GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 22 Oct 2019, 20:25

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Until the time of Cantor’s work on set theory in the 1870s, no serious

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Retired Moderator
Status: The best is yet to come.....
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 484
Until the time of Cantor’s work on set theory in the 1870s, no serious  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2017, 02:19
3
7
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

64% (01:02) correct 36% (01:09) wrong based on 292 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Until the time of Cantor’s work on set theory in the 1870s, no serious mathematician anywhere in the world, even the giants in the field, like Leonard Euler and Karl Gauss, were able to appreciate that infinity can be studied with rigorous precision.

(A) even the giants in the field, like Leonard Euler and Karl Gauss, were
(B) not even the giants in the field, such as Leonard Euler and Karl Gauss, were
(C) not the giants in the field, like Leonard Euler and Karl Gauss, was
(D) even the giants in the field, such as Leonard Euler and Karl Gauss, were
(E) not even the giants in the field, such as Leonard Euler and Karl Gauss, was

_________________
Hasan Mahmud
Retired Moderator
Status: The best is yet to come.....
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 484
Re: Until the time of Cantor’s work on set theory in the 1870s, no serious  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2017, 02:20
3
3
OE

Split #1: the subject, “no serious mathematician“, is singular. Thus, it demands a singular verb, “was“. Choices (A) & (B) & (D) make the mistake of using “were“, so these are incorrect.

Split #2: listing examples. For a list of examples, the GMAT disapproves of “like“, and prefers “such as“. The choices that use “like Leonard Euler and Karl Gauss” are incorrect. Choices (A) & (C) make this mistake.

Split #3a: logic mistake. After the comma after “no serious mathematician“, we need to repeat the negative. Choices (A) & (D) don’t do that.

Split #3b: a subtle logic mistake involving the word “even“. If we say, “no serious mathematicians anywhere in the world, not giants such as Euler and Gauss“, then something is funny —- the phrase “serious mathematicians anywhere in the world” sounds like a large inclusive category, but “giants such as Euler and Gauss” sounds like a smaller elite group. Without the word “even“, we are equating these two groups, and something is awkward and not right about this. Including the word “even” resolves this problem: it clearly distinguishes the larger, more inclusive category, from the special case elite group. The correct answer needs to include the word “even“. This is another problem with answer choice (C).

The only possible answer is (E).
_________________
Hasan Mahmud
##### General Discussion
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2016
Posts: 358
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Re: Until the time of Cantor’s work on set theory in the 1870s, no serious  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2017, 02:55
We need ‘was’ as no singular mathematician is singular.
A,B,D are out.
C uses like to introduce 2 mathematicians which is incorrect.

Posted from my mobile device
_________________
Put in the work, and that dream score is yours!
Manager
Joined: 20 Jan 2016
Posts: 175
Re: Until the time of Cantor’s work on set theory in the 1870s, no serious  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2017, 11:01
The answer is E because the 2 names introduced should be such as (used for examples) not like (used for comparison). Furthermore, was should be used instead of were.
Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2015
Posts: 78
Location: Australia
Re: Until the time of Cantors work on set theory in the 1870s, no serious  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jan 2018, 14:28
Hi There,

no serious mathematician is SINGULAR. Hence we need "was able to appreciate..." not "were able to appreciate..."
A, B and D OUT
We need such as to give examples, Not LIKE. So, C is OUT

Ans: E

Easy question 550-600 level IMHO

Regards

chesstitans wrote:
Until the time of Cantors work on set theory in the 1870s, no serious mathematician anywhere in the world, even the giants in the field, like Leonard Euler and Karl Gauss, were able to appreciate that infinity can be studied with rigorous precision.

(A) even the giants in the field, like Leonard Euler and Karl Gauss, were
(B) not even the giants in the field, such as Leonard Euler and Karl Gauss, were
(C) not the giants in the field, like Leonard Euler and Karl Gauss, was
(D) even the giants in the field, such as Leonard Euler and Karl Gauss, were
(E) not even the giants in the field, such as Leonard Euler and Karl Gauss, was
Intern
Joined: 23 Jan 2018
Posts: 24
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Nonprofit
GPA: 3.7
Re: Until the time of Cantor’s work on set theory in the 1870s, no serious  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jan 2018, 09:51
subject-verb agreement, "such as" vs "like"
no is singular here.
none can be plural
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 5946
Re: Until the time of Cantor’s work on set theory in the 1870s, no serious  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Aug 2019, 10:42
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Re: Until the time of Cantor’s work on set theory in the 1870s, no serious   [#permalink] 22 Aug 2019, 10:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by