GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 16 Jun 2019, 23:57

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# There is little point in looking to artists for insights

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Posts: 618
There is little point in looking to artists for insights  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 14 Mar 2016, 02:28
4
10
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

68% (01:41) correct 32% (01:43) wrong based on 563 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

24. There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues. Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist. Indeed, when taken as a whole, the statements made by artists, including those considered to be great, indicate that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together.

Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage?

(A) There are no artists who have insights into political issues.

(B) A thorough education in art makers a person reasonably well educated.

(C) Every reasonably well-educated person who s not an artist has more insight into political issues than any artist.

(D) Politicians rarely have any artistic talent.

(E) Some artists are no less politically insightful than some reasonably well-educated persons who are not artists.

Originally posted by kpadma on 11 Feb 2004, 12:57.
Last edited by JarvisR on 14 Mar 2016, 02:28, edited 1 time in total.
SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1656
Location: NewJersey USA
Re: There is little point in looking to artists for insights  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2004, 13:22
My choice is E. The most diplomatic statement.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4008
Re: There is little point in looking to artists for insights  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2004, 13:23
You're 1 second too late Anandk
_________________
Best Regards,

Paul
SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1656
Location: NewJersey USA
Re: There is little point in looking to artists for insights  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2004, 13:24
Let us hope we are correct on this one unless kpadma has set some trap.
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Aug 2003
Posts: 443
Location: In the middle of nowhere
Re: There is little point in looking to artists for insights  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2004, 13:29
Bolis down to C and E...

I choose E..

Vivek.
_________________
"Start By Doing What Is Necessary ,Then What Is Possible & Suddenly You Will Realise That You Are Doing The Impossible"
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4008
Re: There is little point in looking to artists for insights  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2004, 13:43
1
I hesitated a bit on C but it cannot be the answer because from stimuli:
Most of them [artists] hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist.

Therefore, we cannot conclude that:
Every reasonably well-educated person who s not an artist has more insight into political issues than any artist.
_________________
Best Regards,

Paul
SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1656
Location: NewJersey USA
Re: There is little point in looking to artists for insights  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2004, 13:46
I thought the problem with C is "any artist" at the end.
Was it a LSAT question ?
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4008
Re: There is little point in looking to artists for insights  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2004, 13:55
Right, any artist is what is wrong and should have been bolded. But every person who's not an artist is also wrong because it because it means that all of them are better than artists
_________________
Best Regards,

Paul
Manager
Joined: 17 Dec 2013
Posts: 56
GMAT Date: 01-08-2015
Re: There is little point in looking to artists for insights  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2014, 23:33
2
C or E

for me, E would make sense:

E) Some artists are no less politically insightful than some reasonably well-educated persons who are not artists.

This sentence: Indeed, when taken as a whole, the statements made by artists, including those considered to be great, indicate that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together. -> rarely means there is a realistic possibility. that means there ARE some artists no less ...
Intern
Joined: 09 Mar 2016
Posts: 20
Re: There is little point in looking to artists for insights  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Oct 2016, 14:52
I'm surprised LSAT questions have such flaws in their answers, especially those based on formal reasoning like this one. Not sure if the phrasing of the question - 'Which one of the following can be inferred' makes it ok but basic set theory shows that Option E does not follow logically.

Most can include 'all' too. While some clearly means greater than 0.

Still E is the best of the choices. Don't like that fact that LSAT makes some such lame jumps in logic, I thought only GMAT questions allow for loose logical reasoning.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2871
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: There is little point in looking to artists for insights  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Oct 2016, 13:13
2
1
cogen234 wrote:
I'm surprised LSAT questions have such flaws in their answers, especially those based on formal reasoning like this one. Not sure if the phrasing of the question - 'Which one of the following can be inferred' makes it ok but basic set theory shows that Option E does not follow logically.

Most can include 'all' too. While some clearly means greater than 0.

Still E is the best of the choices. Don't like that fact that LSAT makes some such lame jumps in logic, I thought only GMAT questions allow for loose logical reasoning.

The statement "most of X" does not include "all of X" (otherwise one would say "all of X") at least in GMAT - the mathematical analogy that you are trying to draw here (most of something means greater than 50% of that thing, including 100% of that thing) may lead you to clicking on the wrong answer or at least spending a few seconds unnecessarily on the test day. It is beneficial to think that most of something is more than 50%, but less than 100%, because 100% of something would imply all of that thing.
Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2013
Posts: 237
There is little point in looking to artists for insights  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 17 May 2017, 02:27
2
There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues. Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist. Indeed, when taken as a whole, the statements made by artists, including those considered to be great, indicate that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together.

Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage?
(A) There are no artists who have insights into political issues.
(B) A thorough education in art makes a person reasonably well educated.
(C) Every reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist has more insight into political issues than any artist.
(D) Politicians rarely have any artistic talent.
(E) Some artists are no less politically insightful than some reasonably well-educated persons who are not artists.
_________________
We Shall Overcome... One day...

Originally posted by nahid78 on 10 Feb 2017, 02:34.
Last edited by broall on 17 May 2017, 02:27, edited 2 times in total.
Merged topic. Please search before posting
Intern
Joined: 05 Jan 2017
Posts: 22
Location: India
GMAT 1: 540 Q35 V29
Re: There is little point in looking to artists for  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2017, 03:17
E is the closest -

A - There are no artists who have insights into
political issues. - wrong - statement says most - not all
B - A thorough education in art makes a person
reasonably well educated. - out of scope - we don't know what education in art does to a person - Wrong

C - Every reasonably well-educated person who is
not an artist has more insight into political issues than any artist. - Same - statement says most , not every or all - wrong
D - Politicians rarely have any artistic talent. - Statement does not say anything about politicians - wrong
E - Some artists are no less politically insightful
than some reasonably well-educated persons
who are not artists. - makes sense - most artists do not have insight - that means some do - CORRECT.
Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2016
Posts: 210
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 620 Q50 V24
GRE 1: Q167 V147
Re: There is little point in looking to artists for  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2017, 08:36
IMHO,the following is my reasoning.

nahid78 wrote:
There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues. Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist.Indeed, when taken as a whole, the statements made by artists, including those considered to be great,indicate that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together.

Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage?
(A) There are no artists who have insights into political issues.
-- This choice is too strong.The passage mentioned that artists are less insightful in political issue,not that they have none at all.

(B) A thorough education in art makes a person reasonably well educated.
-- One of the premise states that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together!!

(C) Every reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist has more insight into political issues than any artist.
-- The passage just mentions most of well-educated people have more insight!!

(D) Politicians rarely have any artistic talent.
-- We know nothing about the politicians.

(E) Some artists are no less politically insightful than some reasonably well-educated persons who are not artists.
-- CORRECT.
Intern
Joined: 06 Mar 2010
Posts: 5
Re: There is little point in looking to artists for  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Feb 2017, 16:23
sleepynut wrote:
IMHO,the following is my reasoning.

nahid78 wrote:
There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues. Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist.Indeed, when taken as a whole, the statements made by artists, including those considered to be great,indicate that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together.

Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage?
(A) There are no artists who have insights into political issues.
-- This choice is too strong.The passage mentioned that artists are less insightful in political issue,not that they have none at all.

(B) A thorough education in art makes a person reasonably well educated.
-- One of the premise states that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together!!

(C) Every reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist has more insight into political issues than any artist.
-- The passage just mentions most of well-educated people have more insight!!

(D) Politicians rarely have any artistic talent.
-- We know nothing about the politicians.

(E) Some artists are no less politically insightful than some reasonably well-educated persons who are not artists.
-- CORRECT.

It is very hard to understand E is the correct answer. Ans choice E says that "some artists are no less politically insightful" which means some are politically insightful than reasonably educated persons. The stimulus says " Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist"
Board of Directors
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3627
Re: There is little point in looking to artists for  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Apr 2017, 06:31
vijaykvk wrote:
It is very hard to understand E is the correct answer. Ans choice E says that "some artists are no less politically insightful" which means some are politically insightful than reasonably educated persons. The stimulus says " Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist"

So, you are missing one point here.

If I am saying MOST of them are less insightful, This would mean atleast 1 is there who is no less insightful.

Say I have total 100 artists. I am saying 99 are less insightful (Take this as MOST are), it means atleast 1 is there who is no less or more insightful. Hence, E makes sense here.
_________________
My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place

GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.
New! Best Reply Functionality on GMAT Club!
Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free
Check our new About Us Page here.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2301
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: There is little point in looking to artists for insights  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Dec 2017, 06:12
24. There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues. Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist. Indeed, when taken as a whole, the statements made by artists, including those considered to be great, indicate that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together.

Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage?

(A) There are no artists who have insights into political issues.

(B) A thorough education in art makers a person reasonably well educated.

(C) Every reasonably well-educated person who s not an artist has more insight into political issues than any artist.

(D) Politicians rarely have any artistic talent.

(E) Some artists are no less politically insightful than some reasonably well-educated persons who are not artists.

If you notice, this inference question is a little unique because it presents us with an argument. So, I approached this as more of an assumption question; I was on the lookout for a necessary assumption as I went to the answers.

The conclusion is found in the first sentence, while the remainder of the argument is structured to support this first sentence. Notice how qualified the author's statements are and, in particular, I think the key words to pay attention to are "little point" in the conclusion. The words "rarely found together" are very important from the final sentence, which acts as a premise in the argument.

The assumption that jumped out at me almost immediately was that the author must think that there is still "some" point to look to artists for political insights, or else he/she would have said "there's no point" in the conclusion (instead of saying that there's "little point"). Furthermore, the author would have used the word "never" instead of "rarely" in the final sentence, which is a premise of course. But why is this the case, you might ask? The reason for this must be that, as (E) points out, there must some artists that are just as politically insightful as the other group; if there weren't, the argument would fall apart instantaneously!

So, if one approached this question like I did, answers (A), (B), and (D) could be seen to be hopeless from the get-go.

Answer (C) is wrong because it weakens the argument directly and before you even negate it. If this answer were true, then why would there be "little point" or why would they "rarely" be found together?

So, to summarize, (C) is wrong because it weakens before it is negated and tends to strengthen the argument after it is negated. Answer choice (E) does the exact opposite and is thus the correct answer.
_________________
When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful
Manager
Joined: 14 May 2017
Posts: 53
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
Re: There is little point in looking to artists for insights  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Dec 2017, 23:56
24. There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues. Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist. Indeed, when taken as a whole, the statements made by artists, including those considered to be great, indicate that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together.

Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage?

(A) There are no artists who have insights into political issues.
(B) A thorough education in art makers a person reasonably well educated.
(C) Every reasonably well-educated person who s not an artist has more insight into political issues than any artist.
(D) Politicians rarely have any artistic talent.
(E) Some artists are no less politically insightful than some reasonably well-educated persons who are not artists.

We need to make an inference based on facts stated in the passage only. (Additional information/premises)/Extreme language/assumptions/paradoxical answers should not be considered. Avoid these distractions !

By Process of elimination,
we can eliminate A and D straight of the bat. D. Politicians are no where discussed in the passage. A. is extreme because of the phrase 'No artists'. C. compares well educated people who are not artists to artists but we don't have sufficient evidence to make such a comparison. B. We don't know what a thorough education in art can make a person based on the passage.

This leaves us with E the best choice which is the main point that the author is trying to infer.

If you found the explanation useful, please give it a thumbs up.

Thanks.
Manager
Status: To infinity and beyond
Joined: 26 Sep 2017
Posts: 246
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V30
GPA: 3.31
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
There is little point in looking to poetry for insights into political  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Dec 2017, 12:19
There is little point in looking to poetry for insights into political issues. Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not a poet. Indeed, when taken as a whole, the statements made by a poet, including those considered great, indicate that poetic talent and political insight are rarely found together.

Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage?

A.There are no poets who have insights into political issues.
B.Some poets are no less politically insightful than some reasonably well-educated persons who are not poets.
C.Every reasonably well-educated person who is not a poet has more insight into political issues than any poet.
D.Politicians rarely have any poetic talent.
E.A thorough education in poetry makers a person reasonably well educated.

Source:Crackverbal
_________________
Please give kudos if you like my post.Thanks
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 7743
Re: There is little point in looking to poetry for insights into political  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Dec 2017, 19:09
1
There is little point in looking to poetry for insights into political issues. Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not a poet. Indeed, when taken as a whole, the statements made by a poet, including those considered great, indicate that poetic talent and political insight are rarely found together.

Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage?

A.There are no poets who have insights into political issues.
Rarely found means there are some, so NO POETS is extreme..

B.Some poets are no less politically insightful than some reasonably well-educated persons who are not poets.
CORRECT.. rarely means some are equally insightful

C.Every reasonably well-educated person who is not a poet has more insight into political issues than any poet.
Again DEFIES word rarily by writing 'than any poet'

D.Politicians rarely have any poetic talent.
Out of context

E.A thorough education in poetry makes a person reasonably well educated.
again out of context

B
_________________
Re: There is little point in looking to poetry for insights into political   [#permalink] 18 Dec 2017, 19:09

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 21 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by