GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 25 May 2019, 00:50

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Senior PS Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 26 Feb 2016
Posts: 3386
Location: India
GPA: 3.12
Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Jul 2018, 02:20
4
1
22
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

29% (02:12) correct 71% (02:06) wrong based on 523 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident that a lot of activity in the team
did not align with the project's objectives, and would have been challenged if the team were aware of the
project's purpose.


A. Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident that a lot of activity in the team
did not align with the project's objectives, and would have been challenged if the team were aware of the
project's purpose.

B. It was evident that a lot of activity in the team did not align with the project's objectives, and would have
been challenged if the team was aware of the project's purpose when, unsurprisingly, commitment in the
team was low.

C. Surprisingly, it was evident that a lot of activity in the team did not align with the project's objectives, and
would have been challenged if the team were aware of the project's purpose when, unsurprisingly, commitment
in the team was low.

D. Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident that a lot of activity in the team did
not align with the project's objectives, and would have been challenged if the team had been aware of the
project's purpose.

E. Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident that a lot of activity in the team did
not align with the project's objectives, and would have been challenged if the team was aware of the project's
purpose.

Source: Experts Global

_________________
You've got what it takes, but it will take everything you've got
VP
VP
User avatar
D
Joined: 09 Mar 2016
Posts: 1283
Re: Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Jul 2018, 02:32
1
A. Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident that a lot of activity in the team
did not align with the project's objectives, and would have been challenged if the team were aware of the
project's purpose.

B. It was evident that a lot of activity in the team did not align with the project's objectives, and would have
been challenged if the team was aware of the project's purpose when, unsurprisingly, commitment in the
team was low.

C. Surprisingly, it was evident that a lot of activity in the team did not align with the project's objectives, and
would have been challenged if the team were aware of the project's purpose when, unsurprisingly, commitment
in the team was low.

D. Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident that a lot of activity in the team did
not align with the project's objectives, and would have been challenged if the team had been aware of the
project's purpose.
( IMO this option is correct :) correct usage of past subjuntive

E. Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident that a lot of activity in the team did
not align with the project's objectives, and would have been challenged if the team was aware of the project's
purpose.
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 7686
Re: Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Jul 2018, 05:34
2
pushpitkc wrote:
Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident that a lot of activity in the team
did not align with the project's objectives, and would have been challenged if the team were aware of the
project's purpose.


A. Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident that a lot of activity in the team
did not align with the project's objectives, and would have been challenged if the team were aware of the
project's purpose.

B. It was evident that a lot of activity in the team did not align with the project's objectives, and would have
been challenged if the team was aware of the project's purpose when, unsurprisingly, commitment in the
team was low.

C. Surprisingly, it was evident that a lot of activity in the team did not align with the project's objectives, and
would have been challenged if the team were aware of the project's purpose when, unsurprisingly, commitment
in the team was low.

D. Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident that a lot of activity in the team did
not align with the project's objectives, and would have been challenged if the team had been aware of the
project's purpose.

E. Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident that a lot of activity in the team did
not align with the project's objectives, and would have been challenged if the team was aware of the project's
purpose.

Source: Experts Global


Entire question hinges on if the team were/was/had been aware....
What is this If team .... Is hypothetical and so WERE is correct..

A
_________________
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
P
Joined: 15 Oct 2017
Posts: 309
GMAT 1: 560 Q42 V25
GMAT 2: 570 Q43 V27
GMAT 3: 710 Q49 V39
Reviews Badge
Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Jul 2018, 06:04
1
IMO A.

Only A uses subjunctive correctly.

D has sequencing error (would + had been) and E uses subjunctive incorrectly (would + was).
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 29 Dec 2017
Posts: 384
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
GMAT 1: 630 Q44 V33
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 3: 710 Q50 V37
GPA: 3.25
WE: Marketing (Telecommunications)
Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Jul 2018, 15:31
Hi chetan2u

1. How the usage of "would have been" is justified without past perfect in the if-clause? Usually we use "would"
2. Since it in "it was also evident" playse role of placeholder pronoun, shouldn't "but" preceded by COMMA as independent clause usually does?
There is no logic to belive that "it" refers to "commitment" rather than to the whole action "commitment in the team was low".

Thanks.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Posts: 75
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Oct 2018, 04:34
Why not D ?
If would have v3 , ... had + v3 >> the correct usage ???

Please explain


P
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 20 Apr 2016
Posts: 5
Re: Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Oct 2018, 04:41
Experts please throw some light on this team was/were predicament. I'm still confused on the right answer
SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 1746
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Oct 2018, 06:43
1
1
ajaykv - if clause is presenting an imaginary situation. This will come under subjunctive mood. Lets take an example.
If I were president of this country, I would have made everyone in this country rich.

This one is presenting an imaginary situation and expressed in this format. Only A followed this construction. To know more about SM

https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-gram ... ive-tense/
_________________
Thanks!
Do give some kudos.

Simple strategy:
“Once you’ve eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

Want to improve your Score:
GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 1| GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 2 | How to Improve GMAT Quant from Q49 to a Perfect Q51 | Time management

My Notes:
Reading comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Absolute Phrases | Subjunctive Mood
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 25 Nov 2017
Posts: 87
Location: India
GMAT 1: 590 Q47 V25
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V29
GPA: 3.56
CAT Tests
Re: Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Oct 2018, 11:20
1
Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident that a lot of activity in the team
did not align with the project's objectives, and would have been challenged if the team were aware of the
project's purpose.


A. Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident that a lot of activity in the team
did not align with the project's objectives, and would have been challenged if the team were aware of the
project's purpose. CORRECT

B. It was evident that a lot of activity in the team did not align with the project's objectives, and would have
been challenged if the team was aware of the project's purpose when, unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low.: Was : To describe a situation which is contrary to the fact, we use subjunctive form of were. Other error : In the original sentence , projects's purpose means projects's purpose in general. This option means project's purpose for a specific condition, i.e. project's purpose when commitment is low.

C. Surprisingly, it was evident that a lot of activity in the team did not align with the project's objectives, and
would have been challenged if the team were aware of the project's purpose when, unsurprisingly, commitment
in the team was low.
: Error same as in 2nd error in B.

D. Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident that a lot of activity in the team did
not align with the project's objectives, and would have been challenged if the team had been a ware of the
project's purpose.: Error same in 1st error of B

E. Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident that a lot of activity in the team did
not align with the project's objectives, and would have been challenged if the team was aware of the project's : Same error as in D
purpose.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 25 Nov 2017
Posts: 87
Location: India
GMAT 1: 590 Q47 V25
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V29
GPA: 3.56
CAT Tests
Re: Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Oct 2018, 11:24
The sentence uses " a lot of activity". IMO : it should be "a lot of activities" Experts, am I right , here ! Plz help.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 27 Jul 2016
Posts: 77
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Oct 2018, 02:25
I thought would+have+v3 only comes with had+v3.

Am I correct?
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 27 Nov 2018
Posts: 30
Re: Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Mar 2019, 18:14
Why isn't D correct?
I googled if were vs if had been, and found that

Quote:
"If I were you" refers to a general hypothetical situation, that of me being in your position.
"If I had been you" refers only to a hypothetical situation at a particular time in the past. The meaning is, "If I had been in your shoes at that time".

Is 'if had been' not grammatically correct in gmat? The situational meaning behind the idiom definitely works in this question, since the creation of a project happens in a situation, and the formation of a team is also situational, so using 'had been' would've been more specific
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 29 Jan 2019
Posts: 46
Location: Afganistan
GPA: 4
WE: Business Development (Computer Software)
Re: Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Apr 2019, 02:01
Please explain why D is not correct.

If I had enough money, I would have bought Taj Mahal:

I don't think that this is an incorrect sentence; However, one can doubt my intention to do so. :)
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 07 Jul 2018
Posts: 8
WE: Medicine and Health (Military & Defense)
Re: Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Apr 2019, 08:02
rupeshnverbal wrote:
Please explain why D is not correct.

If I had enough money, I would have bought Taj Mahal:

I don't think that this is an incorrect sentence; However, one can doubt my intention to do so. :)


It is not an incorrect sentence. (Here had means got, which is Simple Past so-If Clause Simple Past, then clause Simple Past/would.)
If I had enough money, I would buy the Taj Mahal.

But it would have been perfect if it says, If I had had enough money, I would have bought the Taj Mahal.

'Past perfect" in if clause takes "would have" in then clause.

Option D says "would have XXX", but the if clause doesn't seem to be past perfect. Had been aware seems that they were aware for sometime.
Hypothetical subjunctive seems to be the right fit here. So D is incorrect.

-my understanding.
Manhattan Prep Instructor
User avatar
S
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 1453
Re: Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Apr 2019, 01:05
D is the only possible answer to this question. For a PAST hypothetical, we need "If x HAD happened, Y WOULD HAVE happened." We would use "If the team WERE aware" for a present or future hypothetical.
_________________

Dmitry Farber | Manhattan Prep GMAT Instructor | San Diego


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident   [#permalink] 28 Apr 2019, 01:05
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Unsurprisingly, commitment in the team was low but it was also evident

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.