GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 18 Oct 2018, 15:25

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The professionalization of the study of history in the second half of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 241
The professionalization of the study of history in the second half of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 02 Oct 2017, 17:14
5
10
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 563 sessions

70% (03:03) correct 30% (02:38) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 530 sessions

53% (01:27) correct 47% (01:42) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 506 sessions

77% (01:11) correct 23% (01:16) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

The professionalization of the study of history in the second half of the nineteenth century, including history's transformation from a literary genre to a scientific discipline, had important consequences not only for historians' perceptions of women but also for women as historians. The disappearance of women as objects of historical studies during this period has elements of irony to it. On the one hand, in writing about women, earlier historians had relied not on firsthand sources but rather on secondary sources; the shift to more rigorous research methods required that secondary sources be disregarded. On the other hand, the development of archival research and the critical editing of collections of documents began to reveal significant new historical evidence concerning women, yet this evidence was perceived as substantially irrelevant: historians saw political history as the general framework for historical writing. Because women were seen as belonging to the private rather than to the public sphere, the discovery of documents about them, or by them, did not, by itself, produce history acknowledging the contributions of women. In addition, genres such as biography and memoir, those forms of "particular history" that women had traditionally authored, fell into disrepute. The dividing line between "particular history" and general history was redefined in stronger terms, widening the gulf between amateur and professional practices of historical research.
1. The passage is primarily concerned with

(A) describing some effects of the professionalization of the study of history on the writing of women's history
(B) explaining some reasons for the professionalization of the writing of history
(C) discussing the kinds of historical writing traditionally practiced by women
(D) contrasting the approach to the writing of history taken by women with the approach taken by men
(E) criticizing certain changes that occurred in the writing of history during the second half of the nineteenth century



2. Which of the following best describes one of the "elements of irony" referred to in the highlighted text?

(A) Although the more scientific-minded historians of the second half of the nineteenth century considered women appropriate subjects for historical writing, earlier historians did not.
(B) Although archival research uncovered documentary evidence of women's role in history, historians continued to rely on secondary sources for information about women.
(C) Although historians were primarily concerned with writing about the public sphere, they generally relegated women to the private sphere.
(D) The scientific approach to history revealed more information about women, but that information was ignored.
(E) The professionalization of history, while marginalizing much of women's writing about history, enhanced the importance of women as historical subjects.



3. According to the passage, the development of archival research and the critical editing of collections of documents had which of the following effects?

(A) Historians increasingly acknowledged women's contributions to history.
(B) Historians began to debate whether secondary sources could provide reliable information.
(C) Historians began to apply less rigorous scientific research criteria to the study of women's history.
(D) More evidence concerning women became available to historical researchers.
(E) Women began to study history as professional historians.



Originally posted by eybrj2 on 31 May 2012, 20:58.
Last edited by hazelnut on 02 Oct 2017, 17:14, edited 1 time in total.
Edited the question.
Most Helpful Community Reply
Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Everyone is a leader. Just stop listening to others.
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 796
Location: India
GPA: 3.51
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
The professionalization of the study of history in the second half of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 05 May 2018, 01:49
2
9
NEW PROJECT!: Back to basic => Give your explanation- Get Kudos Point for best explanation

Passage-18 GMATPrep RCs-Collection(Main article)

The professionalization of the study of history in the second half of the nineteenth century, including history's transformation from a literary genre to a scientific discipline, had important consequences not only for historians' perceptions of women but also for women as historians. The disappearance of women as objects of historical studies during this period has elements of irony to it. On the one hand, in writing about women, earlier historians had relied not on firsthand sources but rather on secondary sources; the shift to more rigorous research methods required that secondary sources be disregarded. On the other hand, the development of archival research and the critical editing of collections of documents began to reveal significant new historical evidence concerning women, yet this evidence was perceived as substantially irrelevant: historians saw political history as the general framework for historical writing. Because women were seen as belonging to the private rather than to the public sphere, the discovery of documents about them, or by them, did not, by itself, produce history acknowledging the contributions of women. In addition, genres such as biography and memoir, those forms of "particular history" that women had traditionally authored, fell into disrepute. The dividing line between "particular history" and general history was redefined in stronger terms, widening the gulf between amateur and professional practices of historical research.
1. The passage is primarily concerned with
A. describing some effects of the professionalization of the study of history on the writing of women's history
B. explaining some reasons for the professionalization of the writing of history
C. discussing the kinds of historical writing traditionally practiced by women
D. contrasting the approach to the writing of history taken by women with the approach taken by men
E. criticizing certain changes that occurred in the writing of history during the second half of the nineteenth century



2. Which of the following best describes one of the "elements of irony" referred to in the highlighted text?
A. Although the more scientific-minded historians of the second half of the nineteenth century considered women appropriate subjects for historical writing, earlier historians did not.
B. Although archival research uncovered documentary evidence of women's role in history, historians continued to rely on secondary sources for information about women.
C. Although historians were primarily concerned with writing about the public sphere, they generally relegated women to the private sphere.
D. The scientific approach to history revealed more information about women, but that information was ignored.
E. The professionalization of history, while marginalizing much of women's writing about history, enhanced the importance of women as historical subjects.



3. According to the passage, the development of archival research and the critical editing of collections of documents had which of the following effects?
A. Historians increasingly acknowledged women's contributions to history.
B. Historians began to debate whether secondary sources could provide reliable information.
C. Historians began to apply less rigorous scientific research criteria to the study of women's history.
D. More evidence concerning women became available to historical researchers.
E. Women began to study history as professional historians.



_________________

Piyush K
-----------------------
Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is to try just one more time. ― Thomas A. Edison
Don't forget to press--> Kudos :)
My Articles: 1. WOULD: when to use? | 2. All GMATPrep RCs (New)
Tip: Before exam a week earlier don't forget to exhaust all gmatprep problems specially for "sentence correction".


Originally posted by PiyushK on 12 Aug 2014, 07:59.
Last edited by Bunuel on 05 May 2018, 01:49, edited 4 times in total.
OA added
General Discussion
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 152
Concentration: General Management, Operations
Schools: HBS '19 (S)
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
Re: The professionalization of the study of history in the second half of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jan 2013, 05:02
Basically it says the new history claimed to give more importance to women in history ... it disregards a lot of information on women that was relevant ...

Can you explain why A for 1 ... whats wrong with E?
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 09 Jun 2013
Posts: 49
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V33
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.86
WE: Analyst (Advertising and PR)
Re: The professionalization of the study of history in the second half of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Aug 2013, 21:34
4
1
I hope this helps.

The topic sentence/ main idea of this passage is on the first line of the passage.
"The professionalization of the study of history in the second half of the nineteenth century, including history's transformation from a literary genre to a scientific discipline, had important consequences not only for historians' perceptions of women but also for women as historians." So, only choice (A) matches the purpose of this passage.

Here are some tips when you are doing RC section. Read the passage within two minutes scope and try to identify the topic sentence/ purpose of each passage and body paragraph. By asking yourself these questions, you will read the passage more actively and increase the chance of answering questions correctly. ^ ^
_________________

Don't be afraid to fail, but be afraid not to try

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 209
GMAT 1: 620 Q44 V31
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 3: 610 Q47 V28
GMAT 4: 700 Q50 V34
GMAT 5: 700 Q49 V36
GMAT 6: 690 Q48 V35
GMAT 7: 750 Q49 V42
GMAT 8: 730 Q50 V39
Re: The professionalization of the study of history in the second half of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 May 2014, 20:04
1
Explanation for elements of irony question:
http://www.manhattangmat.com/blog/index ... ed-dating/
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Jan 2013
Posts: 49
Re: The professionalization of the study of history in the second half of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jun 2014, 18:28
Can any one help me with this :
How can you relate the second sentence to the first one ?
1- The professionalization of the study of history in the second half of the nineteenth century, including history's transformation from a literary genre to a scientific discipline, had important consequences not only for historians' perceptions of women but also for women as historians.
2- The disappearance of women as objects of historical studies during this period has elements of irony to it.

when i was reading , i realized that the first sentence was talking about the affect of The professionalization on historians' perceptions of women and women as historians. then suddenly the passage started talking about the disappearance of women as an object . ….. this really confused me. i couldn't concentrate on the passage after that.

i have this problem also with some other passages. any advice about how can i fix this problem in future readings ?
thanks
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2014
Posts: 226
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The professionalization of the study of history in the second half of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jun 2014, 05:54
akhu wrote:
The passage is primarily concerned with

(A) describing some effects of the professionalization of the study of history on the writing of women's history
(B) explaining some reasons for the professionalization of the writing of history
(C) discussing the kinds of historical writing traditionally practiced by women
(D) contrasting the approach to the writing of history taken by women with the approach taken by men
(E) criticizing certain changes that occurred in the writing of historyduring the second half of the nineteenth century



Can someone please help on this one.

Thanks,


Furthermore I think the passage is not about writing of history but the study of history. I admit that there is a thin line of difference but it is this thin line which makes the difference in GMAT
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 Sep 2014
Posts: 49
Schools: CBS '18 (D)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The professionalization of the study of history in the second half of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 May 2015, 05:36
On question 1, I don't see anything that would amount to criticism. The author doesn't say whether something is wrong or right, and I think an opinion is required for a passage to be considered critical of the subject matter.
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2083
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: The professionalization of the study of history in the second half of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Aug 2016, 03:22
3
1
7 mins 30 seconds , including 2 mins 50 seconds to read

-The author does not provide an opinion
-The author talks about how the professionalization of women’s history has changed the way that history has been written
- Certain discoveries were passed off as irrelevant or ignored because they relegated women to the domestic sphere

1.
Answer A

2.
“On the other hand, the development of archival research and the critical editing of collections of documents began to reveal significant new historical evidence concerning women, yet this evidence was perceived as substantially irrelevant"

The above excerpt clearly states that the information revealed thanks to the scientific approach was ignored – which contradicts the whole purpose of the scientific approach. Hence the irony. Option (D) is the correct answer.

3.

“On the other hand, the development of archival research and the critical editing of collections of documents began to reveal significant new historical evidence concerning women"
Option (D) is a clear re instatement of the above and hence correct.
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Oct 2015
Posts: 53
Re: The professionalization of the study of history in the second half of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Nov 2016, 08:53
Why is option B wrong in 2nd question? Can someone please explain?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Status: Active
Affiliations: NA
Joined: 24 Oct 2012
Posts: 277
GMAT 1: 590 Q50 V21
GMAT 2: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V37
GPA: 3.5
Re: The professionalization of the study of history in the second half of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Feb 2017, 13:40
rmadmit wrote:
Why is option B wrong in 2nd question? Can someone please explain?


Hi,

Lines from the pasasge :
On the one hand, in writing about women, earlier historians had relied not on firsthand sources but rather on secondary sources.

In passage these lines tell about earlier historians whereas this line from passage suggests the shift to more rigorous research methods required that secondary sources be disregarded the view of current historian. Irony is about current historians not old , therefore B is wrong.
_________________

#If you like my post , please encourage me by giving Kudos :)

GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
S
Joined: 20 Nov 2016
Posts: 264
CAT Tests
Re: The professionalization of the study of history in the second half of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Nov 2017, 09:06
Feel free to use the request verbal experts' reply button to post specific questions. As described in the Rules to post on the Verbal Forum, avoid short/useless posts.

Thanks!
_________________

www.gmatninja.com

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 28 Sep 2017
Posts: 15
Location: India
GMAT 1: 590 Q46 V26
GPA: 3.9
Re: The professionalization of the study of history in the second half of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Nov 2017, 12:27
Could you please explain how option D is right for the second question?
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
P
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 2032
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: The professionalization of the study of history in the second half of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Nov 2017, 21:54
1
ADiCR7 wrote:
Could you please explain how option D is right for the second question?

Quote:
2. Which of the following best describes one of the "elements of irony" referred to in the highlighted text?

Remember to use process of elimination on ALL GMAT verbal questions:

Quote:
A. Although the more scientific-minded historians of the second half of the nineteenth century considered women appropriate subjects for historical writing, earlier historians did not.

The passage describes the "disappearance of women as objects of historical studies during this period". Choice (A) suggests the opposite, so it can be eliminated.

Quote:
B. Although archival research uncovered documentary evidence of women's role in history, historians continued to rely on secondary sources for information about women.

The passage specifically states that "the shift to more rigorous research methods required that secondary sources be disregarded." Choice (B) directly contradicts this information and be eliminated.

Quote:
C. Although historians were primarily concerned with writing about the public sphere, they generally relegated women to the private sphere.

This seems in line with the information in the passage, but does it describe "elements of irony"? If women belong to the private sphere and historians are primarily focused on the public sphere, we would EXPECT a disappearance of women as objects of historical studies. There is nothing inconsistent or contradictory about that result, but leave choice (C) for now if you aren't sure.

Quote:
D. The scientific approach to history revealed more information about women, but that information was ignored.

The new approach revealed more information about women.. great! Oh wait, that new approach also means that we are going to IGNORE much of the additional information. The same approach that helped us GATHER the new information also tells us that we should IGNORE that same information.

We would expect an approach that reveals more information about women to INCREASE historical studies of women. But that same approach caused historians to ignore the very information they discovered. This surprising and seemingly contradictory result (much like a discrepancy) has "elements of irony", unlike the facts stated in choice (C). (D) seems like the best answer so far.

Quote:
E. The professionalization of history, while marginalizing much of women's writing about history, enhanced the importance of women as historical subjects.

As stated for choice (A), the passage describes the "disappearance of women as objects of historical studies during this period". This implies that the importance of women as historical subjects was not ENHANCED during this period, so (E) can be eliminated.

Choice (D) is the best answer.
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | Instagram | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars
Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply?
Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99 | Time management on verbal

Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 23 Aug 2016
Posts: 74
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 2.84
WE: Other (Energy and Utilities)
Reviews Badge
Re: The professionalization of the study of history in the second half of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Oct 2018, 11:57
GMATNinja wrote:
ADiCR7 wrote:
Could you please explain how option D is right for the second question?

Quote:
2. Which of the following best describes one of the "elements of irony" referred to in the highlighted text?

Remember to use process of elimination on ALL GMAT verbal questions:

Quote:
A. Although the more scientific-minded historians of the second half of the nineteenth century considered women appropriate subjects for historical writing, earlier historians did not.

The passage describes the "disappearance of women as objects of historical studies during this period". Choice (A) suggests the opposite, so it can be eliminated.

Quote:
B. Although archival research uncovered documentary evidence of women's role in history, historians continued to rely on secondary sources for information about women.

The passage specifically states that "the shift to more rigorous research methods required that secondary sources be disregarded." Choice (B) directly contradicts this information and be eliminated.

Quote:
C. Although historians were primarily concerned with writing about the public sphere, they generally relegated women to the private sphere.

This seems in line with the information in the passage, but does it describe "elements of irony"? If women belong to the private sphere and historians are primarily focused on the public sphere, we would EXPECT a disappearance of women as objects of historical studies. There is nothing inconsistent or contradictory about that result, but leave choice (C) for now if you aren't sure.

Quote:
D. The scientific approach to history revealed more information about women, but that information was ignored.

The new approach revealed more information about women.. great! Oh wait, that new approach also means that we are going to IGNORE much of the additional information. The same approach that helped us GATHER the new information also tells us that we should IGNORE that same information.

We would expect an approach that reveals more information about women to INCREASE historical studies of women. But that same approach caused historians to ignore the very information they discovered. This surprising and seemingly contradictory result (much like a discrepancy) has "elements of irony", unlike the facts stated in choice (C). (D) seems like the best answer so far.

Quote:
E. The professionalization of history, while marginalizing much of women's writing about history, enhanced the importance of women as historical subjects.

As stated for choice (A), the passage describes the "disappearance of women as objects of historical studies during this period". This implies that the importance of women as historical subjects was not ENHANCED during this period, so (E) can be eliminated.

Choice (D) is the best answer.


Sir,

Need help with question 1!

i selected E but OA is A.

how?
i m confused?
_________________

Thanks and Regards,

Honneeey.

In former years,Used to run for "Likes", nowadays, craving for "Kudos". :D

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 11 Sep 2017
Posts: 28
CAT Tests
Re: The professionalization of the study of history in the second half of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Oct 2018, 17:15
GMATNinja GMATNinjatwo mikemcgarry
For the primary purpose question, can you pl explain how th answer is A and not E.
Is it very clear from the passage that the author has not presented his view. Hence criticising is not correct.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 07 Apr 2018
Posts: 29
Re: The professionalization of the study of history in the second half of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Oct 2018, 18:11
the passage in short conveys how professionalization of the study of history has reduced the importance of women history and women historians. The scientific method used in the new study disrepute the general style of women historians.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 11 Sep 2017
Posts: 28
CAT Tests
Re: The professionalization of the study of history in the second half of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2018, 07:12
For question#3, I have a doubt as to how option b is incorrect. In the passage just above the place where archival methods are mentioned. It has been mentioned that the secondary sources were disregarded. Also, is D right because the researchers did recieve the evidence but the phenomenon of ignoring the evidence happened at later stage. Hence no one can deny the fact that more evidence was indeed available
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The professionalization of the study of history in the second half of &nbs [#permalink] 10 Oct 2018, 07:12
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The professionalization of the study of history in the second half of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.