Last visit was: 18 May 2024, 00:07 It is currently 18 May 2024, 00:07
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 986
Own Kudos [?]: 3469 [69]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Dhaka
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 97
Own Kudos [?]: 810 [21]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2005
Posts: 396
Own Kudos [?]: 71 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 276
Own Kudos [?]: 154 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: New York
Send PM
Re: Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wil [#permalink]
E is the answer. It is the only answer that cannot be true in all instances..therefore weakening the stimulus.

nakib77 wrote:
Q38:
Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wild. The countries in which the tigers’ habitats are located are currently debating joint legislation that would ban tiger hunting. Thus, if these countries can successfully enforce this legislation, the survival of tigers in the wild will be ensured.
The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument
A. assumes without sufficient warrant that a ban on tiger hunting could be successfully enforced
B. considers the effects of hunting on tigers without also considering the effects of hunting on other endangered animal species
C. fails to take into account how often tiger hunters are unsuccessful in their attempts to kill tigers
D. neglects to consider the results of governmental attempts in the past to limit tiger hunting
E. takes the removal of an impediment to the tigers’ survival as a guarantee of their survival
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Aug 2005
Posts: 32
Own Kudos [?]: 55 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wil [#permalink]
[quote="nakib77"]Q38:
Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wild. The countries in which the tigers’ habitats are located are currently debating joint legislation that would ban tiger hunting. Thus, if these countries can successfully enforce this legislation, the survival of tigers in the wild will be ensured.
The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument
A. assumes without sufficient warrant that a ban on tiger hunting could be successfully enforced
B. considers the effects of hunting on tigers without also considering the effects of hunting on other endangered animal species
C. fails to take into account how often tiger hunters are unsuccessful in their attempts to kill tigers
D. neglects to consider the results of governmental attempts in the past to limit tiger hunting
E. takes the removal of an impediment to the tigers’ survival as a guarantee of their survival[/quote

E as well. OA pls
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 2003
Own Kudos [?]: 1905 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Singapore
Send PM
Re: Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wil [#permalink]
E is the best choice. It assumes that as long as there's no tiger hunting, the population of the tigers will benefit. This ignores other human activities that cause the tigers to be extinct, for example, deforestation which destroys the natural habitat of the tigers.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 91
Own Kudos [?]: 398 [0]
Given Kudos: 18
Location: Montreal
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Harvard, Yale, HEC
Send PM
Re: Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wil [#permalink]
Need explanations. Thanks guys.
Attachments

CR1.jpg
CR1.jpg [ 110.72 KiB | Viewed 58090 times ]

User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 28 Sep 2009
Status:Graduated
Affiliations: HEC
Posts: 1505
Own Kudos [?]: 1124 [1]
Given Kudos: 432
Concentration: Economics, Finance
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V44
Re: Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wil [#permalink]
1
Kudos
E is best. The author believes that the tiger's survival is gauranteed once these countries band together. In other words, the only thing preventing the tiger's survival is the absence of this united front from the governments in question. Once the government carries out its promise, then tigers will escape extinction:

Government action = tigers live
No government action = all tigers die

As you can see, the author's argument is way too simplistic.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 91
Own Kudos [?]: 398 [0]
Given Kudos: 18
Location: Montreal
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Harvard, Yale, HEC
Send PM
Re: Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wil [#permalink]
Thanks guys, I really appreciate your help. I realize now that all I need to answer the question is look for the assumption. I was looking for thing that was "vulnarable to criticism" in stead.

Thanks Jade3, + 1 from me.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Jun 2009
Posts: 197
Own Kudos [?]: 1610 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Send PM
Re: Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wil [#permalink]
Are the critical reasoning questions in gmat prep on par with the actual gmat?
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 08 May 2009
Status:There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Posts: 550
Own Kudos [?]: 589 [0]
Given Kudos: 10
Send PM
Re: Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wil [#permalink]
conclusion does exactly what E states.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Status:Time to apply!
Posts: 95
Own Kudos [?]: 441 [1]
Given Kudos: 166
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V29
GMAT 3: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.2
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wil [#permalink]
1
Kudos
jade3 wrote:
A. assumes without sufficient warrant that a ban on tiger hunting could be successfully enforced
-“if these countries can successfully enforce this legislation”-clearly says that Author has some doubts over the implementation. So Author is not assume this
-incorrect

B. considers the effects of hunting on tigers without also considering the effects of hunting on other endangered animal species
-Out of scope

C. fails to take into account how often tiger hunters are unsuccessful in their attempts to kill tigers
-Out of scope

D. neglects to consider the results of governmental attempts in the past to limit tiger hunting
-Out of scope

E. takes the removal of an impediment to the tigers survival as a guarantee of their survival
- “Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wild”- clearly the author assumes that only hunting will result in tiger extension. It is possible that even if the ban is in place, the tigers could become extinct by some disease or by a natural calamity.
Hence this is the correct Answer.



nice explanation ... specially for A ..I was confused with A ...
your explanation cleared my doubt on A ... thanks ! :)
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Posts: 114
Own Kudos [?]: 171 [0]
Given Kudos: 110
Send PM
Re: Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wil [#permalink]
Straight E. Not that tough to answer this one, considering that 3 out of 5 choices are out of scope. The only contenders are A and E. E is clearly the winner.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 69
Own Kudos [?]: 35 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, International Business
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V37
Send PM
Re: Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wil [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Author claims the if all countries ban hunting then tiger’s will survive.
And we need to provide a counter argument which states that this cannot prevent tiger survival
A ) maybe but no counter argument is there
B ) No
C ) No
D ) no
E ) Yes a counter argument is provided
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 131
Own Kudos [?]: 182 [3]
Given Kudos: 13
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.69
WE:Analyst (Mutual Funds and Brokerage)
Send PM
Re: Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wil [#permalink]
3
Kudos
piyushksharma wrote:
Unless tiger hunting decreases,tigers will soon be extinct in the wild. The countries in which the tiger's habitats are located are currently debating joint legislation that would ban tiger hunting. thus if these countries can successfully enforce the legislation, the survival of tigers in the wild can be ensured.
The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument
1) assumes without sufficient warrant that a ban on tiger hunting could be successfully enforced.
2)considers the effect of hunting on tigers without also considering the effects of hunting on other edangered animal species.
3)fails to take into account how often tiger hunters are successful in their attempts to kill tigers
4)neglects to consider the results of governmental attempts in the past to limit tiger hunting
5)takes the removal of an impediment to the tiger's survival as a guarantee of their survival.




Please explain the answer to this question in detail. Thanks in advance.


(A) Incorrect: Paragraph never assumes that the ban will be successfully enforced. It says "IF these countries can successfully enforce the legislation . . ."

(B) Incorrect: The paragraph is not intended to address the problem of other endangered animals. Its argument is that a successful ban on tiger hunting will allow for the survival of tigers. Other endangered animals has nothing to do with this.

(C) Incorrect: Not that strong of an argument against the author's reasoning. Even if tiger hunters aren't that successful, a successful ban on tiger hunting should help the survival of tigers.

(D) Incorrect: Past bans are outside the scope of the argument. We can't assume past bans have any impact on how successful a future ban will be

(E) Correct: The red-flag in the author's original reasoning is that if tiger hunting is banned, then tiger survival is ensured. This assumes that there is nothing else out there that is hurting tiger survival. There's no guarantee that some other factor isn't leading to the endangering of tigers
Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 Feb 2012
Posts: 121
Own Kudos [?]: 80 [0]
Given Kudos: 109
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.67
Send PM
Re: Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wil [#permalink]
A: The argument does not assume this : " If these countries can .."
B: Not related.
C :Banning helps the survival of the tiger and this answer is not optimal compared to E.
D: Not related.
E: Correct.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Posts: 155
Own Kudos [?]: 474 [0]
Given Kudos: 48
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Send PM
Re: Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wil [#permalink]
Unless tiger hunting decreases,tigers will soon be extinct in the wild. The countries in which the tiger's habitats are located are currently debating joint legislation that would ban tiger hunting.

thus if these countries can successfully enforce the legislation, the survival of tigers in the wild can be ensured.

The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument

1) assumes without sufficient warrant that a ban on tiger hunting could be successfully enforced.--> irrelevant

2)considers the effect of hunting on tigers without also considering the effects of hunting on other edangered animal species.
--> other species OUT OF SCOPE

3)fails to take into account how often tiger hunters are successful in their attempts to kill tigers
-->IRRELEVANT

4)neglects to consider the results of governmental attempts in the past to limit tiger hunting
--> IRRELEVANT

5)takes the removal of an impediment to the tiger's survival as a guarantee of their survival.
--> CORRECT
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 136
Own Kudos [?]: 495 [0]
Given Kudos: 2412
GMAT 1: 620 Q44 V31
GMAT 2: 610 Q47 V28
GMAT 3: 700 Q49 V36
GMAT 4: 690 Q48 V35
GMAT 5: 750 Q49 V42
GMAT 6: 730 Q50 V39
GPA: 3
Send PM
Re: Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wil [#permalink]
Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wild. The countries in which the tigers’ habitats are located are currently debating joint legislation that would ban tiger hunting. Thus, if these countries can successfully enforce this legislation, the survival of tigers in the wild will be ensured.

Notes
Tigers die from hunting.
Countries in which tigers live are thinking of passing a law that will ban hunting.
Conclusion: tigers will not be extinct

ASU:
Tiger hunters can't find another way around the law.

Tigers won't die from other means such as disease or loss of habitat.

The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument
A. assumes without sufficient warrant that a ban on tiger hunting could be successfully enforced

Wrong: no assumption that ban could be enforced. Even if the ban were enforced, tigers could die from other means.

B. considers the effects of hunting on tigers without also considering the effects of hunting on other endangered animal species

Wrong:
Out of scope, because hunting of other animals is irrelevant

C. fails to take into account how often tiger hunters are unsuccessful in their attempts to kill tigers

Wrong: success of hunters is irrelevant

D. neglects to consider the results of governmental attempts in the past to limit tiger hunting

Wrong:
Past efforts are irrelevant.

E. takes the removal of an impediment to the tiger's survival as a guarantee of their survival
Correct:
Tigers could die from other means. Hunting is just one of those means.

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Feb 2014
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 10
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wil [#permalink]
E would be the right choice.. as the premise stands on the assumption that Only hunting is the sole cause of extinction, which is rather one of the reasons.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Sep 2016
Status:DONE!
Posts: 273
Own Kudos [?]: 100 [0]
Given Kudos: 283
Send PM
Re: Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wil [#permalink]
E is correct

A. assumes without sufficient warrant that a ban on tiger hunting could be successfully enforced --> No; we're not talking about enforcement here
B. considers the effects of hunting on tigers without also considering the effects of hunting on other endangered animal species --> outside of the scope; we're talking about tigers here
C. fails to take into account how often tiger hunters are unsuccessful in their attempts to kill tigers --> irrelevant
D. neglects to consider the results of governmental attempts in the past to limit tiger hunting --> irrelevant
E. takes the removal of an impediment to the tigers' survival as a guarantee of their survival --> CORRECT
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wil [#permalink]
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6929 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts