico Bridge components and those for the specialized coating to be supplied by Sherwin & Co are located very near each other.
this fact that the manufacturing facilities of the Plexico Bridge components and those for the specialized coating are located very near does not explain how they can make profit.
maybe you perceived this fact can help in lowering such sort of costs as transportation. but it does not explain how this proximity location can make profit!

but in option D)When bridge owners need to repaint a worn-out bridge due to time and corrosion, they almost invariably repaint it with a coating of exactly the same make and type from the same supplier.
it says that maybe on the first round of painting what they earn would only just cover Sherwin & Co's costs , but on the next time when they want to renew coating they will actually make a profit.


Hi,
Though i perceive D to be better than other options I still have my concerns for this option. Lt us take an e.g
Sherwin & co produces 1bucket paint @ 100$ (selling price). Let the cost to produce 1bucket of paint = 90$. Let other miscellaneous setup costs add utp 10$. So essentially, the first time the paint is sold there is no profit for sherwin & co ( sp- cp -miscll costs= 100 -90 -10 =0 ). But from next time onwards these miscllaneous setup costs would not be there and therefore Sherwin & co can earn a profit of 100$ - 90$ =10$ everytime . Please tell me whether my understanding is correct or not.
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 78
Own Kudos [?]: 204 [0]
Given Kudos: 101
Send PM
Re: The government’s design for the new cross-state bridge [#permalink]
mshrek wrote:
Hi,
Though i perceive D to be better than other options I still have my concerns for this option. Lt us take an e.g
Sherwin & co produces 1bucket paint @ 100$ (selling price). Let the cost to produce 1bucket of paint = 90$. Let other miscellaneous setup costs add utp 10$. So essentially, the first time the paint is sold there is no profit for sherwin & co ( sp- cp -miscll costs= 100 -90 -10 =0 ). But from next time onwards these miscllaneous setup costs would not be there and therefore Sherwin & co can earn a profit of 100$ - 90$ =10$ everytime . Please tell me whether my understanding is correct or not.


I think you are making an assumption that the company cannot raise its price for the next round.
but in option D the only limitation is that "they almost invariably repaint it with a coating of exactly the same make and type from the same supplier" but not the second time price. maybe the supplier can charge higher when they know they are the sole provider for their customer.
in this case if you change 100 to 150 then it will make sense.
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Nov 2012
Posts: 155
Own Kudos [?]: 138 [1]
Given Kudos: 126
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
Schools: ISB '18 (A)
GPA: 2.7
WE:Analyst (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: The government’s design for the new cross-state bridge [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
bb61 wrote:
mshrek wrote:
Hi,
Though i perceive D to be better than other options I still have my concerns for this option. Lt us take an e.g
Sherwin & co produces 1bucket paint @ 100$ (selling price). Let the cost to produce 1bucket of paint = 90$. Let other miscellaneous setup costs add utp 10$. So essentially, the first time the paint is sold there is no profit for sherwin & co ( sp- cp -miscll costs= 100 -90 -10 =0 ). But from next time onwards these miscllaneous setup costs would not be there and therefore Sherwin & co can earn a profit of 100$ - 90$ =10$ everytime . Please tell me whether my understanding is correct or not.


I think you are making an assumption that the company cannot raise its price for the next round.
but in option D the only limitation is that "they almost invariably repaint it with a coating of exactly the same make and type from the same supplier" but not the second time price. maybe the supplier can charge higher when they know they are the sole provider for their customer.
in this case if you change 100 to 150 then it will make sense.


Yes. That was an assumption I made. Thanks for the clarification. Option D makes more sense to me now
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Dec 2014
Posts: 304
Own Kudos [?]: 305 [0]
Given Kudos: 353
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: General Management, Economics
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
WE:Sales (Telecommunications)
Send PM
Re: The government’s design for the new cross-state bridge [#permalink]
This question is a "copy" of this one the-maxilux-car-company-s-design-for-its-new-luxury-model-136971.html . Even the answer is D too=))
Manager
Manager
Joined: 31 May 2015
Posts: 212
Own Kudos [?]: 196 [0]
Given Kudos: 220
Location: Fiji
Schools: IE
GPA: 1
Send PM
Re: The government’s design for the new cross-state bridge [#permalink]
Why not A?..they could make up the lost man hours on the bridge by adding them onto the ramp...I am not certain what ramp structure is...
Manager
Manager
Joined: 20 Feb 2017
Posts: 75
Own Kudos [?]: 103 [0]
Given Kudos: 84
Location: United States
Send PM
The government’s design for the new cross-state bridge [#permalink]
sony1000 wrote:
Why not A?..they could make up the lost man-hours on the bridge by adding them onto the ramp...I am not certain what ramp structure is...


A Ramp is part of another road joining the bridge. (Though it is not important to answer the question).

I am not sure what you mean by lost man-hours. All that option A is saying that Ramp will have the same coating as the bridge.
So Company will have some additional road to apply the coating, this information doesn't help to explain company claim.

We can explain the company claim if the company is expecting a long-term sale as result of this contract.
Attachments

Bridge Ramp.png
Bridge Ramp.png [ 2.66 MiB | Viewed 4251 times ]

Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Aug 2023
Posts: 85
Own Kudos [?]: 51 [0]
Given Kudos: 58
Send PM
Re: The governments design for the new cross-state bridge [#permalink]
Can someone please help eliminate B?
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 2703
Own Kudos [?]: 7864 [2]
Given Kudos: 56
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Send PM
Re: The governments design for the new cross-state bridge [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
This is a really good example of why it's best to study from official problems. As Konstantin1983 points out above, this problem is copied from a question about tires. The key detail that the rewriter failed to notice is that the new tires involved a "special design" specific to that model. The mention of a "special reflective coating," without the mention of a product-specific design, makes it less clear that the vendor is incurring an up-front design cost that will not appear again as a cost when it comes time for reorders. As written, the problem may seem to require an assumption about these up-front costs, but that is clearly the intent behind the original question: the company breaks even on the initial supply and earns a profit on reorders.

As for B, it doesn't give us any indication that the other contracts are a result of winning this particular bid. Those other contracts may be lucrative (or not), but they don't explain why winning THIS particular contract would be profitable for the vendor.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The governments design for the new cross-state bridge [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6985 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
236 posts
CR Forum Moderator
824 posts