GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 14 Dec 2019, 22:53

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

To prevent harbor porpoises from getting tangled in its nets and suffo

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Jun 2011
Posts: 3
To prevent harbor porpoises from getting tangled in its nets and suffo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 20 Mar 2019, 21:34
5
12
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

77% (01:36) correct 23% (01:51) wrong based on 1028 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

To prevent harbor porpoises from getting tangled in its nets and suffocating, a fishing company installed acoustic alarms on all its boats that fish in waters off Massachusetts. The sound emitted temporarily disorients the porpoises and frightens them away. Since the installation of the alarms, the average number of porpoises caught in the company's nets has dropped from eight to one per month. The alarms, therefore, are saving the lives of harbor porpoises in those waters.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?


(A) The use of acoustic alarms increases the number of commercial fish caught by the fishing company's boats.

(B) When disoriented, harbor porpoises are not significantly more likely to be killed by other boats.

(C) Environmentalists advocate the use of acoustic alarms as a means of protecting the harbor porpoise population.

(D) The alarms were installed at the time of year when harbor porpoises are most plentiful in the Massachusetts waters.

(E) The cost of installing acoustic alarms on fishing boats is less than the cost of repairing nets damaged by harbor porpoises.

Originally posted by commandos1985 on 01 Apr 2012, 08:34.
Last edited by Bunuel on 20 Mar 2019, 21:34, edited 3 times in total.
Edited the question.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Jun 2011
Posts: 3
Re: To prevent harbor porpoises from getting tangled in its nets and suffo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Apr 2012, 08:35
HELP!
Can you explain me answers B and D?
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 30 Apr 2011
Posts: 12
Reviews Badge
Re: To prevent harbor porpoises from getting tangled in its nets and suffo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Apr 2012, 14:12
1
commandos1985 wrote:
HELP!
Can you explain me answers B and D?


B is correct because it addresses the issue of alarm saving lives.

D might serve as an explanation for why the company has caught less of porpoises, but does not address the saving their lives part.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2011
Posts: 92
Re: To prevent harbor porpoises from getting tangled in its nets and suffo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Apr 2012, 03:47
Plz give more explanations.........still not clear why not D.......

Doesn't saved from being suffocated means aved from being killed.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Apr 2012
Posts: 53
Re: To prevent harbor porpoises from getting tangled in its nets and suffo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Apr 2012, 23:56
1
I doubt if this is a text from GMAT.
I feel comfortable to assume that such a question is a creation of GMAT Tutors/ Private Organizations that prepare these questions for students benefit.

If this is infact a GMAT question, i expect it to be more precise as in option B.
There is an ambiguity here, other boats?? -- what are other boats?? -- 1)other boats of the same company or 2)other boats of different company that did not install the alarms??

Depending on the above, i would go with D if 1, i.e the other boats are mentioned as bpats of the same company, bcoz in such a case, B looses its importance as the average is already mentioned down to 1 from 8, so D is better as it supports the facts with its info.

But if other boats mean boats of other companies, I would go with B........ again if it says that other boats have no alarms installed on it.

This is my opinion, and if there are any experts around here, please thrash me if you feel my reasoning is wrong.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 28 Feb 2014
Posts: 2
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: To prevent harbor porpoises from getting tangled in its nets and suffo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Apr 2014, 11:23
The right choice would be "B" and here's why:
When the option says "other boats" it definitely mean boats of other organizations which have not installed alarms, since the porpoises would scatter away and even if some of the "other" boats were of the same organization they would have alarms installed again scattering them away.. but now the ones which don't have such alarms would cause a problem.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2014
Posts: 97
Re: To prevent harbor porpoises from getting tangled in its nets and suffo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Dec 2014, 17:51
commandos1985 wrote:
To prevent harbor porpoises from getting tangled in its nets and suffocating, a fishing company installed acoustic alarms on all its boats that fish in waters off Massachusetts. The sound emitted temporarily disorients the porpoises and frightens them away. Since the installation of the alarms, the average number of porpoises caught in the company's nets has dropped from eight to one per month. The alarms, therefore, are saving the lives of harbor porpoises in those waters.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The use of acoustic alarms increases the number of commercial fish caught by the fishing company's boats.

B. When disoriented, harbor porpoises are not significantly more likely to be killed by other boats.

C. Environmentalists advocate the use of acoustic alarms as a means of protecting the harbor porpoise population.

D. The alarms were installed at the time of year when harbor porpoises are most plentiful in the Massachusetts waters.

E. The cost of installing acoustic alarms on fishing boats is less than the cost of repairing nets damaged by harbor porpoises.


The conclusion here is that the alarms are saving lives.
B - If the alarm is causing harbor porpoises to get killed by other boats, then ultimately the alarms are not saving lives.

D - If we negate this option, we cannot say for sure whether the alarms are saving lives or the population is less in general and therefore not many porpoises are getting killed.
does not have the impact that B has.
BSchool Moderator
User avatar
B
Joined: 13 Jul 2015
Posts: 72
Location: Singapore
Schools: LBS '21 (A)
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V39
WE: Operations (Investment Banking)
Re: To prevent harbor porpoises from getting tangled in its nets and suffo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Sep 2015, 20:31
1
vdbhamare wrote:
Plz give more explanations.........still not clear why not D.......

Doesn't saved from being suffocated means aved from being killed.


I'm 3 years late in replying you haha. oh wells.

Option D is: The alarms were installed at the time of year when harbor porpoises are most plentiful in the Massachusetts waters

So what if harbor porpoises are most plentiful? Maybe the number of boats increased too? Larger population/Much larger boat population also can achieve a drop from 8-->1

What B is saying that, yes, the company registered a drop from 8 --> 1 of those CAUGHT IN NETS, but what about those disoriented porpoises that just swim straight into a boat and gets killed by other means? maybe they swam into the boats rotor which sliced them up? so the company registers a drop in those caught by nets but doesn't consider other possible means of death
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2435
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: To prevent harbor porpoises from getting tangled in its nets and suffo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2016, 03:10
1
To prevent harbor porpoises from getting tangled in its nets and suffocating, a fishing company installed acoustic alarms on all its boats that fish in waters off Massachusetts. The sound emitted temporarily disorients the porpoises and frightens them away. Since the installation of the alarms, the average number of porpoises caught in the company's nets has dropped from eight to one per month. The alarms, therefore, are saving the lives of harbor porpoises in those waters.

Type - Assumption
-Fishing company has installed alarms on boats
-Sound emitted temporarily disorients the porpoises and frightens them
- Monthly Average number of porpoises caught in nets has dropped from 8 to 1 .
Conclusion - Alarms are saving the lives of porpoises

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The use of acoustic alarms increases the number of commercial fish caught by the fishing company's boats. Irrelevant

B. When disoriented, harbor porpoises are not significantly more likely to be killed by other boats. Correct answer - if this is true , the alarms are not saving the lives of porpoises

C. Environmentalists advocate the use of acoustic alarms as a means of protecting the harbor porpoise population. Irrelevant - the opinion of Environmentalists does not matter

D. The alarms were installed at the time of year when harbor porpoises are most plentiful in the Massachusetts waters. Incorrect - the quantity does not matter as long as the alarms are saving the lives the porpoises .Also , even if we negate this , the alarms were installed at the time of year when porpoise population was below the peak , the alarms might still help in saving lives .

E. The cost of installing acoustic alarms on fishing boats is less than the cost of repairing nets damaged by harbor porpoises. Irrelevant

Answer B
_________________
When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 26 Feb 2015
Posts: 64
GPA: 3.92
Re: To prevent harbor porpoises from getting tangled in its nets and suffo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Dec 2016, 22:49
Skywalker18 wrote:
To prevent harbor porpoises from getting tangled in its nets and suffocating, a fishing company installed acoustic alarms on all its boats that fish in waters off Massachusetts. The sound emitted temporarily disorients the porpoises and frightens them away. Since the installation of the alarms, the average number of porpoises caught in the company's nets has dropped from eight to one per month. The alarms, therefore, are saving the lives of harbor porpoises in those waters.

Type - Assumption
-Fishing company has installed alarms on boats
-Sound emitted temporarily disorients the porpoises and frightens them
- Monthly Average number of porpoises caught in nets has dropped from 8 to 1 .
Conclusion - Alarms are saving the lives of porpoises

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The use of acoustic alarms increases the number of commercial fish caught by the fishing company's boats. Irrelevant

B. When disoriented, harbor porpoises are not significantly more likely to be killed by other boats. Correct answer - if this is true , the alarms are not saving the lives of porpoises

C. Environmentalists advocate the use of acoustic alarms as a means of protecting the harbor porpoise population. Irrelevant - the opinion of Environmentalists does not matter

D. The alarms were installed at the time of year when harbor porpoises are most plentiful in the Massachusetts waters. Incorrect - the quantity does not matter as long as the alarms are saving the lives the porpoises .Also , even if we negate this , the alarms were installed at the time of year when porpoise population was below the peak , the alarms might still help in saving lives .

E. The cost of installing acoustic alarms on fishing boats is less than the cost of repairing nets damaged by harbor porpoises. Irrelevant

Answer B


D also contradicts the question stem's use of "average" when describing the number saved.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 03 Dec 2018
Posts: 169
Re: To prevent harbor porpoises from getting tangled in its nets and suffo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Mar 2019, 07:46
Negation of B directly destroys the cocnlusion. But how to eliminate option D?

The conclusion is based on the premise that propoises caught has dropped from 8 to 1. What if the alarms were insatalled when the propoises were not plentiful and the number drop is due to less propoises.

Please explain why D is wrong?
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 22 Sep 2018
Posts: 61
Re: To prevent harbor porpoises from getting tangled in its nets and suffo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Apr 2019, 00:37
Could someone help to explain B is an assumption we have to consider? Why is the 'disoriented' in option B mean? This confused me. I do understand if the purpoises are not more likely to be killed by other boats, then we can confirm that the alarms actually do save the lives of harbor purposes. Please help to clarify this doubt. Thanks.
CEO
CEO
User avatar
V
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 3063
Location: India
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Re: To prevent harbor porpoises from getting tangled in its nets and suffo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Apr 2019, 09:09
2
Leonaann wrote:
Could someone help to explain B is an assumption we have to consider? Why is the 'disoriented' in option B mean? This confused me. I do understand if the purpoises are not more likely to be killed by other boats, then we can confirm that the alarms actually do save the lives of harbor purposes. Please help to clarify this doubt. Thanks.
The support is ~"the company's plan (alarms) helped to reduce the number of porpoises killed by its (the company's) boats". The conclusion is that the company's plan is "saving the lives of harbor porpoises in those waters".

There is a clear "gap" here between the number of porpoises killed by the company's boats and the number of porpoises dying "in those waters": what if the company's plan causes something to happen that makes the porpoises significantly more likely to be killed by some other means? In that case, even if the company's own boats don't kill as many porpoises as they used to, the company's plan will end up leading to the deaths of many more porpoises. That's what option B addresses. It says that the probability that harbor porpoises will be killed in some other way is not high, and therefore the net impact of the company's plan is likely to be positive.

The "disoriented" bit just describes the effect on the porpoises of the alarms that the company installed on its boats ("the sound emitted temporarily disorients the porpoises").
_________________
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
D
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 3008
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: To prevent harbor porpoises from getting tangled in its nets and suffo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 May 2019, 06:19
mallya12 wrote:
Negation of B directly destroys the cocnlusion. But how to eliminate option D?

The conclusion is based on the premise that propoises caught has dropped from 8 to 1. What if the alarms were insatalled when the propoises were not plentiful and the number drop is due to less propoises.

Please explain why D is wrong?

The question asks "Which [answer choice] is an assumption on which the argument depends." So, we are looking for an answer choice that MUST be true in order for the author to reach his/her conclusion.

The conclusion is that "The alarms... are saving the lives of harbor porpoises in those waters."

Evidence for this conclusion is that "since the installation of the alarms, the average number of porpoises caught in the company's nets has dropped from eight to one per month."

With this in mind, take another look at (D):
Quote:
(D) The alarms were installed at the time of year when harbor porpoises are most plentiful in the Massachusetts waters.

Does this absolutely have to be true in order for the author to reach his/her conclusion?

Think through the argument if the author does not assume that the nets were installed during the time of year when porpoises are most plentiful. Perhaps the alarms were installed when the population was low, and then a bunch of porpoises arrived in the months after. This would strengthen the evidence in the passage, because the number of porpoises caught in nets has decreased despite the overall population increasing. Because the argument does not fall apart if (D) is not assumed, (D) is not an argument on which the argument depends.

Note: this hypothetical situation is sufficient to eliminate (D), but you could think of many additional cases in which this answer choice impacts the conclusion in different ways.

Let's say that the alarms were installed at the time of year when porpoises are most plentiful -- what does that do to the conclusion? It depends on several additional factors. Maybe a huge majority of the porpoises left the Massachusetts waters immediately after the alarms were installed, so the number getting caught in the company's nets would decrease with or without the influence of the alarms. This would weaken the author's conclusion. Maybe the large number of porpoises did stick around -- if this were the case, the evidence in the passage would not be affected.

Overall, we cannot say how the information in (D) impacts the author's conclusion, so it is definitely not an assumption on which the argument depends.

I hope that helps!
_________________
GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (we're hiring!) | GMAT Club Verbal Expert | Instagram | Blog | Bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal: RC | CR | SC

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars: all videos by topic

SC articles & resources: How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

RC, CR, and other articles & resources: All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99 | Time management on verbal

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations: All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply? Hit the request verbal experts' reply button; be specific about your question, and tag @GMATNinja. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: To prevent harbor porpoises from getting tangled in its nets and suffo   [#permalink] 20 May 2019, 06:19
Display posts from previous: Sort by

To prevent harbor porpoises from getting tangled in its nets and suffo

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne